Chapter 10: The Lego Group: Building Strategy Case 10: The Lego Group: Building Strategy
Chapter 10: The Lego Group: Building Strategy Case 10: The Lego Group: Building Strategy
I. Problem Defined
What marketing strategy would Lego create to become the third-largest
toy manufacturer and overcome competitors without having additional costs
and decreasing sales? This is the main problem of Lego that resulted from:
>increased control over licensing agreements
>loss of trademark protection; and
>competition from new and existing companies
With Lego as the fourth-largest toy manufacturer in the world, different
threats emerged and tested their stand on the industry. How will the
management of Lego handle this?
II. Analysis and Recording of Current Situation
LEGO is privately controlled by Kirk Kristiansens family, it is the fourthlargest toy manufacturer in the world and named as the Toy of the Century. The
company is known for its product lines, Lego Star Wars. Lego City and Lego
Duplo with 9000 employees that sells seven sets each second. They also design
video games, board games and a theme park. Lego has its website available for
online purchase and developed a virtual online LEGO Universe. The company
produces 2 million bricks per hour and developed 2400 different shapes of bricks
in 53 kinds of colors.
Legos management is currently focusing on developing their business
despite the problems that the company encounters in the industry.
Phase I: Environment
The global toy sales represented over $83.3 billion and is one of the fastestgrowing categories was the building sets. Different toy companies were entering
the toy market. They diversified their product line by different themes featuring
movie characters. Major competitors of Lego was the top two largest toy
manufacturers in the world namely Mattel and Hasbro, respectively.
compatible with the Lego brick design. These competitors bricks could be fitted
together and be built with Lego bricks. TYCO and MEGA Bloks also created a
brick design which was almost identical to that of Lego bricks. TYCO provided
slogans such as If you cant tell the difference, why pay the difference that
resulted to a lawsuit that lasted four years.
The barriers of the competition lowered when Lego plastic brick design
patent expired. Mega Bloks was the largest competition to Lego. Mega Bloks
created products that often made consumers misled, this resulted to an 11-year
court battle. New competitors were planning to launch a new building block that
would be compatible also with Lego bricks
Threat of new entrants
Since the Lego plastic brick design patent expired, the barriers of competition
were lowered in the building toy market and it became an opportunity for other
companies to enter the market. Other than the existing huge competitors of Lego,
it was not difficult for new entrants especially with the loss of trademark
protection. New companies became more aggressive because they could easily
counterfeit the products of Lego.
Threat of substitute product
Competitors created products that were almost similar to Lego bricks.
Slogans were created like TYCOs If you cant tell the difference, why pay the
difference. Substitute products often misled consumers into purchasing other
companys products that they thought were Legos, considering that they had the
identical designs.
with Disney than Lego has. Another problem came from Mega Bloks that created
bricks similar to Lego products that often misled consumers. Lego lost its
trademark protection when they lost to the court battle that stated shapes were
not the basis for a trademark. This resulted to a major loss for Lego and became
an opportunity for competitors and new entrants.
Since competitors were focusing on the exact products that Lego is
producing, the company needs to create a unique marketing strategy that would
attract consumers. Something that other companies could not easily copy. Lego
is facing problems of risking its position in the industry if they somehow fail to
innovate and overcome their aggressive competitors.
IV. Formulate/ evaluate/ record alternative courses of action
If tangible products of Lego bricks can be imitated by other companies, Lego
should create marketing strategies that could attract consumers other than their
offer of the toy itself.
A. A unique toy set is designed by consumers and will have their own story
line. Two activities will be involved, one for the creators of the design, and an
opportunity for consumers with abilities to create stories. Customers can create
designs on the website which everyone can view and every two months, five
products would be featured on their site, those products that were preferred by
the consumers themselves. These five products will be the basis of the stories
that would be made by the consumers, stories that they will create originally.
They will be given one month to submit their entries. After a month, winners of
the designs and the stories will be awarded by the same Lego set that has been
created and would be listed on Legos hall of fame consumers. The existence of
the software Lego Digital Designer can be used for this strategy.
Pros:
> The Lego Website will be visited more often.
> No age requirement would be needed. Open for all ages.
> Competitors will have a hard time copying this activity.
> This will not be costly compared to what the company experienced
before.
Cons:
> There would be not much personal communication since it focuses on
the website.
> It would be timely for the management going through entries.
B. A Lego Card can be created for consumers. This will be used for every
purchase of a customer of any Lego product. One transaction will give a Lego
Card one point and one piece of a unique and limited edition set of Lego
products. For every purchase they will be receiving pieces of the set which they
will be collecting until they completed the number of transactions and points to
needed to acquire. After they have gained the required points, their last piece will
be given upon their last transaction together with the copy of the actual image of
the set. These Lego sets that would be given for Lego Card customers will be
exclusive for them and no same product sets will be sold in the market. .
Consumer can visit their account on the website and can check every
missing piece that they received until the whole picture of the product be
revealed.
Pros:
> Competitors would not be able to copy this Lego set since the actual image
of the product will be given at the end of every transaction and designs will be
changed every quarter of the year.
> This will not be costly and would generate profit resulting from consumers
curiosity.
> The Lego website would be more active.
Cons:
> Lego will be giving a lot of time in creating unique products every quarter.
Innovation and creativity must be present.
C. Lego can focus on product distribution and establish more stores in different
countries where target market exists.
Pros:
> Product awareness will be more available to consumers.
Cons:
> This will require a big investment and cost for store establishments.
> Research will be costly.