Pythagorean Triples
Pythagorean Triples
3, 5, AND 7
FRED BARNES
7
5
0
12
3
1. introduction
Its well known that if (a, b, c) is a a Pythagorean triple, that is, if (a, b, c) is a
solution in positive integers to the 90 degree triangle equation a2 + b2 = c2 , then
3 and 4 each divides a or b, and 5 divides a, b or c where, of course, (3, 4, 5) is the
smallest such solution.
A 120 degree triple, (a, b, c), is a solution in positive integers to the 120 degree
triangle equation
a2 + b2 2ab cos 120 = a2 + b2 + ab = c2 .
So, naturally, one wonders if a similar relationship exists between the positive integer solutions of 120 degree triangles and the smallest such solution, (3, 5, 7). To
find such a relationship its necessary to look more closely at the 3,4,5-ness of
Pythagorean triangles. We will look at all integer solutions, both positive and
negative.
a2 + b2 = (a)2 + b2 = (a)2 + (b)2 = a2 + (b)2 = c2 .
These 4 solutions are plotted in figure (1).
Hence, if (a,b,c) is a Pythagorean triple, saying 3 divides one of ab, (a)b, (a)(b),
or a(b) is saying 3 divides a or b. And since 3,4,5-ness holds for Primitive triples,
the case is the same for the divisor 4.
1
FRED BARNES
y
(a, b)
(a, b)
a2
b2
90
(a, b)
(a, b)
y
Figure 1. solutions to a 90 degree triangle equation
Note that:
2
(
a
ab
0
12
a+b
b,
b)
a,
(
b
)
b2
(a
+
a b
a2
b)
120
,
(a
b,
b)
(a, a +
b)
(a, a b)
y
Figure 2. solutions to a 120 degree triangle equation
(1)
b = 2mn + n2 ,
and
c = m2 + n2 + mn.
where m and n are relatively prime, positive integers, m > n, and 3 - m n. See
http://www.geocities.com/fredlb37/triples10.pdf for a proof.
If (a, b, c) and (b, a, c) are considered the same solution, then the first 6 primitive
solutions in order of smallest value for c are,
52 + 3 2 + 5 3 = 7 2
82 + 72 + 8 7 = 132
162 + 52 + 16 5 = 192
242 + 112 + 24 11 = 312
332 + 72 + 33 7 = 372
352 + 132 + 35 13 = 432
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Notice that, in each case, 3 and 5, each, divides one of a, b, or a+b, and 7 divides
one of a, b, a + b, or c.
Claim 1. If (a, b, c) is any 120 degree triple then 3 and 5 divides ab(a + b), and 7
divides ab(a + b)c.
Proof. Its sufficient to show its true for primitive triples. This claim can be proven
directly by looking at residues modulo 3, 5, and 7; however it gets quite messy for
the divisor 7. So, instead, I will use the parametric equations from (1) and the
following result from Fermats little theorem. That is, if s and t are integers, and
p is a prime, then
= mn m2 n2 2 m2 + n2 5mn
= 2mn m4 n4 5 m4 n2 m2 n4 ,
and
= 2mn m6 n6 7 m6 n2 m5 n3 + m3 n5 m2 n6 .
Therefore, from Fermats little theorem, 3 and 5 divide ab(a + b), and 7 divides
ab(a + b)c.
FRED BARNES
2.1. 120 degree triples and their associated 60 degree triples. A 60 degree
triple, (p, q, r), is a solution in positive integers to the 60 degree triangle equation
p2 + q 2 2pq cos 60 = p2 + q 2 pq = r2 .
Note that
a2 + b2 + ab = (a + b)2 + b2 (a + b)b = a2 + (a + b)2 a(a + b).
Hence, if (a, b, c) is a 120 degree triple then (a + b, b, c) and (a, a + b, c) are 60 degree
triples. Here is a neat way to construct these three triangles.
C
b
b
0
12
a
a
b
B a
60
E
b
60
(6)
212 + 52 21 5 = 192
(7)
212 + 162 21 16 = 192
Notice that, in each case, 3 and 5, each, divides one of u, v, or u v, and 7
divides one of u, v, u v, or w.
Claim 2. If (u, v, w) is any 60 degree triple then 3 and 5 divides uv(u v), and 7
divides uv(u v)w.
Proof. Its sufficient to show the claim is true for primitive triples. Clearly its true
for the triple (1, 1, 1). So let u2 + v 2 uv = w2 where (u, v, w) is a primitive triple,
uvw 6= 1. Without loss of generality, let u be greater than v, then
(u v)2 + v 2 + (u v)v = u2 + v 2 uv = w2 .
Hence (u v, v, w) is a 120 degree triple. So, from claim (1),
The drawing below shows two 60 degree triangles AEC and ADC along with
their associated 120 degree triangle ABC.
v
v
60
60
20
uv 1
E
v