8 I LK? L 5 5: (19) United States
8 I LK? L 5 5: (19) United States
Schuetzle et al.
(54)
Publication Classi?cation
(51)
Int Cl
'
FROM SYNGAS
(2006.01)
57
( )
ABSTRACT
COrreSpOndenCe AddreSSI
(73)
'
C10J 3/00
(52)
(75) Inventors:
Asslgnee?
11/966,788
Dec 28 2007
(22)
Flled'
(60)
10
64\
34
5
On-Line
Gas Recycle
<_______
M
Gas A na | yzer
4
16\ 20
Fuel Syngas \ I:
Generator
14
iL
On-Lrne
Gas
i
I
22\
26
Hydrogen
Generator
|___
.
Processor
Controller
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --|
(Computer)
:
l
i
i
Catalyst Reactorsi
32 \ l
l k?
L
J 30
14
y
:
62\
- - - - - - - --->
:
i
=7 V l =
Zer
28
'
5:
5:
241i 4
i
i
I
"V 'Tol
GrId
Facilities
25 3
US 2010/0175320 A1
6/2 mm3m
2%:6285
.UE_.
cmEPfB65
/mmmm
vm
65wm iwR65 .0
w?
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
[0009]
[0013]
(Methanation)
(Alkanes/Paraf?ns)
nCO+2nH2>C,,H2,,+nH2O
nCO+2nH2>C,,H2n+1OH+(n1)H2O
(Alkenes/Ole?ns)
(Alkanols/Alcohols)
(Water-Gas Shift)
conversion of fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, oil, oil shale, etc)
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
prised primarily of CO, H2, CO2 and CH4, is derived from any
carbonaceous feedstock material such as agricultural, forest
and municipal Waste as Well as natural gas, coal, oil shale and
[0016]
[0025]
may also be used to run the process and it may also be used as
a clean energy source for the syngas production systems.
[0026]
clean syngas stream (primarily CO, H2, CH4, CO2 and H20 at
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
[0035]
purposes only:
[0036]
[0038]
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
these technologies.
[0044] Currently, there are three types of gasi?ers: ?uidized
bed types, ?xed bed types and entrained ?oW types. In the
typical gasi?cation process, the fuel 18 is heated to a very
high temperature in the range of 10000 C. to 15000 C., While
under pressure (20 bars to 85 bars). Controlled amounts of
steam and oxygen are introduced to produce tWo sets of
catalyst dependent.
[0054] The syngas stream 20 is compressed by a compres
sor 26 to approximately the desired reaction pressure that is in
the catalyst reactors 28. The combined feed syngas should be
mally preferred.
[0049]
US 2010/0175320 A1
[0056]
Jul. 15,2010
[0067]
that are not catalytically reactive including CO2 and CH4 and
other gaseous hydrocarbons. These gases may help increase
and tube reactor, the gas ?oWs through tubes that contain the
catalyst that are surrounded by boiling Water, all contained
[0070]
[0059]
is particularly preferred.
[0071]
the gas.
genated gas from the ?rst catalyst then reacts With a second
[0060]
[0072]
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
[0074]
uct and un-reacted gases are split into tWo gas streams, the
recycle gas 32 and purge gas 42. The recycle gas 32 is mixed
for the process heat and chilling requirements for the system
[0081]
[0076]
[0078]
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
and diesel fuels. The input gas 30, containing primarily CO,
H2, CO2 and CH4, is partially converted to the products and
EXAMPLE 1
ture With chilled Water from chiller 60. These liquids 40 are
ide (m/e: 28) and oxygen has the same nominal mass as
Were very loW and therefore these species Will not interfere
With the carbon monoxide and methanol measurements using
the on-line mass spectrometer. Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the
results for the process optimization of syngas to alcohol con
[0090]
propanol.
[0096] After 60 minutes of data collection, changes in cata
lyst process conditions, the computer model determines that
the space velocity should be decreased from 9000 hrl to
5500 hr-1 and the catalyst reactor temperature increased to
5000 F. This change results in a slight decrease in the CO
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
%).
[0097] After another 90 minutes of process changes in cata
lyst conditions, the computer model determines that the maxi
mum CO conversion ef?ciency and ethanol/methanol selec
[0103]
plant is shoWn for three different recycle rates (0%, 75%, and
90%) to demonstrate the range of operating conditions and
sition ofthe syngas is 38% H2, 23% CO, 23% CO2 and 15%
CH4. For comparative purposes, it is estimated that this syn
gas could be generated from pyrolysis/ steam reforming of 10
tons per hour of 8500 BTU/lb Wood Waste, or pyrolysis/ steam
reforming of 9 tons per hour of 9500 BTU/lb of sub-bitumi
product mixes.
