11 Major Problems of

Urbanisation in India
by Smriti Chand Urbanisation

Advertisements:

Some of the major problems of urbanisation in India are 1. Urban

Sprawl 2. Overcrowding 3. Housing 4. Unemployment 5. Slums and
Squatter Settlements 6. Transport 7. Water 8. Sewerage Problems 9.
Trash Disposal 10. Urban Crimes 11. Problem of Urban Pollution!

Image Courtesy : upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Poor_part_of_Chennai.JPG

Although India is one of the less urbanized countries of the world with only
27.78 per cent of her population living in urban agglomerations/towns, this
country is facing a serious crisis of urban growth at the present time.

Whereas urbanisation has been an instrument of economic, social and

political progress, it has led to serious socio-economic problems.
The sheer magnitude of the urban population, haphazard and unplanned
growth of urban areas, and a desperate lack of infrastructure are the main
causes of such a situation. The rapid growth of urban population both
natural and through migration, has put heavy pressure on public utilities like
housing, sanitation, transport, water, electricity, health, education and so
on.
Poverty, unemployment and under employment among the rural
immigrants, beggary, thefts, dacoities, burglaries and other social evils are
on rampage. Urban sprawl is rapidly encroaching the precious agricultural
land. The urban population of India had already crossed the 285 million
mark by 2001. By 2030, more than 50 per cent of Indias population is
expected to live in urban areas. Following problems need to be highlighted.

1. Urban Sprawl:
Urban sprawl or real expansion of the cities, both in population and
geographical area, of rapidly growing cities is the root cause of urban
problems. In most cities the economic base is incapable of dealing with the
problems created by their excessive size. Massive immigration from rural
areas as well as from small towns into big cities has taken place almost
consistently; thereby adding to the size of cities.

Image Courtesy : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Scottsdale_cityscape4.jpg

The first large flow of migration from rural to urban areas was during the
depression of late 1930s when people migrated in search of jobs. Later,
during the decade 1941-51, another a million persons moved to urban
places in response to wartime industrialisation and partition of the country
in 1947.
During 1991-2001, well over 20 million people migrated to cities. The
greatest pressure of the immigrating population has been felt in the central
districts of the city (the old city) where the immigrants flock to their relatives

and friends before they search for housing. Population densities beyond
the old city decline sharply.
Brush (1968) has referred to this situation in the central parts of the cities
as urban impulsion which results from concentration of people in the
centre of the city close to their work and shopping. Incidentally many of the
fastest growing urban centres are large cities.
This is due to the fact that such large cities act as magnets and attract
large number of immigrants by dint of their employment opportunities and
modern way of life. Such hyperurbanisation leads to projected cities sizes
of which defy imagination. Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore,
etc. are examples of urban sprawl due to large scale migration of people
from the surrounding areas.
In several big cities wealthy people are constantly moving from the
crowded centres of the cities to the more pleasant suburbs where they can
build larger houses and enjoy the space and privacy of a garden around
the house. In some cities, the outskirts are also added to by squatters who
build makeshift shacks of unused land although they have no legal right to
the land. The difficulty of restricting town growth in either case is immense
and most towns and cities are surrounded by wide rings of suburbs.
Historically suburbs have grown first along the major roads leading into the
town. This type of growth is known as ribbon settlement. Such sites are first
to be developed because of their location near the road gives them greater
accessibility. But soon the demand for suburban homes causes the land
between ribbon settlements to be built and made accessible by
constructing new roads.

This type of development is known as infil. Simultaneously small towns

and villages within the commuting distance of major cities are also
developed for residential purposes. In this way towns are continuously
growing and in some areas the suburbs of a number of neighbouring towns
may be so close together as to form an almost continuous urban belt which
is called conurbation. Urban sprawl is taking place at the cost of valuable
agricultural land.

2. Overcrowding:
Overcrowding is a situation in which too many people live in too little space.
Overcrowding is a logical consequence of over-population in urban areas. It
is naturally expected that cities having a large size of population squeezed
in a small space must suffer from overcrowding. This is well exhibited by
almost all the big cities of India.

