PCI Design Example (Unlocked by WWW - Freemypdf.com)
PCI Design Example (Unlocked by WWW - Freemypdf.com)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESIGN EXAMPLES
NOTATION
9.0
INTRODUCTION
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
JUL 03
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
A
A
Ab
Ac
Ac
Acv
Ao
Aps
APT
As
As
As
Asf
Asr
A*s
As
Av
Av
Avf
Avh
Av-min
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
be
bv
bv
bv
bw
CRc
CRs
c
c
D
D
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
DC
DFD
DFM
DFm
DFV
DW
d
db
dc
de
de
dp
dv
E
Ec
Ec
Eci
Ep
ES
Es
Es
e
e
e
ec
ee
eg
Fb
Fpi
F
fb
f c
f c
fcdp
fcds
fcir
f ci
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
f ci
fcgp
fd
fpb
fpc
fpc
fpe
fpe
fpi
fpo
fps
fpt
fpu
fpy
fr
fr
fs
f s
fse
fsi
f *su
ft
ftc
ftg
fy
fy
fy
f y
fyh
H
H
h
h
JUL 03
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
hc
hf
I
I
I
Ic
IM
J
K
Kg
k
k
L
L
L
L
L
Lc
LL
ld
lx
Ma
Mb
Mb
Mc
MCIP
Mconst
Mcol
Mcr
Mcr
M *cr
MD
Md
Md/nc
Mf
Mg
MLL
MLL+I
MLL+I
MLT
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
JUL 03
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
Mmax
Mn
Mn
Mn/dc
Mr
Ms
Ms
MSDL
Mservice
MSIP
Mu
Mu
Mws
Mx
m
m
Nb
NL
Nu
n
P
P
Pc
Peff
Pi
Ppe
Pr
Ps
Pse
Psi
P20
Q
Qi
q
RH
Rn
Ru
Rw
S
S
S
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
S
S
Sb
Sbc
SH
SR
St
Stc
Stg
s
s
s
T
t
t
tf
ts
ts
Vc
Vc
Vci
Vcw
Vd
Vi
VLL
VLL+I
VLL+I
VLT
Vmu
Vn
Vnh
Vp
Vp
Vs
Vs
Vu
[STD]
LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
JUL 03
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
Vu
= factored shear force at section
[LRFD]
Vuh
= factored horizontal shear force per unit length of the beam
[LRFD]
Vx
= shear force at a distance (x) from the support
v
= factored shear stress
[LRFD]
W
= overall width of bridge measured perpendicular to the longitudinal beams
[STD]
w
= a uniformly distributed load
[LRFD]
w
= width of clear roadway
[LRFD]
wb
= weight of barriers
wc
= unit weight of concrete
[STD]
wc
= unit weight of concrete
[LRFD]
wg
= beam self-weight
ws
= slab and haunch weights
wws
= weight of future wearing surface
X
= distance from load to point of support
[STD]
x
= the distance from the support to the section under question
yb
= distance from centroid to the extreme bottom fiber of the non-composite precast beam
ybc
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam
ybs
= distance from the center of gravity of strands to the bottom fiber of the beam
yt
= distance from centroid to the extreme top fiber of the non-composite precast beam
ytc
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme top fiber of the slab
ytg
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme top fiber of the precast beam
Z (or z)= factor reflecting exposure conditions
[LRFD], [STD]
= factor indicating ability of diagonally cracked concrete to transmit tension (a value indicating
concrete contribution)
[LRFD]
D
= load combination coefficient for dead loads
[STD]
L
= load combination coefficient for live loads
[STD]
1
= factor for concrete strength
[STD]
1
= ratio of the depth of the equivalent uniformly stressed compression zone assumed in the
strength limit state to the depth of the actual compression zone
[LRFD]
beam = deflection due to beam self-weight
b+ws = deflection due to barrier and wearing surface weights
fcdp = change in concrete stress at center of gravity of pretensioning steel due to dead loads except
the dead load acting at the time of the pretensioning force is applied
[LRFD]
fpCR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to creep
[LRFD]
fpES = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to elastic shortening
[LRFD]
fpi
= total loss in pretensioning steel stress immediately after transfer
fpR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel
[LRFD]
fpR1 = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel at transfer
[LRFD]
fpR2 = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel after transfer
[LRFD]
fpSR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to shrinkage
[LRFD]
JUL 03
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
fpT
D
L
LL+I
LL
LT
max
p
SDL
slab
x
*
i
actual
b
*
A *s
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
JUL 03
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.6.1
INTRODUCTION
9.6.2
MATERIALS
9.6.3
9.6.4
9.6.5
9.6.6
PRESTRESS LOSSES
9.6.6.1 Elastic Shortening
9.6.6.2 Shrinkage
9.6.6.3 Creep of Concrete
9.6.6.4 Relaxation of Prestressing Strand
9.6.6.4.1 Relaxation before Transfer
9.6.6.4.2 Relaxation after Transfer
9.6.6.5 Total Losses at Transfer
9.6.6.6 Total Losses at Service Loads
JUL 03
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.6.7
STRESSES AT TRANSFER
9.6.7.1 Stress Limits for Concrete
9.6.7.2 Stresses at Transfer Length Section
9.6.7.3 Stresses at Harp Points
9.6.7.4 Stresses at Midspan
9.6.7.5 Hold-Down Forces
9.6.7.6 Summary of Stresses at Transfer
9.6.8
9.6.9
JUL 03
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), THREE SPANS, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.6.11.3 Contribution of Reinforcement to Nominal Shear Resistance
9.6.11.3.1 Requirement for Reinforcement
9.6.11.3.2 Required Area of Reinforcement
9.6.11.3.3 Spacing of Reinforcement
9.6.11.3.4 Minimum Reinforcement Requirement
9.6.11.4 Maximum Nominal Shear Resistance
9.6.12 INTERFACE SHEAR TRANSFER
9.6.12.1 Factored Horizontal Shear
9.6.12.2 Required Nominal Resistance
9.6.12.3 Required Interface Shear Reinforcement
9.6.12.3.1 Minimum Interface Shear Reinforcement
9.6.12.4 Maximum Nominal Shear Resistance
9.6.13 MINIMUM LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENT
9.6.14 PRETENSIONED ANCHORAGE ZONE
9.6.14.1 Anchorage Zone Reinforcement
9.6.14.2 Confinement Reinforcement
9.6.15 DEFLECTION AND CAMBER
9.6.15.1 Deflection Due to Prestressing Force at Transfer