[0105] The productivity and ef?ciency for the production
EXAMPLE 4
EXAMPLE 2
for this system With a syngas input of 500,000 SCF per hour.
The productivity of this system is shoWn for three different
recycle rates to demonstrate the range of product mixes.
[0107] It can be seen in this example that because of the
high conversion rate of CO over the catalyst, feWer recycle
loops are needed to produce an ideal production level of fuel.
The combined thermal ef?ciency of 47% for the integrated
process results in greater product yields and concurrent eco
nomic bene?ts than the current best available technologies.
These three examples demonstrate clear commercial bene?ts
Production of Methanol
become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope
for three different recycle rates (0%, 75%, and 90%) to dem
onstrate the range of operating conditions and product mixes.
[0102]
US 2010/0175320 A1
TABLE 1
Gas Composition (Mole %)
Gas-Phase
Species
MW
Hydrogen
Methane
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitrogen
Ethane
Methanol
Oxygen
Carbon
Dioxide
Ethanol
Propanol
Benzene
Toluene
Total
FPSl
FPS
FPS
Operation
Operation
Operation
(Initial Conditions)
(60 min)
( 150 min)
SI*
BC**
AC***
BC**
AC***
BC**
AC**
2
16
28
35
18
28
44
15
26
31
15
18
42
18
24
29
19
17
41
18
25
27
19
16
28
30
32
32
44
0.4
0.01
0.00
0.05
18
0.4
0.01
0.00
0.05
15
0.4
0.01
10.7
0.00
16
0.5
0.01
0.00
0.00
16
0.5
0.01
9.2
0.00
16
0.5
0.01
0.00
0.00
16
0.05
0.01
7.5
0.00
17
46
60
78
92
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
7.5
0.3
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
9.7
0.6
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
12.2
0.8
0.03
0.00
99.50
100.50
98.9
100.5
101.0
101.5
99.6
lFPS Operation (Initial Conditions) Temperature: 450 F.; Space Velocity: 9000 hrl; Pressure: 750 psi
2FPS Operation (60 min) Temperature: 500 F.; Space Velocity: 5500 hrl; Pressure: 750 psi
3FPS Operation (150 min) Temperature: 575 F.; Space Velocity: 4000 hrl; Pressure: 650 psi
TABLE 2
TABLE 3-c0ntinued
op?mtion
FPS
FPS
(Initial
Operation
Operation
Conditions)
(60 min)
(150 min)
30.8
29.2
36.0
Parameter/Product
Optimized
Ei?ciency (%)
CO Conversion
'
'd
Liqui Fue On y
24
37
33
41
48
Ei?ciency (%)
Ethanol (Wgt. %)
48.9
57.5
66.1
Methanol (Wgt. %)
48.5
37.9
28.3
2.6
4.6
5.6
Propanol (Wgt- %)
TABLE 4
_
Operating Conditions:
Synthesis Catalyst
Pressure (psi)
TABLE 3
Example 2: Production of Methanol and Electricity
Temperature (0 F.)
CO Conv?rsion (%)
30
Promoted CuiZn
700
Temperature (0 F.)
510
CO Conversion (%)
15
Mixed Alcohols*
74
CH4
CO2
20
5
Plant Productivity:
95
Mixed Alcohols
CH4
(gal/hr)
CO2
75
90
260
548
703
9.6
6.0
4.1
Ei?ciency (%)
Plant Productivity:
Recycle Rate (%)
Methanol (gal/hr)
Net Electricity
0
230
12_1
75
632
8_6
90
975
5_6
13
27
37
32
39
45
US 2010/0175320 A1
Jul. 15,2010
10
controlling temperature, pressure, space velocity, chemical
composition and recycle rates of said pre- and post cata
TABLE 5
Operating Conditions:
Synthesis Catalyst
Pressure (psi)
Temperature (0 F.)
450
CO Conversion (%)
80
Selectivity (mol %
C :
Liquid Hydrocar-
82
5
12
bons*
CH4
CO2
steam; and
0
435
75
511
90
530
(gal/hr)
Net Electricity (MW)
4.6
3.1
2.7
Efficiency (%)
Liquid Fuel
34
40
43
46
41
47
*Product distribution is 85% C5+ hydrocarbons, 60-80% ole?nic, at 140,000 BTU/gal, well
suited for high quality low-sulfur diesel fuel
composition;
reacting the supplemented synthesis gas stream with cata
lysts selected to convert carbon monoxide and hydrogen
to reaction products to produce a stream of reaction
stock;
convert carbon monoxide and hydrogen to reaction
products to produce a stream of reaction products and
chamber.
12. A process as recited in claim 11, further comprising:
US 2010/0175320 A1
prising:
means for heating gasses Within said reaction Vessel.
15. A catalytic reactor as recited in claim 13, further com
Jul. 15,2010
prising: