0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K viewsButler 1
Hinds County, MS
Uploaded by
the kingfishCopyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K viewsButler 1
Hinds County, MS
Uploaded by
the kingfishCopyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
/ 8
360 MAY 08 ants
MINUTES CIRCUIT GOURT, 1ST DISTRICT, HINDS CouNTy —______ MAY tents, $05
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
vs. FIL ED Cause Number: 12-0-831
CHRISTOPHER BUTLER MAY 08 2015
ganaana UMN CRCUTCERE
ORDER DEKaING MOTION TORNOLLE PROSEQUI
‘THIS COURT, having heard and considered defense counsel's ore temus Motion for
Nolte Prosequi, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the
motion is not well-taken and should be DENJED, based on the following:
This matter was set for a plea hearing on Jemuary 7, 2015, and in advance of that docket,
the District Attomey presented the Court with an Order of Nolle Prosequi. See “Exhibit A,"
attached, No motion was presented with the proposed order in violation of Rule 6.07 of the
Uniform Circuit and County Court Rules." A hearing was held on January 22, 2015, at the
conelasion of which the undersigned instructed the parties to submit a detailed, written Motion
for Nolle Prosequi for his consideration along with documentation supposting the propriety of
the order, within ten (10) days. The motion and supporting information was due to the Court no
later than Monday, February 2, 2015 and as of the date of this Order, no such information has
deen submitted? As the movant failed to comply with the order of this Court and URCCC 6.07,
the Court find that the matter is not well-taken and should be DENIED.
" URCCC 6.07 states that “[alp apalication tothe cour for an order shall be by motion, which, unless made during a
bearing or trial, shal be made in writing, shall state with porticulrity the ground therefor, and shall set forth the
feliet oF order Sought. The requirement of writing is fulfilled she motion is stated in a writen notice ofthe hearing
of the motion or ifthe matter is presented in an agreed order,
® Subsequent to the hearing, the District Avorney requested a tranccript of fanuery 22, 2615 hearing. ‘The court
reporter prepared this transcript end such was submitted with an invoice to te District Aamney’s Office by the end
cof February, 2015. As of the date of this order, movant of the Motion for Nolle Prasequi, the Distict Attorney, has
‘een in possession ofthe transcript in excess of twa (2) months,
1 361
MAY 08 2015
MINUTES CIRCUIT COURT, 1ST DISTAICT. HINDS COUNTY ___jgyy_ TERM, Pe
IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the ove tenus
Morton for Nolle Prosequi, be and the same hereby is DENIED. This matter is hereby re-set for
trial on July 13, 2015.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 7 ay ffAT 205 CIRCUIT COURT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKET CIRCRO4-596
CASE NO: 120452 FILED: 4/11/12 CASE TYPE: INDICTMENT
STYLE: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
VS BUTLER CHRISTOPHER LINE NO: MI!
LINE DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION ROOK PAGE
46 1-20-16 ORDER CLARTFYING AND REMOVING SEAL 0796-239
- FOR LIMITED PURPOSE,
END OF FILE CIRCUIT COURT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKET
CASE NO: 120831 FILED: 7/18/12
STYLE: STATE OF MISSTSSTPPT
VS BUTLER CHRISTOPHER
LINE DATE EVENT
25 12-30-15 ORDER
26 1-04-16 misc
27 1-04-16 JURY INSTRUCTIONS
28 1-04-16 MOTION
29 1-04-16 MOTION
30 1-21-16 MorIoN
31 1-26-15 RESPONSE
32 2-09-16 ORDER
END OF FILE
CRSE TYPE: INDICTMENT
LINE NO:
DESCRIPTION
SETTING TRIAL AND MOTIONS
DEADLINE
WITNESS LIST OF CHRISTOPHER
BULTER
DEET
TO SUPPRESS
IN LIMINE (1)
TO REVOKE BOND (SH)
TQ NOTION TO REVOKE
ENTER BY NG
CONTINUANCE,
CIRCRO4-596
XMIT:
BOOK PAGE
0795-703
0796-635 CERCUIT COURT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKET
CASE NOs 120831 FILED: 7/18/12
STYLE: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
VS BUTLER CHRISTOPHER
LINE DATE EVENT
12 6-28-13 EMAILED
13° 8-14-13 CONTINUED
14 8-14-13 EMAILED
15 12-10-13 ORDER
16 12-20-13 ORDER
17 4-15-14 ORDER
18 6-13-14 ORDER
19 3-16-14 ORDER
20 9-30-14 ORDER
21 5-08-15 ORDER
22 7-23-15 ORDER
23 10-08-15 ORDER
24 12-08-15 ORDER
CASE TYPE: INDICTMENT
LINE NO:
DESCRIPTION
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
TO ATTYS OF RECORD ON 7-8-13
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
TO ATTYS OF RECORD ON @-21-13
OF CONTINUANCE
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
AGREED ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
RESCHEDULING TRIAL
LU/10/14 TO 11/17/14
DENYING MOTION FOR NOLLE
PROSEQUI
CONTINUANCE ORDER
CONTINUANCE
CONTINUANCE
FS=SCROLL BACK - F4=END OF DOCKET - F1=MENU
CIRCRO4-596
XMIT
BOOK PAGE
0763-481
0769-532
0770-303
0775-309
0777-569
0781-563
0782-191
0790-360
0792-271
0794-021
0795-335, CASE
CIRCUIT COURT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKET
NO: 120831 FILED: 7/18/12 CASE TYPE: INDICTMENT
STYLE! STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
LINE
wane
se
VS BUTLER CHRISTOPHER LINE NO:
DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION
7-18-12 INDICTMENT PILED-CAP
8-09-12 CAPIAS EX AND IN CUSTODY
§-15-12 APPEARANCE BOND
§-31-12 WAIVER OF ARRAIGNMEN
3-14-13 EMAILED ORDER REASSIGNING CASE SENT TO
-— ATTYS ON REC
3-14-13 REASSIGN TO JUDGE WEILL
4-12-13 MOTION FOR HEARING & DISMISSAL OF
- - INDICTMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION
- 99-15-53 BUT SUBJECT TO PRO-
~~ DUCTION CERTAIN EVIDENCE TO
4-12-13 MOTION (CONT FROM LINE 7) THE HINDS
- COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
4-19-13 ORDER TRIAL @-5-13
4-18-13 EMAILED ORDER SETTING TRIAL SENT TO
- + ATYS ON REC ON 4/22
6-28-13 CONTINUED
FS