9.6.15.2 Deflection Due to Beam Self-Weight
9.6.15.3 Deflection Due to Haunch and Deck
9.6.15.4 Deflection Due to Barrier and Future Wearing Surface
9.6.15.5 Deflection and Camber Summary
9.6.15.6 Deflection Due to Live Load and Impact
JUL 03
Bulb-Tee (BT-72),
Three Spans, Composite Deck,
LRFD Specifications
9.6.1
INTRODUCTION
Figure 9.6.1-1
Longitudinal Section
C
L pier
C
L pier
110'-0"
6"
6"
6"
C
L bearing
CL bearing
1'-0"
Figure 9.6.1-2
Cross-Section
110'-0"
120'-0"
6"
6"
C
L bearing
6"
CL bearing
1'-0"
1'-0"
C
L bearing
6"
CL bearing
1'-0"
44'- 6"
42'- 0"
1' - 3"
6"
1' - 3"
3'- 0"
4'- 3"
8"
3'- 0"
4'- 3"
JUL 03
9.6.2
MATERIALS
Figure 9.6.2-1
AASHTO-PCI Bulb-Tee, BT-72
3'- 6"
3 1/2"
2"
2"
2"
4'- 6"
10"
6'- 0"
6"
4 1/2"
6"
2'- 2"
JUL 03
for the precast beam at transfer, Eci = 33,000(0.150)1.5 5.5 = 4,496 ksi
for the precast beam at service loads, Ec = 33,000(0.150)1.5 7.0 = 5,072 ksi
9.6.3.2
Composite Section
9.6.3.2.1
Effective Flange Width
9.6.3.2.2
Modular Ratio Between Slab
And Beam Materials
9.6.3.2.3
Transformed Section
Properties
E c (slab) 3,834
=
= 0.7559
E c (beam) 5,072
Figure 9.6.3.2.3-1
Composite Section
83.90"
31.75"
7.5"
0.5"
c.g. of composite
section
80"
72"
ybc
JUL 03
Table 9.6.3.2.3-1
Properties of Composite Section
Beam
Haunch
Deck
Transformed
yb
Ayb
A(y bc - yb )2
I + A(ybc - yb )2
Area, in.2
in.
in.3
in.4
in.4
in.4
767.00
36.60
28,072.20
250,444.60
545,894.00
796,338
15.87
72.25
1,146.61
4,904.73
0.33
4,905
629.29
76.25
47,983.36
293,058.09
2,949.61
296,007
1,412.16
77,202.17
1,097,251
Note that the haunch should only be considered to contribute to section properties
if it is required to be provided in the completed structure. Some designers neglect its
contribution to the section properties.
Ac = total area of composite section = 1,412 in.2
hc = overall depth of the composite section = 80 in.
Ic = moment of inertia of the composite section = 1,097,252 in.4
ybc = distance from the centroid of the composite section to the extreme bottom fiber
77 , 202
of the precast beam =
= 54.67 in.
1, 412
ytg = distance from the centroid of the composite section to the extreme top fiber of
the precast beam = 72 54.67 = 17.33 in.
ytc = distance from the centroid of the composite section to the extreme top fiber of
the slab = 80 54.67 = 25.33 in.
Sbc = composite section modulus for the extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam
1,097, 252
3
= (Ic/ybc) =
= 20,070 in.
54.67
Stg = composite section modulus for the top fiber of the precast beam
1,097, 252
3
= (Ic/ytg) =
= 63,315 in.
17.33
Stc = composite section modulus for extreme top fiber of the deck slab
1
1 1,097, 252
3
= (Ic/ytc) =
= 57,307 in.
n
0.7559 25.33
9.6.4
SHEAR FORCES AND
BENDING MOMENTS
9.6.4.1
Shear Forces and
Bending Moments
Due to Dead Loads
9.6.4.1.1
Dead Loads
The self-weight of the beam and the weight of the slab and haunch act on the noncomposite, simple-span structure, while the weight of barriers, future wearing surface, and live loads with impact act on the composite, continuous structure. Refer to
Table 9.6.4-1 which follows for a summary of unfactored values, calculated below:
For a simply supported beam with a span (L) loaded with a uniformly distributed
load (w), the shear force (Vx) and bending moment (Mx) at any distance (x) from the
support are given by:
Vx = w(0.5L x)
(Eq. 9.6.4.1.2-1)
Mx = 0.5wx(L x)
(Eq. 9.6.4.1.2-2)
Using the above equations, values of shear forces and bending moments for a typical
interior beam, under self-weight of beam and weight of slab and haunch are computed and given in Table 9.6.4-1 that is found at the end of Section 9.6.4. The span
length for each span to be considered depends on the construction stage:
overall length immediately after prestress release
centerline-to-centerline distance between beam bearings at the time of deck
placement
centerline-to-centerline distance between supports after beams are made continuous
JUL 03
Shear forces and bending moments due to barrier weight and future wearing surface
are calculated based on the continuous span lengths, 110, 120 and 110 ft. The threespan structure was analyzed using a continuous beam program. The shear forces and
bending moments are given in Table 9.6.4-1.
9.6.4.2
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to Live
Loads
9.6.4.2.1
Live Loads
Design live load is HL-93, which consists of a combination of: [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.1]
1. Design truck or design tandem with dynamic allowance. [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.1]
The design truck is the same as the HS20 design truck specified by the
Standard Specifications [STD Art. 3.6.1.2.2]. The design tandem consists of a
pair of 25.0-kip axles spaced 4.0 ft apart. [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.3]. Spans in the
range used in this example are much larger than those controlled by the tandem loading. For this reason, tandem loading effects are not included.
2. Design lane load of 0.64 kips/ft without dynamic allowance [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.4]
Art. 3.6.1.3.1 in the LRFD Specifications requires that for negative moment between
points of dead load contraflexure, and, for reactions at interior piers only, 90% of the
effect of two design trucks spaced at a minimum of 50.0 ft between the lead axle of
one truck and the rear axle of the other truck, combined with 90% of the effect of
the design lane load be considered. The distance between the 32 kip axles of each
truck should be taken as 14 ft.
This three-span structure was analyzed using a continuous beam program that has
the ability to generate live load shear force, and bending moment envelopes in accordance with the LRFD Specifications on a per-lane basis. The span lengths used are the
continuous span lengths, 110, 120 and 110 ft.