Image Courtesy : totallycoolpix.com/wp-content/uploads/022.jpg

For example, Mumbai has one-sixth of an acre open space per thousand
populations though four acre is suggested standard by the Master Plan of
Greater Mumbai. Metropolitan cities of India are overcrowded both in
absolute and relative terms. Absolute in the sense that these cities have a
real high density of population; relative in the sense that even if the
densities are not very high the problem of providing services and other
facilities to the city dwellers makes it so.

Delhi has a population density of 9,340 persons per sq km (Census 2001)

which is the highest in India. This is the overall population density for the
Union territory of Delhi. Population density in central part of Delhi could be
much higher. This leads to tremendous pressure on infrastructural facilities
like housing, electricity, water, transport, employment, etc. Efforts to
decongest Delhi by developing ring towns have not met with the required
success.

3. Housing:
Overcrowding leads to a chronic problem of shortage of houses in urban
areas. This problem is specifically more acute in those urban areas where
there is large influx of unemployed or underemployed immigrants who have
no place to live in when they enter cities/towns from the surrounding areas.

Image Courtesy : mhupa.gov.in/NEW%20WEB/nchf1.jpg

An Indian Sample Survey in 1959 indicated that 44 per cent of urban

households (as compared to 34 per cent of rural families) occupied one
room or less. In larger cities the proportion of families occupying one room
or less was as high as 67 per cent. (Roy Turner, 1962).
Moreover, the current rate of housing construction is very slow which
makes the problem further complicated. Indian cities require annually about

2.5 million new devellings but less than 15 per cent of the requirement is
being constructed.
The Census of India 2001 concluded the first ever and the largest survey of
household amenities and assets which points a never-before profile of
problem relating to housing in India. The outcome is both instructive and
amusing. Taking India as whole, there are 179 million residential houses,
i.e., about six people to each house.
Thirty-nine per cent of all married couples in India (about 86 million) do not
have an independent room to themselves. As many as 35 per cent (18.9
million) urban families live in one-room houses.
For about a third of urban Indian families, a house does not include a
kitchen, a bathroom, a toiletand in many cases there is no power and
water supply. Only 79 per cent (42.6 million) urban household live in
permanent (pucca) houses. 67 per cent (36 million) of the urban houses
are owned by the households while 29 per cent (15 million) are rented.
Several factors are responsible for the above mentioned sad state of affairs
with respect to housing problems faced by the urban people. The major
factors are shortage of building materials and financial resources,
inadequate expansion of public utilities into sub-urban areas, poverty and
unemployment of urban immigrants, strong caste and family ties and lack
of adequate transportation to sub-urban areas where most of the vacant
land for new construction is located.

4. Unemployment:
The problem of unemployment is no less serious than the problem of
housing mentioned above. Urban unemployment in India is estimated at 15

to 25 per cent of the labour force. This percentage is even higher among
the educated people.

Image Courtesy : 1.bp.blogspot.com/_DWI6YpRnBgY/S8ragXw7fII/DSC03841.JPG

It is estimated that about half of all educated urban unemployed are

concentrated in four metropolitan cities (Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and

Chennai). Furthermore, although urban incomes are higher than the rural
incomes, they are appallingly low in view of high cost of living in urban
areas.
One of the major causes of urban unemployment is the large scale
migration of people from rural to urban areas. Rural-urban migration has
been continuing for a pretty long time but it has not always been as great a
problem as it is today. The general poverty among the rural people pushes
them out to urban areas to migrate in search of livelihood and in the hope
of a better living.
But the growth of economic opportunities fails to keep pace with the
quantum of immigration. The limited capacity of urban areas could not
create enough employment opportunities and absorb the rapid growth of
the urban labour force. Efforts made by the central and the state
governments to create employment opportunities in rural areas and to
check the large scale rural-urban migration have not met with much
success.

5. Slums and Squatter Settlements:

The natural sequel of unchecked, unplanned and haphazard growth of
urban areas is the growth and spread of slums and squatter settlements
which present a striking feature in the ecological structure of Indian cities,
especially of metropolitan centres.

