Bible Teach 03 Context Notes
Bible Teach 03 Context Notes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
It is important to understand what is meant by "context" when using it to interpret a passage of Scripture. The
context of a passage includes all of the following things:
The verses immediately before and after the passage.
The paragraph and book in which the passage appears.
Other books by this author, as well as the overall message of the entire Bible.
The cultural environment of the time when the passage was written.
The historical period (dispensation) of "Progressive Revelation" during which the passage was written.
Context is important because it forces the interpreter to examine the biblical writer's overall flow of thought. The
meaning of any passage is nearly always determined, controlled, or limited by what appears immediately
beforehand and afterward in the text.
"By observing what precedes and what follows a passage, the interpreter has greater opportunity to see what the
writer was seeking to convey to his original readers. These readers did not plunge into the middle of the letter and
seize out a few consecutive sentences. They read carefully the whole document. To treat material fairly the modern
interpreter must enter into the total train of thought. No axiom is better known and more frequently disobeyed than
the oft quoted: 'A text without a context is just a pretext.' Faithful adherence to context will create in the interpreter a
genuine appreciation for the authority of Scripture."1 A respect for the authority of Scripture means that we will seek
its meaning rather than putting ourselves in authority above Scripture as the determiner of its meaning.
We all have a tendency to take verses out of context and use them to support points that we think are important.
This is called "proof-texting" -- and it is our own attempt to make the Bible say what we want it to say, rather than
letting the text of Scripture say what God intended to communicate. "The most common failure in interpretation is to
violate this most simple and basic principle: the context must control."2
Galatians 5:4 -- Does "Falling from grace" mean that a person can lose his salvation? In the context of this
passage, the apostle Paul was discussing the legalistic "Circumcision Party" and their attempt to bring the believers
under the bondage of the Mosaic Law. He warned these believers that if a person seeks justification by God
through human effort in obeying the Law, then he has rejected the way of salvation that God provided through the
gracious gift of His Son -- he has departed from the way of grace, or is "fallen from grace."
1 Corinthians 7:1 -- "It is good for a man not to touch a woman." Does this mean that there should be no physical
contact whatsoever between men and women? In what sense is a man not to "touch" a woman? This passage
occurs in the context of the importance of abstaining from sexual immorality (1 Cor 5:1-5; 6:9-20; 7:2, 9), and that is
the sense in which a man is not to touch a woman. It would be wrong to conclude that any man should never touch
any woman, but sexual purity should be the goal for every man and woman.
2 Thessalonians 2:7 -- "For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until
he is taken out of the way." Who is the one who restrains lawlessness? Unfortunately, the apostle Paul never
directly identified the restrainer, but he assumed that the Thessalonians knew (based on his previous teaching: see
2 Thess 2:5, 15). Our study of the context of this passage indicates that whoever the restrainer is (1) he must have
actively existed from the time of Paul through the period of history until the "man of lawlessness" [Antichrist] will be
revealed; (2) he must have the authority to dictate, control, and direct human actions and events; (3) he must be
powerful enough to hold back mighty spiritual forces -- even those of Satan himself -- see 2 Thess 2:9; (4) he must
be able to hold back lawlessness everywhere at once on a global scale; and (5) he must maintain or uphold the
Page 1 of 4
standard of absolute holiness during this time period. The only plausible candidate who meets all of these
requirements is God the Holy Spirit (especially through his unique ministry during the Church Age).
1 John 3:6-10 -- "No one who abides in Him sins; no one who sins has seen Him or knows Him." Does this mean
that, in order to maintain his status as a Christian, a believer must never sin? In the context of the entire book of
First John this interpretation would be incorrect, because John clearly states that Christians do sin (see 1 John 1:8,
10; 2:1; 5:16), and that believers have a remedy when that occurs (see 1 John 1:9). Therefore, we must seek
another interpretation of 1 John 3:6-10 that is more consistent with the context of the entire message of the book.