9.6.4.2.2
Distribution Factor for a
Typical Interior Beam
The live load bending moments and shear forces are determined by using the simplified
distribution factor formulas [LRFD Art. 4.6.2.2]. To use the simplified live load distribution factor formulas, the following conditions must be met. [LRFD Art. 4.6.2.2.1]
Width of deck is constant O.K.
Number of beams, Nb 4 (Nb = 4) O.K.
Beams are parallel and approximately of the same stiffness O.K.
6
Roadway part of overhang, de 3.0 ft d e = 3.0 1.25 0.5 = 1.50 ft
O.K.
12
Curvature is less than 4 [LRFD Table. 4.6.1.2.1-1] (Curvature = 0.0) O.K.
For precast concrete I- or bulb-tee beams with cast-in-place concrete deck slab, the
bridge type is (k)
[LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.1-1]
The number of design lanes:
Number of design lanes = The integer part of the ratio of (w/12), where (w) is the clear
roadway width, in ft, between the curbs.
[Art. 3.6.1.1.1]
From Figure 9.6.1-2, w = 42 ft
Number of design lanes = integer part of (42/12) = 3 lanes
JUL 03
9.6.4.2.2.1
Distribution Factor for
Bending Moment
0.6
S
L
0.2
Kg
12.0Lt 3s
0.1
0.6
12
120
0.2
2,317,339.75
(12.0)(120)(7.5) 3
0.1
0.4
12
= 0.06 +
14
0.4
S
L
0.3
12
120
Kg
12.0Lt 3s
0.3
0.1
2, 217,339.75
12.0(120)(7.5) 3
JUL 03
3.5
20
4.5
Nb
S 16
L 240
ts 12
4
S = 12.0 ft O.K.
L = 120 ft O.K.
ts = 7.5 in. O.K.
Nb = 4 O.K.
where
DFV = Distribution factor for shear for interior beam
S
= Beam spacing, ft
Therefore, the distribution factor for shear force for both end spans and center span
is:
2
12 12
DFV = 0.2 + = 1.082 lanes/beam
12 35
For one design lane loaded:
S
12
DFV = 0.36 +
= 0.36 +
= 0.840 lanes/beam
25.0
25.0
Thus, the case of two or more lanes loaded controls, DFV = 1.082 lanes/beam.
9.6.4.2.3
Dynamic Allowance
IM = 33%
[LRFD Table 3.6.2.1-1]
where IM = dynamic load allowance, applied only to truck load
JUL 03
9.6.4.2.4
Unfactored Shear Forces and
Bending Moments
9.6.4.3
Load Combinations
JUL 03
Section
x/L
JUL 03
Barrier weight
[continuous span]
Shear
Moment
Mb
kips
ft-kips
6.0
0.0
5.0
62.0
3.0
106.0
2.0
132.0
0.0
139.0
2.0
128.0
3.0
100.0
5.0
53.0
7.0
-12.0
8.0
-95.0
9.8*
-187.7*
10.0
-197.0
9.0
-197.0
8.8*
-188.9*
7.8*
-139.6*
7.0
-100.0
5.0
-24.0
4.0
30.0
2.0
62.0
0.0
73.0
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0.900
0.991
1.000
0.000
0.008
0.059
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
Distance
x
ft
0.0[1]
11.0
22.0
33.0
44.0
55.0
66.0
77.0
88.0
99.0
109.0[1]
110.0
0.0[2]
1.0[1]
7.1[3]
12.0
24.0
36.0
48.0
60.0
Beam weight
[simple span]
Shear
Moment
Mg
kips
ft-kips
43.5
0.0
34.8
430.7
26.0
764.6
17.2
1,001.9
8.4
1,142.6
0.4
1,186.5
9.2
1,133.8
18.0
984.4
26.8
738.3
35.6
395.5
43.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
47.1
0.0
42.3
272.7
38.4
470.2
28.8
872.9
19.2
1,160.5
9.6
1,333.1
0.0
1,390.7
Location
Table 9.6.4-1
Unfactored Shear Forces and Bending Moments for a Typical Interior Beam
Note: The live load used in the above equation results only from a single design truck
with a 30-ft constant spacing between the 32.0 kip axles with the special dynamic
allowance, (IM) for fatigue.
9.6.5
ESTIMATE REQUIRED
PRESTRESS
9.6.5.1
Service Load Stresses
at Midspan
The required number of strands is usually governed by concrete tensile stresses at the
bottom fiber for the load combination at Service III at the section of maximum
moment or at the harp points. For estimating the number of strands, only the stresses at midspan are considered.
Bottom tensile stress due to applied dead and live loads using load combination
Service III, is:
fb =
Mg + Ms
Sb
M b + M ws + (0.8)(M LL+I )
S bc
where
fb
Mg
Ms
Mb
Mws
9.6.5.3
Required Number
of Strands
The required precompressive stress at the bottom fiber of the beam is the difference
between bottom tensile stress due to the applied loads and the concrete tensile stress
limit:
fpb = (3.962 0.503) = 3.459 ksi.
The location of the strand center of gravity at midspan, ranges from 5 to 15% of the
beam depth, measured from the bottom of the beam. A value of 5% is appropriate
for newer efficient sections like the bulb-tee beams and 15% for less efficient AASHTO
standard shapes.
JUL 03
Assume the distance from the center of gravity of strands to the bottom fiber of the
beam, ybs, is equal to 7% of the beam depth.
ybs = 0.07h = 0.07(72) = 5.04 in.
Then, the strand eccentricity at midspan, ec, is = (yb - ybs) = (36.60 5.04) = 31.56 in.
If Ppe is the total prestressing force, the stress at the bottom fiber due to prestress is:
fpb =
Ppe
Ppe e c
Assuming final loss of 25% of fpi, the prestress force per strand after all losses =
(0.153)(202.5)(1 0.25) = 23.2 kips
Number of strands required = (1,011.5/23.2) = 43.6 strands
Try (44) 1/2 in. diameter, 270 ksi, low-relaxation strands
9.6.5.4
Strand Pattern
The assumed strand pattern for the 44 strands at midspan is shown in Figure 9.6.5.4-1.
Each available position was filled beginning with the bottom row.
Figure 9.6.5.4-1
Assumed Strand Pattern
at Midspan
No.
Strands
2
2
2
2
4
8
12
12
2"
11 spaces @ 2"
Distance from
bottom (in.)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
2"
JUL 03
The distance between the center of gravity of strands and the bottom concrete fiber
of the beam, ybs, is:
ybs = [(12(2) + 12(4) + 8(6) + 4(8) + 2(10) + 2(12) + 2(14) + 2(16)]/44 = 5.82 in.
