ESS Topic 5.2 - Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
ESS Topic 5.2 - Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
The Trent Biotic Index was first published by Woodiwiss (1964) who was employed
by the Trent River Authority (England)....Hand samples and kick samples taken with
a hand net (780 micron mesh) are taken in such a way as to include material from
all microhabitats. He devised a scheme in which the number of groups of defined
benthic [on the bottom under a body of water] taxa was related to the presence of
six key organisms found in the fauna. These organisms were plecopteran larvae,
ephemeropteran larvae, trichopteran larvae, Gammarus, Asellus and tubificids plus
red chironomid larvae. In practice, organisms are sorted into groups and streams
are classified (10 for clean water to 0 for grossly polluted) according to the presence
or absence of key groups and the diversity of fauna. This index like the saprobic
system does not take into account the relative abundance of the organisms present.
Balloch et al. (1976) reviewed the Trent Index and listed a number of advantages
and disadvantages associated with its use. Most notable advantages mentioned
were ease of use and its ability to correctly classify moderate to grossly polluted
waters. In general Balloch et al. were very critical of this index and indicated that it
was not suitable for use as a criterion of water quality because of its general
insensitivity to varying levels of impact, especially mildly and moderately polluted
waters. When compared to the Chandler scores (CBS and ACBS noted below) the
Trent index proved of little value in determining intermediate levels of pollution in
rivers known to have a well defined spatial pattern from clean to grossly polluted
conditions (Murphy 1978). Both Murphy (1978) and Balloch et al. (1976) also
suggested that the Trent Biotic Index was affected by habitat quality making
interpretation of the index difficult. Overall, the Trent Index appears to lack the
sensitivity desired by most workers interested in assessing the degree of biological
impairment associated with various levels of water quality. (Source:
http://www.cpcb.ku.edu/datalibrary/assets/library/KBSreports/KBSRept35b.pdf )
In summary:
the Trent Biotic Index uses the presence or absence of 6 key organisms
(plecopteran larvae, ephemeropteran larvae, trichopteran larvae, Gammarus,
Asellus and tubificids plus red chironomid larvae) to indicate the relative level of
pollution in a stream.
Advantage: Easy to use, especially for moderately or heavily polluted sites.
Disadvantages: not specific enough, doesnt fully account for habitat quality
We can also use abiotic factors that change as a result of the pollutant to indirectly
test the pollution levels such as dissolved oxygen (DO) or BOD levels of the water (IB
ESS Course Companion p.278).
Indicator species are those species that are present either only in polluted areas or
only in unpolluted areas. Refer to p. 280 of the Course Companion. For example
freshwater shrimp
freshwater mussels
stonefly nymphs
caddisfly larvae
rat-tailed maggot and sludge worms in polluted water
peppered moth wing color (predominantly black indicates high levels of soot
and particulate matter in the air; predominantly light grey indicates relatively
particulate-free air)
Gammarus - small crustaceans that are sensitive to different salinity levels