0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views

Eetd WSN Basics 2 Dist

The document discusses the fundamentals of wireless sensor networks. It covers key topics such as network lifetime, wireless networking, wireless communication using radio frequency transceivers, and interoperability. Specifically, it addresses challenges such as limited battery lifetime, unreliable wireless links, lack of common communication standards, and other technical issues that have prevented widespread adoption of wireless sensor networks. The document provides an overview of these fundamental concepts to understand the field without focusing on specific applications, technologies, or protocols.

Uploaded by

yabhi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views

Eetd WSN Basics 2 Dist

The document discusses the fundamentals of wireless sensor networks. It covers key topics such as network lifetime, wireless networking, wireless communication using radio frequency transceivers, and interoperability. Specifically, it addresses challenges such as limited battery lifetime, unreliable wireless links, lack of common communication standards, and other technical issues that have prevented widespread adoption of wireless sensor networks. The document provides an overview of these fundamental concepts to understand the field without focusing on specific applications, technologies, or protocols.

Uploaded by

yabhi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

Wireless Sensor Network

Fundamentals
Steven Lanzisera
Environmental Energy Technologies Division, LBNL
8 February 2010
2

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
3

What We Won’t Discuss

• Particular applications
• Jargon soup
– IEEE 802.15.4, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n
– Zigbee, Bluewave, etc.
• Companies and their technologies
– Dust Networks, Arch Rock, Sensicast, etc.
• Specific protocols
• Latency, feedback control, etc.
4

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
5

Wireless Sensor Networks: Vision

• Ubiquitous connectivity
• “Smart” everything
• Incredibly cheap
• Last for years
6

Wireless Can Change Everything

Adapted from K. Pister, UC Berkeley / Dust Networks


7

Industrial Process Monitoring


8

B90 Monitoring Network

• ~40 wireless sensor nodes


• Provide power meter and temperature data
• Adding ~40 nodes from Sensicast (separate network)

Dave Watson et al.


9

Why Aren’t They Everywhere?


• Data reliability (% of data that gets to the server)
– Typical research grade network: ~80%
– Best in class: >99.9%
– Network stability, packet loss, etc
• Interoperability, ease of use
– No two major companies can talk
• Network lifetime
– Multi-year lifetime promised
– Several month lifetime often realized
• Poor market experiences
10

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
11

Battery Powered Nodes

• Virtually every node uses a battery


• Mains power is expensive & annoying
• Energy harvesting is vaporware
• Lifetime must be years
– Real cost is in labor to deploy, maintain
– Cost to replace 500 batteries each month?
12

Energy in Wireless Sensor Networks

• Basic networks listen all the time (Zigbee, etc)


• 5 day lifetime with best in class AA batteries
Turn the radio off!
• 1% duty cycle gives 500 days
• But how do you know when to turn it on?
Much of WSN research has focused on energy
• How to make radios consume less power
• How to determine when to turn the radio on
13

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
14

The Network Stack

• The network stack is about abstraction


• Provide standard interfaces so you can work at
one layer without knowledge of everything else


Application Layer Application protocol (HTTP, FTP, etc)
Transport Layer Data reliability, flow control (TCP, UDP, etc)


Internet Layer Routing (IP)


Link Layer Medium access, data reliability, flow control
Physical Layer Bits in the air or on a wire

15

Payload, Headers, & Packets

payload
header

Application Application
 
Transport Transport
 
Network Network
 
Link Link
 
Physical Physical
 
16

Link Layer

• Often interchangeable with Medium Access


Control (MAC)
– When (or where) to send data
– Dealing with contention
– Low level addressing (hardware address)
17

MAC: Aloha
• All devices at the same frequency all the time
• If you need to talk, send a packet, otherwise, listen
• Only works with extremely low traffic loads

• Two problems
– Radio is always on (poor lifetime)
– Collisions cause data loss
18

MAC: Preamble Sampling


• Nodes sleep most of the time (radio off)
• Wake up to listen once in a while
• When they need to talk, they send a long preamble
• Nodes hear preamble, stay awake, get packet
• Contention is a problem
19

MAC: Carrier Sense Multiple Access

• Carrier Sense Multiple Access is CSMA


– Listen to hear if the channel is busy
– If no, transmit your packet
– If yes, wait awhile and check again
• Designed for wired
– Everyone can hear everyone else
– What if they can’t all hear one another?
20

Hidden Terminal In Wireless Networks


21

MAC: Time Division Multiple Access


• Each node assigned a time to talk
– No contention
– Nodes must know when to wake up to listen
– Entire network must be time synchronized
– Frequency hopping is almost free
22