The purpose of the biblical writer will influence the meaning of every passage in the book. Understanding the
writer's general purpose will provide a larger context for each specific passage, and this will help to determine the
author's intended meaning. We should allow his purpose to control our interpretation. A basic rule is that each
passage should be interpreted in light of the overall purpose of the biblical writer.
An isolated passage cannot be interpreted as if it were disconnected from all of the ideas that come before and
afterward. Outlines are very helpful in discerning the overall plan of a book. In order to identify and outline the flow
of thought, it is important to look for changes or transitions in the text. The biblical writers normally present their
messages in recognizable steps. To understand these steps, we must look at the structure and flow of the larger
context. Changes in the text may provide clues to the structure of a writer's thoughts. For example:
1. There may be significant "signposts" in the text. For example, in 1 Corinthians 7:1; 7:25; 8:1; 12:1; and 16:1 we see
2.
3.
4.
The author may use regular repetition. He may compare or contrast things consistently. He may write in sequence
from cause to effect (or effect to cause).
"It is important to seek an understanding of the purpose through direct reading of the book before consulting the
opinions of others. But it would be a mistake to make a final decision without consulting what specialists have
concluded. If a Bible introduction book, a Bible handbook, and the introduction of the biblical book in one or two
commentaries all concur as to what the purpose is, one can proceed with some confidence on that basis as he
studies the book. If there is no general agreement among the specialists, it is probably because no particular
purpose is altogether clear. In that case, no purpose should be used as a guideline for interpreting a specific
passage, except in a general way."3
A study of the larger context of a Scripture passage usually shows why the author wrote to his readers the way he
did. "As we understand the purpose of the original writer, we are deterred from attaching ideas to his writings that
are completely foreign to his purpose or development of thought."4 Our goal should always be to determine the
intended meaning of the biblical author, rather than a meaning we impose on the text.
Sometimes parallel passages in other Bible books can shed light on the meaning of a passage which is obscure in
its immediate context. When we say that a passage is parallel it may be a direct verbal parallel with similar words
and phrases, or it may be a conceptual parallel where a similar idea is expressed in different words. For example,
parallels exist between parts of 1 & 2 Kings and 1 & 2 Chronicles, between parts of Galatians and Romans,
between parts of Ephesians and Colossians, parts of 2 Peter and Jude, as well as between parts of Daniel and
Revelation.
Cross-reference resources can help locate other passages that speak about the same idea or event. But we should
not assume that such reference materials are on the same level with the inspired Word of God. "Marginal
Page 2 of 4
references in various Bibles are famous (or infamous) for providing other materials which have a real or supposed
bearing on the passage being studied. While these should be used, they should also be critically evaluated to see
whether the citation is an actual parallel, merely a chance resemblance, or an apparent resemblance without true
similarity of thought pattern."5 As responsible interpreters of the Word of God, we should carefully evaluate parallel
passages to see whether they help us determine the author's intended meaning for the text we are studying.
1. An obscure or ambiguous text should never be interpreted in such a way as to contradict the teaching of a plain or
2.
clear passage. For example, in 1 Corinthians 15:29 the words "baptized for the dead" should not be interpreted to
mean that substitutionary baptism can somehow bring salvation to a person who has already died. This would
contradict the plain teaching of many other passages in Scripture.
A complicated or complex interpretation should not be given preference over a simple or more natural explanation.
For example, in Matthew 16:28 when Jesus said, "Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing
here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom," He was obviously not referring
to the Millennial Kingdom because all those present would die before that time. A simpler explanation is that He
was referring to the foretaste of His kingdom which was experienced six days later on the Mount of Transfiguration
(Matt 17:1-13).
A Final Challenge
Bible Handbooks
Bible Handbooks provide outlines and overviews of every book in the Bible.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Bible Surveys
Bible Surveys provide helpful overviews of the entire Word of God.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Page 3 of 4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Endnotes
1
Copyright
2006 Some Rights Reserved by Steve Lewis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Page 4 of 4