Strand eccentricity at midspan, ec = yb ybs = 36.60 5.82 = 30.78 in.
9.6.6
PRESTRESS LOSSES
9.6.6.1
Elastic Shortening
fpES =
Ep
E ci
f cgp
where
Ep = modulus of elasticity of prestressing reinforcement = 28,500 ksi
Eci = modulus of elasticity of beam at release = 4,496 ksi
fcgp = sum of concrete stresses at the center of gravity of prestressing tendons due
to prestressing force at transfer and the self-weight of the member at sections of maximum moment
=
2
M ge c
Pi Pe
+ i c
A
I
I
The LRFD Specifications, Art. 5.9.5.2.3a, states that fcgp can be calculated on the
basis of a prestressing steel stress assumed to be 0.7fpu for low-relaxation strands.
However, common practice assumes the initial losses as a percentage of initial
prestressing stress before release, fpi. In both procedures, assumed initial losses
should be checked and if different from the assumed value, a second iteration
should be carried out. In this example, a 9% fpi initial loss is used.
Force per strand at transfer = (area of strand) (prestress stress at release)
= 0.153(202.5)(1 0.09) = 28.2 kips
Pi = total prestressing force at release = (44 strands)(28.2) = 1,240.8 kips
Mg should be calculated based on the overall beam length of 119 ft. However,
since the elastic shortening losses will be a part of the total losses, fcgp will be conservatively computed based on Mg using the design span length of 118 ft.
1, 240.8 (1, 240.8)(30.78) 2 (1,390.7)(12)(30.78)
+
767
545,894
545,894
= 1.618 + 2.153 0.941 = 2.830 ksi
fcgp =
JUL 03
28,500
(2.830) = 17.9 ksi
4, 496
The percent of actual losses due to elastic shortening = (17.9/202.5)100 = 8.8%. Since
calculated loss of 8.8% is approximately equal to the initial assumption of 9% a second
iteration is not necessary. Note that this loss is equivalent to a stress after initial losses of
0.68 fpu. This stress is lower than the estimate of 0.70 fpu, provided in Article 5.9.5.2.3a.
If the elastic shortening loss was calculated using a stress of 0.70 fpu, a second iteration would be required to arrive at a steel stress of 0.68 fpu.
9.6.6.2
Shrinkage
9.6.6.3
Creep of Concrete
M s e c (M ws + M b )(y bc y bs )
+
I
Ic
9.6.6.4.1
Relaxation before Transfer
JUL 03
9.6.6.4.2
Relaxation after Transfer
9.6.6.5
Total Losses at Transfer
9.6.6.6
Total Losses at
Service Loads
9.6.7
STRESSES AT
TRANSFER
9.6.7.1
Stress Limits For Concrete
49.6
(100) = 24.5%
202.5
0.0948 f ci 0.200 ksi; 0.0948 5.5 = 0.222 ksi < 0.200 ksi
Therefore, 0.200 ksi (Controls)
with bonded auxiliary reinforcement which is sufficient to resist 120% of the tension force in the cracked concrete:
9.6.7.2
Stresses at Transfer
Length Section
Stresses at this location need only be checked at release since this stage almost always governs. Also, losses with time will reduce the concrete stresses making them less critical.
Transfer length = 60(strand diameter) = 60(0.5) = 30 in. = 2.5 ft
JUL 03
Due to the camber of the beam at release, the beam self-weight acts on the overall
beam length (119 ft). Therefore, values of bending moment given in Table 9.6.4-1
cannot be used since they are based on the span between centerlines of bearings (118
ft). Using Equation Eq. 9.6.4.1.2-2 given previously, the bending moment at a distance 2.5 ft from the end of the beam is calculated due to beam self-weight:
Mg = (0.5)(0.799)(2.5)(119 2.5) = 116.4 ft-kips
Compute top stress at the top fiber of the beam:
ft =
+
=
+
A Sb Sb
767
14,915
14,915
A Sb Sb
767
14,915
14,915
= 1.618 + 2.561 0.094 = +4.085 ksi
Compressive stress limit for concrete: +3.300 ksi N.G.
N.G.
Since the top and bottom concrete stresses exceed the stress limits, harp strands to
make stresses fall within the specified limits. Harp 12 strands at the 0.3L points, as
shown in Figures 9.6.7.2-1 and 9.6.7.2-2. This harp location is more appropriate for
the end spans of multi-span continuous bridges because the maximum positive
moment is closer to the abutment than in the interior spans. For simple spans, it is
more common to use a harp point at least 0.4L from the ends.
Figure 9.6.7.2-1
Strand Pattern
Distance from
No.
Strands bottom (in.)
70
2
68
2
66
2
64
2
62
2
60
2
2"
Harped strand
group
No.
Strands
2
2
2
2
4
8
12
12
Distance from
bottom (in.)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
No.
Strands
2
6
12
12
2"
At midspan
Distance from
bottom (in.)
8
6
4
2
At ends
JUL 03
Figure 9.6.7.2-2
Longitudinal Strand Profile
12 strands
32 strands
7"
65"
3.9"
2'-6"
11"
35'-6"
24'-0"
0.5(119') = 59'-6"
Compute the center of gravity of the prestressing strands at the transfer length using
the harped pattern.
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped strands at the end of the
beam and the top fiber of the precast beam is:
2(2) + 2(4) + 2(6) + 2(8) + 2(10) + 2(12) = 7.00 in.
12
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped stands at the harp point
and the bottom fiber of the beam is:
2(6) + 2(8) + 2(10) + 2(12) + 2(14) + 2(16) = 11.0 in.
12
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped strands and the top fiber
of the beam at the transfer length section is:
7 in. + (72 11 7) in. (2.5) ft = 10.80 in.
35.5 ft
The distance between the center of gravity of the 32 straight bottom strands and the
extreme bottom fiber of the beam is:
12(2) + 12(4) + 6(6) + 2(8) = 3.88 in.
32
Therefore, the distance between the center of gravity of the total number of the
strands and the bottom fiber of the precast beam at transfer length is:
12(72 10.80) + 32(3.88) = 19.51 in.
44
Eccentricity of the strand group at transfer length, e, is: 36.60 19.51 = 17.09 in.
The distance between the center of gravity of the total number of the strands and the
bottom fiber of the precast beam at the end of the beam is:
12(72 7) + 32(3.88) = 20.55 in.