Image Courtesy : cuwhist.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/slum1.jpg

The rapid urbanisation in conjunction with industrialisation has resulted in

the growth of slums. The proliferation of slums occurs due to many factors,
such as, the shortage of developed land for housing, the high prices of land

beyond the reach of urban poor, a large influx of rural migrants to the cities
in search of jobs etc.
In spite of several efforts by the Central and State Governments to contain
the number of slum dwellers, their growth has been increasing sharply
exerting tremendous pressure on the existing civic amenities and social
infrastructure.
In India Slums have been defined under section 3 of Slum Areas
(Improvement and Clearance) Act 1956. As areas where buildings:
(i) Area in any respect unfit for human habitation.
(ii) Area by reason of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrangement and
design of such buildings, narrowness or faulty arrangement of streets, lack
of ventilation, light, sanitation facilities or any combination of these factors,
which are detrimental to safety, health and morals.
The following criteria characterises an area as Slum:
(i) All areas notified Slum by state govt. under any Act.
(ii) All areas recognised as slum by state govt. which have not been
formally notified as slum under any Act.
(iii) A compact area of at least 300 populations or about 60-70 households
of poorly built congested tenements in unhygienic environment usually with
inadequate infrastructure and lacking in proper sanitary and drinking water
facilities.
Socially, slums tend to be isolated from the rest of the urban society and
exhibit pathological social symptoms (drug abuse, alcoholism, crime,
vandalism and other deviant behaviour). The lack of integration of slum

inhabitants into urban life reflects both, the lack of ability and cultural
barriers.
Thus the slums are not just huts and dilapidated buildings but are occupied
by people with complexities of social-networks, sharp socio-economic
stratification, dualistic group and segregated spatial structures.
In India, slums are one or two-room hutments mostly occupying
government and public lands. The houses in slums are built in mud or brick
walls, low roofs mostly covered with corrugated sheets, tins, bamboo mats,
polythenes, gunny bags and thatches, devoid of windows and ventilators
and public utility services.
Slums have invariably extreme unhygienic conditions. They have
impoverished lavatories made by digging shallow pit in between three or
four huts and with sackcloth as a curtain, hanging in front. When the pit
overflows excreta gets spread over the surrounding area and is rarely
cleaned.
The children cultivate the habit of defecating anywhere in the slum area.
Slums have practically no drains and are marked by cesspools and
puddles. Piped water is not available to slum dwellers and they mainly
depend upon shallow hand-pumps for water supply.
Such handpumps are generally dug in the middle of a stale dirty pool.
People wash their clothes and utensils under the handpumps. The entire
muck around the handpump percolates into the ground and contaminates
the ground water. This contaminated ground water is taken out through the
handpump which adversely affects the health of the slum dwellers.

Consequently people suffer from water-borne diseases like blood

dysentery, diarrhoea, malaria, typhoid, jaundice, etc. These diseases stalk
the people all the year round. Children with bloated bellies or famished
skeletons, many suffering from polio, are a common sight. Most of the
slums are located near drains (Nullahs) which contain filthy stagnant water.
Billions of flies and mosquitoes swarming over these drains cause
infectious diseases. These drains are used as open lavatories by the
inhabitants and are always choked. Such drains (Nullahs) pose serious
threat to health of the people.
Slums are known by different names in different cities. They are called
bustees in Kolkata, jhuggi- jhoparies in Delhi, Jhoparpattis or Chawl in
Mumbai and Cheri in Chennai.

Squatter Settlements:
No clear-cut distinction can be drawn between slums and squatter
settlements in practice except that slums are relatively more stable and are
located in older, inner parts of cities compared to squatter settlements
which are relatively temporary and are often scattered in all parts of the
city, especially outer zones where urban areas merge with their rural
hinterland.
Normally, squatter settlements contain makeshift dwellings constructed
without official permission (i.e., on unauthorised land). Such settlements
are constructed by using any available material such as cardboards, tin,
straw mats or sacks. Squatter settlements are constructed in an
uncontrolled manner and badly lack essential public services such as
water, light, sewage.