Internet Layer

• Routing packets from source to destination


– Defines logical network connections
– Determines which physical links to use
• Wired networks have stable links
– Define a path from A to B and it will work later too
– Send a packet and it will most likely get there
• Wireless networks can have unstable links
– Links come and go over time
– Packet delivery rates on good links are low
23

Network Topologies

Tree Network Topology


24

Network Topologies

Mesh Network Topology


25

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network Lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
26

Wireless Communication: 10km View

• B sends energy with information to A


– Environment, design determines the energy required
• A & B must speak the same basic language
– Carrier frequency
– Modulation (OOK, AM, FM, etc)
27

How to Get Data From B to A


 Energy per bit 
Capacity  Bandwidth  log 2 1  Efficiency  
 Noise Energy 
Bits/second Hertz Modulation Signal to
(1/seconds) Constant (≤1) Noise Ratio
(Unitless) (Unitless)

• Enough energy must be received to decode data

• The modulation determines:


– The bandwidth
– The efficiency
28

Signal Propagation

• Radio waves travel from B as an


electromagnetic wave
– Just like light, travels at 3x108 m/s
• EM wave is a sinusoid in both time, space

Distance, Time
29

Signal Propagation: Free Space

• Transmitted power is spread over a sphere


• Power falls off with surface area
PTX
PRX  2
R
• Communication range up to 1km?
– Usually calculated using this theory
– Even outdoors this is far from a good estimate
30

Signal Propagation: Indoors

• Radio waves bounce off and go through objects


• Interference occurs at receiver
• Unpredictable, geometry dependent
31

Signal Propagation: Fading

½ wavelength
log(RF Power)

Distance from Wall


32

Combating Fading
• Diversity in space or frequency
• Spatial diversity: multiple antennas
Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Watteyne, Lanzisera, Mehta, Pister, ICC 2010


33

Combating Fading
• Diversity in space or frequency
• Spatial diversity: multiple antennas
• Frequency diversity
– Wideband modulation (WiFi, CDMA cellphones)
– Frequency hopping (Bluetooth)
34

Fading and Diversity

ch.11 ch.12 ch.19 ch.20

ch.13 ch.14 ch.21 ch.22


Diversity improves performance

ch.15 ch.16 ch.23 ch.24

ch.17 ch.18 ch.25 ch.26


35

Wireless Communication Key Points

• Communication range is not a sphere


• Lots of things cause this
– Multipath fading
• Diversity can help
– Space: multiple antennas
– Frequency: channel hopping
36

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
37

Radios of the World


38

RF Transceivers

• Sensitivity better than 1pW (-90dBm) common


• Dynamic range of 109 to 1013 common
– Equal to or better than human hearing, eye sight
– Can see bright things or dim things but not both

Yet, we find that we can only communicate several


meters.
39

Transceiver Design
Analog to
Baseband Low Noise
Digital Mixer
Filter Amplifier
Converter

Data
Synthesizer

Antenna
Digital to Baseband Mixer Power
Analog Filter Amplifier
Converter
40

Power in Transceivers

• Large power overhead


– Dominates in low
power systems
• Non-ideal power amp
– Efficiency 15% - 50%
– 1W (30 dBm) out of antenna takes 5W out of battery!
• Low noise amplifier: ½ the noise = 4x the power
• Total power in TX and RX about the same in WSN
– PA changes this so that PTX >> PRX
41

Silicon Implementation

4% Increase

Kluge, ISSCC 2006


42

Things That Mess Up Communication

• Noise

• Interference Relative Noise Power

2.4 GHz
PHY Channels 11-26 5 MHz

2.4 GHz 2.4835 GHz


43

Overview

• Wireless sensor networks


• The fundamentals
– Network lifetime
– Wireless networking
– Wireless communication
– The radio frequency transceiver
• Interoperability
44

Interoperability

• Normally not all layers need to be the same


– Two computers can talk even if one is wireless and
one is wired
• But we want to buy a sensor node from A and
use it in a wireless network from B
– Need several layers to be the same
– Physical, link and network layers
45

Interoperability

• Physical layer is standard (IEEE 802.15.4)


• Link layer is not standard
– Even the standard contains several choices
• Network layer is becoming standard (6loWPAN)
– Glue between link and network layer is not standard
• Devices continue to not work together
– Vendors trying to decide what to do
– But there is some hope…
46

Summary

• We can provide reliable networking today


• Wireless communication is difficult
• What you use today will not be interoperable
• Not all networks created equal

You might also like