44
and the eccentricity at the end of the beam, ee, is: 36.60 20.55 = 16.05 in.
Recompute top and bottom stresses at the transfer length section using the harped
pattern:
JUL 03
O.K.
O.K.
The strand eccentricity at the harp points is the same as at midspan, ec = 30.78 in.
The bending moment due to beam self-weight at a distance 35.5 ft (0.3L) from the
end of the beam is:
Mg = (0.5)(0.799)(35.5)(119 35.5) = 1,184.2 ft-kips
Concrete stress at top fiber of the beam,
1, 240.8 (1, 240.8)(30.78) (1,184.2)(12)
= 1.618 2.477 + 0.921 = +0.062 ksi
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
Compressive stress limit for concrete: +3.300 ksi O.K.
ft =
The bending moment due to beam self-weight at a distance 59.5 feet from the end
of the beam is:
Mg = (0.5)(0.799)(59.5)(119 59.5) = 1,414.3 ft-kips
Concrete stress at top fiber of the beam:
ft = 1, 240.8 (1, 240.8)(30.78) + (1, 414.3)(12) = 1.618 2.477 + 1.101 = +0.242 ksi
767
15, 421
15, 421
Compressive stress limit for concrete: +3.300 ksi
Concrete stress at bottom fiber of the beam,
O.K.
O.K.
JUL 03
9.6.7.5
Hold-Down Forces
Assume that the stress in the strand at the time of prestressing, before any losses, is:
0.80fpu = 0.80(270) = 216 ksi
Then, the prestress force per strand before any losses is: 0.153(216) = 33.0 kips
From Figure 9.6.7.2-2, harp angle,
72 7 11
= tan 1
= 7.2
35.5(12)
Therefore, hold-down force/strand = 1.05(force per strand)(sin )
= 1.05(33.0) sin 7.2 = 4.3 kips/strand
Note that the factor, 1.05, is applied to account for friction.
Total hold-down force = 12 strands(4.3) = 51.6 kips
The hold-down force and the harp angle should be checked against maximum limits
for local practices. Refer to Chapter 3, Fabrication and Construction, Section
3.3.2.2, and Chapter 8, Design Theory and Procedures, for additional details.
9.6.7.6
Summary Of
Stresses at Transfer
9.6.8
STRESSES AT
SERVICE LOADS
9.6.8.1
Stress Limits For Concrete
Top stresses
Bottom stresses
ft (ksi)
fb (ksi)
At transfer length section
+0.334
+2.946
At harp points
+0.062
+3.226
At midspan
+0.242
+3.041
Note that the bottom stresses at the harp points are more critical than the ones at
midspan.
The total prestressing force after all losses, Ppe = 1,029.6 kips
JUL 03
9.6.8.2
Stresses at Midspan
+
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
63,315
(M LL+I )
(2,115)(12)
= +2.062 + 0.401 = +2.463 ksi
= + 2.062 +
S tg
63,315
O.K.
(M ws + M b ) (128 + 73)(12)
= +0.042 ksi
=
S tc
57,307
O.K.
O.K.
Ppe
A
Ppe e c
Sb
(Mg + M s )
Sb
(M ws + Mb )+ 0.8(MLL+I )
Sbc
767
14,915
14,915
9.6.8.3
Fatigue Stress Limit
9.6.8.3.1
Positive Moment Section
Fatigue limit state is not checked in this example. For an example of this calculation,
refer to Examples 9.2 and 9.4, Sections 9.2.9.3 and 9.4.8.3 respectively.
9.6.8.3.2
Negative Moment Section
In order to perform the fatigue check, the reinforcement of the section should be
determined. Therefore, the fatigue check for the negative moment section is
addressed in Section 9.6.9.2.1.
9.6.8.4
Summary of Stresses at
Service Loads
At midspan
Bottom of
Beam (ksi)
Permanent
Loads
Total Loads
Permanent
Loads
Total Loads
Service III
+0.042
+0.485
+2.062
+2.463
-0.495
9.6.9
STRENGTH LIMIT STATE
9.6.9.1
Positive Moment Section
c
fps = fpu 1 k
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.1.1-1]
dp
where
fps = average stress in prestressing steel
f py
k = 2 1.04
f pu
dp = distance from extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the prestressing tendons = h ybs = 80.00 5.82 = 74.18 in.
c = distance between the neutral axis and the compressive face, in.
To compute c, assume rectangular section behavior, and check if the depth of
the neutral axis, c is equal to or less than ts:
[LRFD 5.7.3.2.2]
c=
A psf pu + A sf y A sf y
f pu
0.85f c1 b + kA ps
dp
JUN 04
where
Aps = area of prestressing steel = 44 x 0.153 = 6.732 in.2
fpu = specified tensile strength of prestressing steel = 270 ksi
As = area of mild steel tension reinforcement = 0.0 in.2
fy = yield strength of tension reinforcement = 60.0 ksi
As = area of compression reinforcement = 0.0 in.2
f y = yield strength of compression reinforcement = 60.0 ksi
f c = compressive strength of deck concrete = 4.0 ksi
1 = stress factor of compression block
[LRFD Art. 5.7.2.2]
O.K.
5.55
fps = 270 1 0.28
= 264.3 ksi
74.18
Nominal flexural resistance:
a
Mn = Apsfps d p
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.2.2-1]
2
This equation is a simplified form of LRFD Equation 5.7.3.2.2-1 because no compression reinforcement or mild tension reinforcement is considered and the section
behaves as a rectangular section.
4.72
Mn = (6.732)(264.3) 74.18
/12 = 10,648.9 ft-kips
2
Factored flexural resistance:
Mr = Mn
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.2.1-1]
where = resistance factor
[LRFD Art. 5.5.4.2.1]
= 1.00, for flexure and tension of prestressed concrete
Mr = 10,648.9 ft-kips > Mu = 8,381.6 ft-kips
O.K.
9.6.9.2
Negative Moment Section
9.6.9.2.1
Design of the Section
Notes:
1. At the negative moment section, the compression face is the bottom flange of the
beam and is 26 in. wide.
2. This section is a nonprestressed reinforced concrete section, thus = 0.9 for flexure.
Assume the deck reinforcement is at mid-height of the deck. The effective depth:
d = 72 + 0.5 + 0.5(7.5) = 76.25 in.