Such an environment leads to several health problems. Determining size of

squatter settlement is a difficult job. Some may occur singly or in small
groups of 10-20 dwellings while others occur in huge agglomerations of
thousands of houses. They can occur through organised rapid (almost
overnight) invasions of an area by large number of people or by gradual
accretion, family by family.
Squatter settlements have following three characteristics in common.

Physical Characteristics:
Due to inherent non-legal status, a squatter settlement has services and
infrastructure below the adequate minimum levels. As such water supply,
sanitation, electricity, roads, drainage, schools, health centres, and market
places are either absent or arranged informally.

Social Characteristics:
Most of the squatter households belong to lower income group. They are
predominantly migrants, but many are also second or third generation
squatters.

Legal Characteristics:
Such settlements lack land ownership.
From the above discussion it is clear that squatter refers to legal position of
the settlement and slum refers to the condition of a settlement.
A distinction has to be drawn between squatter settlements and shanty
towns. Illegality of tenure is the hallmark of the squatter settlement but
shanti huts or mean dwellings are defined by their fabric. Shanty towns
result mainly from massive rural-urban migration and from the inability of
city authorities to provide sufficient housing facilities and employment for
the vast influx of people from rural to urban areas.

Indian cities abound with slums which have been termed as eyesores, a
rash on city landscape, a blot on civilization etc. But actually they are
much more health hazards for its unfortunate poverty stricken inhabitants
and also for the city as a whole. The most shocking aspect is that slums
are growing at an accelerated rate.
Census of India, for the first time in 2001, came out with detailed data on
slum population in India. According to data released by Census of India
2001, 607 towns and cities in 26 states/union territories have reported slum
population (Table 14.8).
No slum population has been reported in the remaining nine states/union
territories at the time of Census 2001. Andhra Pradesh has the largest
number of 76 towns reporting slum population. This is followed by Uttar
Pradesh (65), Tamil Nadu (63), Maharashtra (62), West Bengal (51),
Madhya Pradesh (42) and Karnataka (35). Figure 14.6 gives the
distribution of towns with slum population.
The largest slum population of 10.6 million has been reported from
Maharashtra; followed by Andhra Pradesh (5.1 million), Uttar Pradesh (4.1
million), West Bengal (3.8 million), Tamil Nadu (2.5 million), Madhya
Pradesh (2.4 million) and Delhi (2.0 million).
Looking at the percentage of slum population to total population of towns
reporting slum population, Meghalaya with 41.33 per cent tops the list
(Table 14.8 and Figure 14.6). Other states with high percentage of slum
population are Haryana (33.06%), Andhra Pradesh (32.69%), Maharashtra
(31.65%), Chhattisgarh (29.27%) and West Bengal (26.82%). Uttar
Pradesh and Orissa are very close to the all India average of 22.58 per
cent.

A list of 26 million plus cities reporting slum population in 2001 (Municipal

Corporation) is given in table 14.9. As expected, the largest concentration
of slum population is found in four major cities of Greater Mumbai, Delhi
Municipal Corporation (Urban), Kolkata and Chennai. So far as percentage
of slum population to total population of the cities (municipal) is concerned,
Grater

Mumbai with 48.88 per cent of its population consisting of slum dwellers is
the worst suffer.
Dharavi slum in Central Mumbai is the largest slum of Asia. Here some of
the side allays and lanes are so narrow that not even a bicycle can pass.
The whole neighbourhood consists of tenement buildings, two or three
storey high with rusty iron stairways to the upper part, where a single room
is rented by a whole family, sometimes twelve or more people. In this place
of shadow-less, treeless sunlight, uncontrolled garbage, stagnant pools of
foul water, the only non-human creatures are the shining black crows and
long gray rats.
Dharavi was an arm of the sea that was filled by waste, largely produced by
the people who have come to live there. The other cities with over 40 per
cent slum population to the total population (Municipal Corporation) are
Faridabad and Meerut. Kolkata, Nagpur and Thane have about one-third of
their population as slum population.
The most surprising feature of Table 14.9 is that Patna has reported only
0.25 per cent as slum population. There slums to be some omission in
enumerating the slum population of this otherwise dirty city. According to
the report of the Census of India 2001, the slum population of Patna
Municipal Corporation is partial and is being subjected to scrutiny.

