Physics Investiga Tory Project: Primary Unit of Elementary Particles
Physics Investiga Tory Project: Primary Unit of Elementary Particles
Physics
201
Investigatory Project
5-
16
Primary Unit
Quark’s
of Elementary
particles.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
HISTORY:-
The quark model was proposed by
physicistsMurray Gell-Mann and George
Zweig in 1964. At the time of the Quark theory’s
inception, the “particle zoo” included, amongst
other particles, a multitude of Hadrons. Gell-
Mann and Zweig posited that they were not
elementary particles, but were instead composed
of combinations of quarks and antiquarks. Their
model invoked three flavors of quarks, up, down,
and strange, to which they ascribed properties
such as spin and electric charge. There was
particular contention about whether the quark was
a physical entity or a mere abstraction used to
explain concepts that were not fully understood at
the time.
In less than a year, extensions to the Gell-Mann-
Zweig model were proposed. Sheldon Lee Glashow
and James Bjorken predicted the existence of
fourth flavor of quark, which they called Charm.
The addition was proposed because it allowed for a
better description of the weak interaction (the
mechanism that allows quarks to decay),
equalized the number of known quarks with the
number of known leptons, and implied a mass
formula that correctly reproduced the masses of
the known mesons.
In 1968, deep inelastic scattering experiments at
the Stanford Linear Accelerator center (SLAC)
showed that the proton contained much smaller,
point-like objects and was therefore not an
elementary particle. Physicists were reluctant to
firmly identify these objects with quarks at the
time, instead calling them “partons”-a term given
by Richard Feynman. The objects were later
identified as up and down quarks as the other
flavors were discovered. Nevertheless,”parton”
remains in use as a collective term for the
constituents of hadrons (quarks, antiquarks, and
gluons).
The strange quark’s existence was indirectly
validated by SLAC’s scattering experiments: not
only necessary component of Gell-Mann and
Zweig’s three-quark model, but it provided an
explanation for the kaon (K) and pion (π) hadrons
discovered in cosmic rays in 1947.
In 1970 paper, Glashow, John Iliopouos and Luciano
Maiani presented the so called GIM mechanism to
explain the experimental non-observation of flavor-
changing neutral currents. This theoretical model
required the existence of the as-yet undiscovered
charm quark.
Charm quarks were produced almost
simultaneously by two teams in November 1974.
One at SLAC under Burton Richter, and one at
Brookhaven National Laboratory under
Samuel Ting. The charm quarks were observed
bound with charm antiquarks in mesons. The two
parties had assigned the discovered meson two
different symbols, J and ; thus, it became formally
known as the J/ meson.
In following years a number of suggestions
appeared for extending the quark model to six
quarks. Of these, in 1975 paper by Haim Harari
was the first to coin the terms top and bottom for
the additional quarks.
In 1977, the bottom quark was observed by a
team at Fermilab led by Leon Lederman. This was
a strong indicator of the top quark’s existence. It
was in 1995 that top quark was finally observed,
also by the CDF and D teams at Fermilab.
It had a mass much larger than had been
previously expected, almost as larger as that of a
Gold Atom.
Etymology:-
For some time, Gell-Mann was undecided on an
actual spelling for the term he intended to coin,
until he found the word QUARK in James Joyce’s
book Finnegans Wake:-
Three QUARKS for muster Mark!
Gell-Mann went into further detail regarding the
name quark in his book The Quark and the
Jaguar.
In 1963 he assigned the name Quark to the
fundamental constituent of Nucleon.
Zweig preferred the name ace for the particle he
had theorized, but Gell-Mann’s terminology came
to prominence once the quark model had been
commonly accepted.
The quark flavors were given their names for
several reasons. The up and down quarks are
named after the up and down components of
isospin, which they carry. Strange quarks were
given their names because they were discovered
to be components of the strange particles
discovered in cosmic rays years before the quark
model was proposed; these particles were deemed
“strange” because they had unusually long
lifetimes. Glashow, who co-proposed Charm quark
with Bjorken, is quoted as saying,” We called our
construct the ‘charmed quark’, for we were
fascinated and pleased by the symmetry it brought
to the Sub-nuclear world”. The names “bottom”
and “top”, coined by Harari, were chosen because
they are “logical partners for up and down quarks”.
In the past, bottom and top quarks were
sometimes referred to as “beauty” and “truth”
respectively. Therefore accelerator complexes
devoted to massive production of bottom quarks
are sometimes called “beauty factories”.
Properties
Electric charge
Quarks have fractional electric charge values –
either 1⁄3 or 2⁄3 times the elementary charge (e),
depending on flavor. Up, charm, and top quarks
(collectively referred to as up-type quarks) have a
charge of +2⁄3 e, while down, strange, and bottom
quarks (down-type quarks) have −1⁄3 e. Antiquarks
have the opposite charge to their corresponding
quarks; up-type antiquarks have charges of −2⁄3 e
and down-type antiquarks have charges of +1⁄3 e.
Since the electric charge of a hadron is the sum of
the charges of the constituent quarks, all hadrons
have integer charges: the combination of three
quarks (baryons), three antiquarks (antibaryons),
or a quark and an antiquark (mesons) always
results in integer charges.[52] For example, the
hadron constituents of atomic nuclei, neutrons and
protons, have charges of 0 e and +1 e
respectively; the neutron is composed of two down
quarks and one up quark, and the proton of two up
quarks and one down quark.[12]
Spin
Spin is an intrinsic property of elementary
particles, and its direction is an important degree
of freedom. It is sometimes visualized as the
rotation of an object around its own axis (hence the
name "spin"), though this notion is somewhat
misguided at subatomic scales because
elementary particles are believed to be point-like.
[53]