Ru =
m=
=
Mu
4,837.2 (12)
= 0.427 ksi
=
2
bd
(0.9)(26)(76.25) 2
fy
0.85f c
60
= 10.084
(0.85)(7.0)
1
2R u m
1
2(0.427)(10.084)
1 1
=
1 1
= 0.00739
m
f y 10.084
60
As fy
0.85
b f c
15.52(60)
= 6.02 in.
(0.85)(26)(7.0)
Note that this value is slightly larger than the flange thickness of 6.0 in. However, the
adjustment in the moment capacity, Mn, when using a more accurate non-rectangular section analysis, is extremely small.
6.02
a
Mn = A sf y d = 0.9(15.52)(60.0) 76.25
/12
2
2
= 5,115.1 ft-kips > 4,837.2 ft-kips O.K.
With time, creep of concrete members heavily pretensioned, may cause camber
growth. Because this bridge is designed to have rigid connections between beams at
the piers, camber growth is restrained. As a result, time-dependent positive moments
will develop. Therefore, it is recommended that a nominal amount of positive
moment continuity reinforcement be used over the piers to control potential cracking in this region. A common way to provide this reinforcement is to extend approxJUL 03
imately 25 percent of the strands from the bottom flange and bend them up into the
diaphragm. Another common detail is the addition of a quantity of mild steel reinforcement required to resist a moment equal to 1.2 Mcr. This reinforcement is also
extended from the ends of the beam and bent up into the diaphragm.
9.6.9.2.2
Fatigue Stress Limit
and Crack Control
The fatigue limit state and crack control for the negative moment zone over the piers
are important design criteria that must be checked. This zone is expected to be
cracked due to service loads and the steel stress range is expected to be significantly
high.
For moment calculations, the fatigue truck loading must be introduced to the threespan continuous structure. The resulting moments are then used to determine
whether or not the stress range in the longitudinal reinforcement steel is within the
acceptable limits.
In order to control flexural cracking, the tensile stress in the mild steel reinforcement
at service limit state, should not exceed the value given by LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.4.1.
9.6.10
LIMITS OF
REINFORCEMENT
9.6.10.1
Positive Moment Section
9.6.10.1.1
Maximum Reinforcement
A psf psd p + A sf y d s
A psf ps + A sf y
O.K.
JUL 03
where
fr
fpb
Ppe
A
Ppee c
Sb
1,029.6 (1,029.6)(30.78)
= 1.342 + 2.125 = 3.467 ksi
+
767
14,915
Mcr
At midspan, the factored moment required by the Strength I load combination is:
Mu = 8,381.6 ft-kips (as calculated in Section 9.6.9)
Therefore, 1.33Mu = 1.33 x 8,381.6 = 11,147.5 ft-kips
Since 1.2Mcr < 1.33Mu, 1.2Mcr
(Controls)
where
de =
A psf psd p + A sf y d s
A psf ps + A sf y
JUL 03
a 6.02
= 8.60 in.
=
1 0.70
c
8.60
= 0.113 0.42
=
d s 76.25
O.K.
Note that the value of a used here is not exact because the geometry of the bottom
flange must be accommodated. But since a is slightly larger than 6 in., the uniform
width portion of the bottom flange, and since (c/ds) is much lower than the maximum limit, further refinement is not warranted.
9.6.10.2.2
Minimum Reinforcement
(15.52)
= 0.008
(26)(76.25)
7.0
O.K.
= 0.0035
60
At the negative moment section, the bottom flange of the precast beam acts as the
compression block of the composite section. Therefore, the 28-day strength of the
beam concrete, 7.0 ksi, is used.
0.008 0.03
9.6.11
SHEAR DESIGN
The area and spacing of shear reinforcement must be determined at regular intervals
along the entire length of the beam. In this design example, transverse shear design
procedures are demonstrated below by determining these values at the critical section
near the supports.
Transverse shear reinforcement must be provided when:
Vu > 0.5(Vc + Vp)
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.2.4-1]
where
Vu = total factored shear force, kips
Vc = shear strength provided by concrete, kips
Vp = component of the effective prestressing force in the direction of the applied
shear, kips
= resistance factor
[LRFD Art. 5.5.4.2.1]
9.6.11.1
Critical Section
JUL 03
where
de = the corresponding effective depth from the extreme compression fiber to the
centroid of the tensile force in the tensile reinforcement = 76.25 in.
(Note: de is calculated considering the nonprestressed reinforcement in the
slab as the main reinforcement and neglecting the prestress reinforcement.
This is because this section lies in the negative moment zone.)
a = equivalent depth of the compression block = 6.02 in. (from negative moment
flexural design)
h = total height of the section = 80.0 in.
= angle of inclination of diagonal compressive stresses, assumed = 32 (slope of
compression field)
9.6.11.1.1
Angle of Diagonal
Compressive Stresses
The design for shear depends on the angle of diagonal compressive stresses at the section
under consideration. The shear design is an iterative process that begins with assuming a
value for . For this example, only the results of the final cycle of calculations are shown.
9.6.11.1.2
Effective Shear Depth
9.6.11.1.3
Calculation of Critical Section
Figure 9.6.11-1
Critical Section in Shear
of the Center Span
Center line of
bearings
6" 6"
Left end span, 110 ft
73.24"
Critical section
in shear
JUL 03
Using values from Table 9.6.4-1, compute the factored shear force and bending
moment at the critical section for shear (center span point 0.059), according to
Strength I load combinations.
Vu = 1.25(42.3 + 64.6 + 7.8) + 1.50(14.2) + 1.75(137.3) = 405.0 kips
Mu = 1.25(272.7 + 417.1 139.6) + 1.50(244.4) + 1.75(1,717.8) = 2,685.0 ft-kips
or,
Vu = 0.9(42.3 + 64.6 + 7.8) + 1.50(14.2) + 1.75(137.3) = 364.8 kips
Mu = 0.9(272.7 + 417.1 139.6) + 1.50(244.4) + 1.75(1,717.8) = 2,877.6 ft-kips
When determining Mu at a particular section, it is conservative to take Mu as the
highest factored moment that will occur at that section, rather than the moment corresponding to maximum Vu, (LRFD Art. C5.8.3.4.2). Therefore,
Vu = 405.0 kips
Mu = 2,877.6 ft-kips
9.6.11.2
Contribution of Concrete to
Nominal Shear Resistance
9.6.11.2.1
Strain in Flexural Tension
Reinforcement
where
Nu = applied factored normal force at the specified section = 0
Vp = component of the effective prestressing force in the direction of the applied
shear = (force per strand)(number of draped strands)(sin )
Force per strand = 23.4 kips
From Section 9.6.7.5, = 7.2
Vp = (23.4)(12)sin7.2 = 35.2 kips
fpo = a parameter taken as modulus of elasticity of prestressing tendons multiplied
by the locked-in difference in strain between the prestressing tendons and
the surrounding concrete (ksi). For pretensioned members, LRFD Article
C5.8.3.4.2 indicates that fpo can be taken as the stress in the strands when
the concrete is cast around them, which is the jacking stress, fpj, or 0.75fpu.