6. Transport:
With traffic bottleneck and traffic congestion, almost all cities and towns of
India are suffering from acute form of transport problem. Transport
problems increase and become more complex as the town grows in size.
With its growth, the town performs varied and complex functions and more
people travel to work or shop.

Image Courtesy : alexisimages.com/pixelpost/images/20090407225703_dscf4105a.jpg

As the town becomes larger, even people living within the built-up area
have to travel by car or bus to cross the town and outsiders naturally bring
their cars or travel by public transport. Wherever, trade is important,
commercial vehicles such as vans and trucks will make problem of traffic
more complicated.
Since most of the commercial activities of the towns are concentrated in the
Central Business District (C.B.D.), the centres are areas of greatest

congestion. However, other parts of the town are not free from traffic
congestion.
Such areas include the roads leading to factories, offices, schools, etc.,
which will be thronged with people in morning and evening; minor shopping
centres which grow up in the suburbs; sporting arenas, entertainment
districts which will be busy at night, roads leading to residential and
dormitory towns which will be busy when commuters flock to the cities in
the morning to work and return home in the evenings.
Such congestion becomes greater when the centre is built up in tall
skyscraper blocks whose offices sometimes employ thousands of workers,
because at the end of the office hours everyone leaves the building within a
short space of time to make their way home.
This puts tremendous pressure on public transport and causes journeys to
take much longer period than they normally would. In most cities the rush
hour or peak traffic hour lasts for about two hours and during that period
buses and trains are crammed to capacity, roads are overcrowded with
vehicles and the movement of traffic becomes very slow.
In other towns, the narrowness of the streets, which were built long before
the motorised transport and lack of parking facilities are the main cause of
congestion. Cars may be parked along the edges of the roads restricting
movement to a narrow lane and the multiplicity of narrow streets, sharp
comers and waits to turn into lanes of traffic may slow down the movement
and thus create even greater congestion.
The traffic scenario in almost all the Indian cities presents a pathetic picture
with Mumbai still having the best city transport system and Chennai,
Ahmedabad and Pune being reasonably well served by local transport

system. In all other cities, if one does not own a personal vehicle, great
hardship is experienced in moving about in the city.
Apart from that, the level of incomes and affordability of Indian masses is
very low and the citizens are not able to pay an economic fare for use of
public transport system. Therefore, all city bus services sustain such heavy
losses that they cannot really expand or even maintain a fleet adequately to
meet the city needs.
Moreover, mixture of vehicles causes uncontrollable chaos on the roads.
Free movement of stray cattle and domestic animals on the roads adds to
traffic problem and often cause accidents. Heavy traffic and congestion
leads to slow movement of traffic, fuel wastage environmental pollution and
loss of precious time.
A study of traffic problem in Delhi will acquaint us to traffic scenario in the
rest of urban India. Already there are 44 lakh vehicles on Delhi roads (in
2004) which will almost double by 2021 when the next Master Plan will be
implemented. The road length, however, has not increased proportionately.
The road length per vehicle was 3 km in 1971 which reduced to 2 km in
1981, 1.3 km in 1991, 0.68 km in 1998 and 0.23 km in 2004. Figure 14.7
depicts different aspects of transport infrastructure in Delhi. Urban planners
say that by 2021, going in a car will take longer time than walking.
The guidelines for Delhi Master Plan 2021, allowing mixed land use, multistoreyed structures and regularisation of 24 industrial estates will add to the
citys already congested roads. Disturbing trends have also been indicated
in the Status Report for Delhi, 2021 prepared by the Union Ministry of
Environment and Forests.

Planning Department of Delhi Government also States that despite roads

occupying 21 per cent of the total area of the city, the increase of traffic on
arterial roads is resulting in lower speeds, congestion, intersection delays
and higher pollution level during peak hours.
Some relief is expected with the completion of metro rail. But experts fear
that by the time the metro rail becomes fully operational, the demand for
transport facilities will outpace the capacity of both road and rail transport.