= 0.75(270.0) = 202.5 ksi
Aps = area of prestressing steel on the flexural tension side of the member.
The flexural tension side of the member should be taken as the half-depth
containing the flexural tension zone as illustrated in LRFD Figure
5.8.3.4.2-3.
Aps = 12(0.153) = 1.836 in.2
As = area of nonprestressing steel on the flexural tension side of the member
= 15.52 in.2
JUL 03
2,877.6 (12)
+ 0 + 0.5(405.0 35.2)(cot 32) 1.836(202.5)
73.24
x =
= +0.394 x 10-3
2[29,000(15.52) + 28,500(1.836)]
9.6.11.2.1.1
Shear Stress
vu =
Vu Vp
b v d v
where
vu = shear stress in concrete
bv = effective web width of the beam = 6 in.
Vp = component of the effective prestressing force in the direction of the applied
shear (calculated in Sect. 9.6.11.2.1)
vu =
405.0 0.9(35.2)
= 0.944 ksi
(0.9)(6)(73.24)
9.6.11.2.3
Concrete Contribution
Having computed x and vu/f c, find a better estimate of from LRFD Table 5.8.3.4.2-1.
Since the computed value of vu/f c is likely to fall between two rows in the table, a linear interpolation may be performed. However, for hand calculations, interpolation is
not recommended (LRFD Art. C5.8.3.4.2). The values of in the lower row that
bounds the computed value may be used. Similarly, the values of in the first column to the right of the computed value may be used. For this example, the applicable row and column are the ones labeled 0.150 and 0.50, respectively. The
values of and contained in the cell of intersection of that row and column are:
= 32.1 which is close to assumed of 32.0.
Thus, no further iteration is needed. However, if the designer desires to go through
further iteration, it should be kept in mind that the position of the critical section of
shear and consequently the values of Vu and Mu will need to be based on the new
value of , 32.1.
= 2.36
where = a factor indicating the ability of diagonally cracked concrete to transmit
tension; a value indicating concrete contribution.
The nominal shear resisted by the concrete is:
Vc = 0.0316 f c b v d v
9.6.11.3.2
Required Area of
Reinforcement
Vu/ Vn = Vc + Vs + Vp
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-1]
where
Vs = shear force carried by transverse reinforcement
= (Vu/) Vc Vp = (405.0/0.9) 86.7 35.2 = 328.1 kips
Vs =
where
Av = area of shear reinforcement within a distance s, in.2
s = spacing of stirrups, in.
fy = yield strength of shear reinforcement, ksi
= angle of inclination of transverse reinforcement to longitudinal axis = 90
Therefore, area of shear reinforcement (in.2) within a spacing, s, is:
reqd Av = (sVs)/(fydvcot )
= s(328.1)/(60)(73.24cot 32) = 0.047(s) in.2
if s = 12 in., the required Av = 0.56 in.2
Try #5 double legs @ 12 in. spacing.
12
Av provided = (2)(0.31) = 0.62 in.2/ft > Av required = 0.56 in.2/ft
12
Vs provided =
9.6.11.3.3
Spacing of Reinforcement
O.K.
(0.62)(60)(73.24)cot 32
= 363.2 kips
12
vu = 0.944 ksi
Since vu > 0.125f c
Then s 12 in. 0.4dv = 0.4(73.24) = 29.3 in.
Therefore, s 12 in.
Actual spacing, s = 12 in. O.K.
9.6.11.3.4
Minimum Reinforcement
Requirement
O.K.
JUL 03
9.6.11.4
Maximum Nominal
Shear Resistance
In order to ensure that the concrete in the web of the beam will not crush prior to
yielding of the transverse reinforcement, the LRFD Specifications give an upper limit
of Vn.
Vn = 0.25f cbvdv + Vp
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-2]
Comparing this equation with LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-2, it can be concluded that,
Vc + Vs 0.25f cbvdv
86.7 + 328.1 = 414.8 kips 0.25(7.0)(6)(73.24) = 769.0 kips O.K.
Using the foregoing procedures, the transverse reinforcement can be determined at
increments along the entire length of the beam.
9.6.12
INTERFACE SHEAR
TRANSFER
9.6.12.1
Factored Horizontal Shear
At the strength limit state, the horizontal shear at a section on a per unit basis can be
taken as:
V
Vh = u
(LRFD Eq. C5.8.4.1-1)
dv
where
Vh = horizontal factored shear force per unit length of the beam, kips/in.
Vu = factored shear force due to superimposed loads, kips
dv = distance between resultants of tensile and compressive forces, (de a/2)
The LRFD Specifications does not identify the location of the critical section. For
convenience, it will be assumed here to be the same location as the critical section for
vertical shear, at point 0.059 of the center span.
Using load combination Strength I:
Vu = 1.25(7.8) + 1.50(14.2) + 1.75(137.3) = 271.3 kips
dv = 73.24 in.
Required Vh =
9.6.12.2
Required Nominal
Resistance
9.6.12.3
Required Interface Shear
Reinforcement
271.3
= 3.70 kips/in.
73.24
JUL 03
Pc
fy
For concrete placed against clean, hardened concrete with the surface intentionally roughened:
[LRFD Art. 5.8.4.2]
c
= 0.1 ksi
= 1.0
where = 1.0 for normal weight concrete
The actual contact width, bv, between the deck and the beam is 42 in. Therefore,
Acv = (42 in.)(1 in.) = 42 in.2/in.
LRFD Eq. 5.8.4.1-1 can be solved for Avf as follows:
4.12 = 0.1(42) + 1.0[Avf (60) + 0]
Avf < 0
Since the resistance provided by cohesion is higher than the applied force, provide the minimum required interface reinforcement.
9.6.12.3.1
Minimum Interface Shear
Reinforcement
From the design of vertical shear reinforcement, a #5 double-leg bar at 12-in. spacing
is provided from the beam extending into the deck. Therefore, Avf = 0.62 in.2/ft.