Similar conditions prevail in most of the Indian cities. In Kolkata, metro rail
and Vivekanand Setu were constructed to ease traffic flow. But traffic
congestion in several old localities and near Haora bridge is almost a daily
routine. In Ahmedabad, the speed of vehicles comes down to 5 km/hr on
Gandhi Marg and several other roads due to congestion and overcrowding.

7. Water:
What is one of the most essential elements of nature to sustain life and
right from the beginning of urban civilisation, sites for settlements have
always been chosen keeping in view the availability of water to the

inhabitants of the settlement. However, supply of water started falling short

of demand as the cities grew in size and number.

Image Courtesy : rotarycolumbiamo.org/images/India-Water_Plant/Water%20Tap.jpg

Today we have reached a stage where practically no city in India/ gets

sufficient water to meet the needs of city dwellers. In many cities people get
water from the municipal sources for less than half an hour every alternate
day. In dry summer season, taps remain dry for days together and people
are denied water supply at a time when they need it the most.

The individual towns require water in larger quantities. Many small towns
have no main water supply at all and depend on such sources as individual
tubewells, household open wells or even rivers. Accelerated Urban Water
Supply Programme (AUWSP) was launched to provide water to towns with
population of less than 20,000.
Keeping in view the increased demands for water by the urban population,
Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation
(CPHEEO) fixed 125-200 litres of water per head per day for cities with a
population of more than 50,000, 100-125 litres for population between
10,000 and 50,000 and 70-100 litres for towns with a population below
10,000.
The Zakaria Committee recommended the water requirement per head per
day 204 litres for cities with population between 5 lakh and 2 million and
272 litres for cities with population more than 2 million. This amount of
water is supposed to be used for drinking, kitchen, bathing, cloth washing,
floor and vehicle washing and gardening.
Sadly majority of the cities and towns do not get the recommended quantity
of water. Gap in demand and supply of water in four metro cities, viz.,
Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi and Chennai varies from 10 to 20 per cent. The
condition is still worse in small cities and towns. To meet the growing
demand for water, many cities are trying to tap external sources of water
supply.
Mumbai draws water from neighbouring areas and from sources located as
far as 125 km in the Western Ghats. Chennai uses water express trains to
meets its growing demand for water. Bangalore is located on the plateau

and draws water from Cauvery river at a distance of 100 km. Water for
Bangalore has to be lifted about 700 metres with help of lifting pumps.
Hyderabad depends on Nagarjuna Sagar located 137 km away. Delhi
meets large part of its water requirements from Tajiwala in Haryana. Water
is also drawn from Ramganga as far as 180 km. Under the proposed
scheme it will meet its growing requirements of water from Tehri, Renuka,
and Kishau barrages.

8. Sewerage Problems:
Urban areas in India are almost invariably plagued with insufficient and
inefficient sewage facilities. Not a single city in India is fully sewered.
Resource crunch faced by the municipalities and unauthorised growth of
the cities are two major causes of this pathetic state of affairs.

Image Courtesy : 2.bp.blogspot.com/_T9uOVsPXY1w/TDBuICdLHvI//PIC145.jpg

According to latest estimates, only 35-40 per cent of the urban population
has the privilege of sewage system. Most of the cities have old sewerage
lines which are not looked after properly. Often sewerage lines break down
or they are overflowing.

Most cities do not have proper arrangements for treating the sewerage
waste and it is drained into a nearly river (as in Delhi) or in sea (as in
Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai), thereby polluting the water bodies.
In most Indian cities, water pipes run in close proximity to sewer lines. Any
leakage leads to contamination of water which results in the spread of
several water borne diseases.

9. Trash Disposal:
As Indian cities grow in number and size the problem of trash disposal is
assuming alarming proportions. Huge quantities of garbage produced by
our cities pose a serious health problem. Most cites do not have proper
arrangements for garbage disposal and the existing landfills are full to the
brim. These landfills are hotbeds of disease and innumerable poisons
leaking into their surroundings.

Image Courtesy : cdn.lightgalleries.net/4bd5ebfac5162/images/jw_syringe011-2.jpg

Wastes putrefy in the open inviting disease carrying flies and rats and a
filthy, poisonous liquid, called leachate, which leaks out from below and
contaminates ground water. People who live near the rotting garbage and
raw sewage fall easy victims to several diseases like dysentery, malaria,
plague, jaundice, diarrhoea, typhoid, etc.