Avf = (0.62 in.2/ft) > (0.05bv)/fy = 0.05(42)/60 = 0.035 in.2/in. = 0.42 in.2/ft O.K.
Consider further that LRFD Article 5.8.4.1 states that the minimum reinforcement
requirement may be waived if Vn/A cv < 0.100 ksi.
4.11 kips/in./42.0 in. = 0.098 ksi < 0.100 ksi
Therefore, the minimum reinforcement requirement could be waived had it governed.
9.6.12.4
Maximum Nominal Shear
Resistance
9.6.13
MINIMUM
LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT
REQUIREMENT
0.62
JUL 03
This reason that the longitudinal reinforcement requirement is relaxed for this condition, is based on the following explanation. At maximum moment locations, the
shear force changes sign and, hence, the inclination of the diagonal compressive
stresses also changes. At direct supports and point loads, this change of inclination is
associated with a fan-shaped pattern of compressive stresses radiating from the point
load or the direct support. This fanning of the diagonal stresses reduces the tension
in the longitudinal reinforcement caused by the shear, i.e., angle becomes steeper.
The conditions mentioned above exist at the interior supports. Directly over the support, the angle becomes 90 and the contribution of shear to the longitudinal reinforcement requirement is zero. Therefore, at this location, the longitudinal reinforcement is sized only for the moment applied to the section and there is no need to
check the minimum longitudinal reinforcement requirement.
However, for sections within a distance of (dvcot)/2 from the interior supports, the
shear will again affect the required longitudinal reinforcement and the requirement
must be checked. It should be noted that at locations near the interior supports of
continuous members, the minimum longitudinal reinforcement requirement is used
to check the quantity of reinforcement in the deck. The longitudinal reinforcement
requirement must also be checked for the prestressing strands at the simply-supported ends of continuous span units. Refer to Design Example 9.4, Section 9.4.13.
9.6.14
PRETENSIONED
ANCHORAGE ZONE
9.6.14.1
Anchorage Zone
Reinforcement
JUL 03
9.6.14.2
Confinement
Reinforcement
9.6.15
DEFLECTION
AND CAMBER
9.6.15.1
Deflection Due
to Prestressing Force
at Transfer
Pi e cL2 e a 2
E ciI 8
6
where
Pi = total prestressing force at transfer = 44(28.2) = 1,240.8 kips
ec = eccentricity of prestressing force at midspan = 30.78 in.
e = difference between eccentricity of prestressing force at midspan and end, as
shown in Figure 9.6.15.1-1
= ec ee = 30.78 19.42 = 11.36 in.
a = distance from end of beam to harp point = 35.5 ft
L = beam length = 119.0 ft
Figure 9.6.15.1-1
Strand Eccentricity
Psi
Psi
e'
a = 35.5'
48'
a = 35.5'
119'
9.6.15.2
Deflection Due
to Beam Self-Weight
p =
= 3.79 in.
4, 496(545,894)
8
6
g =
5wL4
384E ciI
JUL 03
0.799
4
5
(119x12)
12
g =
= 1.47 in.
(384)(4, 496)(545,894)
Deflection due to beam self-weight at erection:
L = span length between centerlines of bearings = 118 ft
9.6.15.3
Deflection Due to
Haunch and Deck
0.799
4
5
(118 x 12)
12
g =
= 1.42 in.
(384)(4, 496)(545,894)
s =
5wL4
384E cI
where
w = deck slab plus haunch weights, kip/ft
L = span length between centerlines of bearings, ft
Ec = modulus of elasticity of precast beam at 28 days
9.6.15.4
Deflection Due to Barrier
and Future Wearing Surface
9.6.15.5
Deflection and
Camber Summary
1.222
4
5
(118 x 12)
12
s =
= 1.93 in.
(384)(5,072)(545,894)
b+ws = 0.048 in.
(This value was calculated using a continuous beam program.)
For midspan:
At transfer, (p + g) = 3.79 1.47 = 2.32 in.
Total deflection at erection, using PCI multipliers (see the PCI Design Handbook)
= 1.8(3.79) 1.85(1.42) = 4.20 in.
Long-Term Deflection
LRFD Article 5.7.3.6.2 states that the long-term deflection may be taken as the
instantaneous deflection multiplied by a factor of 4.0, if the instantaneous deflection
is based on the gross moment of inertia. However, a factor of 4.0 is not appropriate
for this type of precast construction. Therefore, it is recommended that the designer
follow the guidelines of the owner agency for whom the bridge is being designed, or
undertake a more rigorous time-dependent analysis.
9.6.15.6
Deflection Due to Live
Load and Impact
Live load deflection is not a required check, according to the provisions of the LRFD
Specifications. Further, live load deflections are usually not a problem for prestressed
concrete I- and bulb-tee shapes especially when they are constructed to act as a continuous structure under superimposed loads. If the designer chooses to check deflection, the following recommendations are from the LRFD Specifications.
Live load deflection limit: Span/800 = (120)(12)/800 = 1.80 in. [LRFD Art. 2.5.2.6.2]
JUL 03
If the owner invokes the optional live load deflection criteria specified in LRFD
Article 2.5.2.6.2, the deflection is the greater of:
[LRFD Art. 3.6.1.3.2]
that resulting from the design truck alone, or,
that resulting from 25% of the design truck taken together with the design lane
load
The LRFD Specifications state that all beams may be assumed to be deflecting equally under the applied live load and impact.
[LRFD Art. 2.5.2.6.2]
Therefore, the distribution factor for deflection is calculated as follows:
(number of lanes/number of beams) = 3/4 = 0.75
[LRFD Art. C2.5.2.6.2]
However, it is more conservative to use the distribution factor for moment.
The live load deflection may be conservatively estimated using the following formula:
D=
5L2
M s 0.1(M a + M b )
48EI c
(Eq. 9.6.15.6-1)
where
= the maximum positive moment
Ms
Ma and Mb = the corresponding negative moments at the ends of the span being
considered.
The live load combination specified in LRFD Article 3.6.1.3.2 calls for the greater of
design truck alone or 0.25 design truck plus lane load.
In this example, a conservative approximation may be made by using the positive
moment for Service III load combination, 0.8 truck plus lane load, and by ignoring
the effect of Ma and Mb.
L =
5(120 x 12) 2
0.8 x 2,115.0 x 12 = 0.79 in. < 1.80 in.
48(5,072)(1,097, 252)
O.K.
JUL 03