10. Urban Crimes:

Modem cities present a meeting point of people from different walks of life
having no affinity with one another. Like other problems, the problem of
crimes increases with the increase in urbanisation. In fact the increasing
trend in urban crimes tends to disturb peace and tranquility of the cities and
make them unsafe to live in particularly for the women.

Image Courtesy : ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/dec_2012_26.jpg

Growing materialism, consumerism, competition in everyday life,

selfishness, lavishness, appalling socio-economic disparities and rising

unemployment and feeling of loneliness in the crowd are some of the

primary causes responsible for alarming trends in urban crime.
Not only the poor, deprived and slum dwellers take to crime; youngsters
from well-to-do families also resort to crime in order to make fast buck and
for meeting requirements of a lavish life. Occasional failures in life also
drag youngsters to crime.
The problem of urban crime is becoming more complicated in the present
day world because criminals often get protection from politicians,
bureaucrats and elite class of the urban society. Some of the criminals
reach high political positions by using their money and muscle power.
According to study made by Dutt and Venugopal (1983), violent urban
crimes like rape, murder, kidnapping, dacoity, robbery, etc. are more
pronounced in the northern-central parts of the country. Even the economic
crimes (like theft, cheating, breach of trust, etc.) are concentrated in the
north- central region. Poverty related crimes are widespread with main
concentration in the cities of Patna, Darbhanga, Gaya and Munger. This
may be due to widespread poverty prevailing in this region.
However, the latest surveys show that Mumbai and Delhi figure in 35 cities
that have high crime rate. As much as 31.8 per cent of citizens in Mumbai
and 30.5 per cent in Delhi have been victims of crime. Sexual assault was
higher in Mumbai (3.5 per cent) as compared to Delhi (1.7 per cent). Both
cities score poorly in corruption, with 22.9% in Mumbai being exposed to
bribery as compared to 21% in Delhi.

11. Problem of Urban Pollution:

With rapid pace of urbanisation, industries and transport systems grow

rather out of proportion. These developments are primarily responsible for
pollution of environment, particularly the urban environment.

Image Courtesy : upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Trafficjamdelhi.jpg

We cannot think of strong India, economically, socially and culturally, when

our cities remain squalor, quality of urban life declines and the urban
environment is damaged beyond repair. As a matter of fact, cities comprise
the backbone of economic expansion and urbanization is being seen in a
positive light as an engine of economic growth and agent of socio-political
transformation.
The share of urban areas in the total national economic income had been
estimated at 60 per cent and the per capita income was about three times
higher than rural per capita income. But this is not sufficient partly, due to
high cost of living and partly, because of growing economic disparity in
urban areas. Rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming poorer.
Several steps have been initiated to meet the challenges posed by urban
crisis but with little or no success.
National Commission on Urbanization (NCU) has, in its policy proposal of
1988, stressed the need for (a) the evolution of a spatial pattern of
economic development and hierarchies of human settlements, (b) an
optimum distribution of population between rural and urban settlements,
and among towns and cities of various sizes, (c) distribution of economic
activities in small and medium-sized growth centres, (d) dispersal of
economic activities through the establishment of counter-magnets in the
region, and (e) provision of minimum levels of services in urban and rural
areas.
The other major development programmes include (i) Urban Basic Services
for the Poor (UBSP) programme, (ii) the Environmental Improvement of
Urban Slums (EIUS) programme, (iii) the Integrated Development of Small
and Medium Towns (IDSMT), (iv) various housing and infrastructure
financing schemes of Housing and Urban Development Corporation

(HUDCO), (v) the Mega Cities Project, and (vi) the Integrated Urban
Poverty Eradication Programme (IUPEP).
Almost all the major programmes of urban development suffer from the
chronic disease of resource crunch. Right from the beginning of the
planning period, urban development has been low on the development
agenda with only 3-4 per cent of the total plan outlay being allocated to the
urban sector. The National Commission on Urbanization recommended in
1988 that at least 8 per cent of the Plan outlay should be dedicated to
urban sector.