Int J Thermophys (2011) 32,1966-1972
Int J Thermophys (2011) 32,1966-1972
CITATION
READS
31
4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Sanclayton Moreira
Universidade Federal da Par
29 PUBLICATIONS 175 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Received: 17 June 2010 / Accepted: 25 July 2011 / Published online: 6 August 2011
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract The effect of dissolving -carotene into palm olein was experimentally
investigated using time-resolved thermal lens spectroscopy. The thermal diffusivity of
palm olein was measured, and the dependence on the concentration of the compounds
was studied. The results show an enhancement in the thermal diffusivity by increasing
the quantity of -carotene in the compounds. This behavior was interpreted on the
basis of the electronic structure of the -carotene molecule.
Keywords
1 Introduction
Time-resolved thermal lens (TL) spectroscopy is a high-sensitivity and nondestructive optical technique used to study samples with very small optical absorption, by
measuring the thermal properties of the materials. In recent years, the TL technique
has been used to measure optical and thermal properties of transparent samples with
an enhanced accuracy, for solid samples, liquids, as well as other complex systems
[15]. In the TL experiments, the sample is exposed to an excitation laser beam with
a TEM00 Gaussian intensity profile. A fraction of the absorbed energy is converted
into heat, generating a radial temperature profile. As a result of this local temperature
increase, a lens-like optical element in the heated region is created. The presence of
123
1967
(1)
where
m=
p
e
Z1
Pe Ae L
,V =
, =
Zc
p k
n
T
.
p
In Eq. 1, I (t) is the temporal dependence of the probe laser beam intensity at the
detector, I (0) is the initial value of I (t), is the thermally induced phase shift of
the beam after it passes through the sample, Z c is the confocal distance of the probe
beam, and Z 1 is the distance of the probe beam waist from the sample; p is the probe
123
1968
beam waist, e is the minimum excitation beam waist at the sample position, p is
the probe beam wavelength, Pe is the power of the excitation laser, k is the thermal
conductivity, (n/ T )p is the temperature coefficient of the refractive index at the
probe beam wavelength, Ae is the optical absorption coefficient at the excitation beam
wavelength, and L is the sample thickness. Finally, is the characteristic TL time
constant defined as
=
e2
4D
(2)
123
1969
0.9
0.04
0.8
e = 532 nm
Absorbance, a.u.
0.7
0.6
(e)
0.5
(d)
0.4
(c)
530
532
534
536
538
540
0.3
(b)
0.2
(a)
0.1
0.0
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Wavelength, nm
Fig. 1 Absorption spectra for: (a) palm olein, (b) PO + BC; concentration of BC, 5.96 106 mol L1 ,
(c) PO + BC, 1.49 105 mol L1 , (d) PO + BC, 2.23 105 mol L1 , and (e) PO + BC, 3.35
105 mol L1
Table 1 Thermal diffusivities
of oleic acid (OA) and olive oil
(OO) compared with literature
values
Samples (ms)
OA
10.2
10.3
OO
8.7
8.8
absorption of -carotene has been reported between 425 nm and 490 nm, depending
on the type of solvent used [18,19]. The influence of -carotene on the compound
is evident from the figure. The inset in the figure shows the low absorption of the
compounds around the wavelength of the excitation laser in the experiment. One can
see that there is a very small enhancement in the absorption near 532 nm.
To check the reliability of the experimental setup, measurements of the thermal
diffusivity of oleic acid (OA) and pure olive oil (OO) were performed. The results are
reported in Table 1 and compared with values previously reported. One can see that the
thermal diffusivities measured in this work are in very good agreement with literature
values. It is important to note the values of < 0.3 in Table 1, a necessary condition for the application of the approximate theoretical model for mode-mismatched
dual-beam TL spectroscopy [16].
The TL signal from palm olein (PO) at room temperature is shown in Fig. 2. The
signal decreases in time indicating that the thermal lens defocuses the probe beam
on the detector, and the sample behaves like a divergent lens. The symbols represent the experimental data, and the solid line is the result of the best fit by Eq. 1
with m = 3.91 and V = 1.73 given by the experimental measurements of the beam
123
1970
= 0.23 rad
0.98
= 8.9 0.1 ms
TL signal, a.u.
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.84
0.82
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Time, ms
Fig. 2 Thermal lens signal for palm olein
12.8
D, 10 cm s
-1
12.6
-4
12.4
12.2
12.0
11.8
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
-5
-1
3.0
3.5
Concentration, 10 molL
waist, and and as adjustable parameters. The values for these parameters were
= 0.23 rad and = 8.9 ms. Using Eq. 2 with e = 65 m, a thermal diffusivity
D = 11.9 104 cm2 s1 for PO was obtained.
The same procedure was repeated to measure the thermal diffusivities of the compounds PO + BC, and the results are summarized in Table 2. The experimental values
for the parameter < 0.3 are emphasized. The thermal diffusivities measured in
this work have the same order of magnitude as many other vegetable oils previously
measured [7,8,17]. Figure 3 shows the thermal diffusivities as a function of the concentration of -carotene in the solution with palm olein. The solid line is an exponential
123
1971
Table 2 Thermal lens parameters and thermal diffusivities for palm olein (PO) and compounds PO + BC
Concentration (mol L1 )
(ms)
D (104 cm2 s1 )
0.0a
8.9 0.1
0.23
11.9
0.59 105
8.9 0.1
0.17
11.9
1.49 105
8.8 0.1
0.23
12.0
2.23 105
8.7 0.1
0.20
12.1
3.35 105
8.2 0.1
0.26
12.9
a PO
function fitting the experimental points. This fit was made using least squares with
2 minimization. Some important features can be observed in the figure: firstly, the
curve fits very well the value of the thermal diffusivity of the pure palm olein when
no -carotene was dissolved, in total agreement with the value found through Fig. 2.
Another feature is that the exponential function has the form,
D(c) = D(0)ec/
(3)
123
1972
samples was increased. This behavior can be attributed to the number of delocalized
-electrons in the principal chain of the -carotene molecules that could be excited
by the laser excitation at 532 nm without strong absorption, but should be responsible
to transfer energy to the other molecular species in their neighborhood. Nonradiative decay of these excited molecules will be responsible for the enhancement in the
temperature and, consequently, for the increase of the thermal diffusivity.
Acknowledgments The authors thank Agropalma (PA, Brazil) for supplying palm olein. A.J.F.C. thanks
the CAPES Agency for a grant for this work. The financial support from CAPES (Proequip 1074/2007),
CNPq, and FAPESPA (Projeto 112/08) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. A.A. Andrade, E. Tenorio, T. Catunda, M.L. Baesso, A. Cassanho, H.P. Jenssen, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
16, 395 (1999)
2. M.L. Baesso, A.C. Bento, A.A. Andrade, J.A. Sampaio, E. Pecorato, L.A.O. Nunes, T. Catunda,
S. Gama, Phys. Rev. B 57, 10545 (1998)
3. S.M. Brown, M.L. Baesso, J. Shen, R.D. Snook, Anal. Chim. Acta 282, 711 (1993)
4. A.C. Bento, A.J. Palangana, L.R. Evangelista, M.L. Baesso, J.R.D. Pereira, E.C. da Silva, A.M.
Mansanares, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3371 (1996)
5. J.R.D. Pereira, A.M. Mansanares, A.J. Palangana, M.L. Baesso, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Crys. A 332,
3079 (1999)
6. C.V. Bindhu, S.S. Harilal, V.P.N. Nampoori, C.P.G. Vallabhan, Opt. Eng. 37, 2791 (1998)
7. R. Carbajal Valdez, J.L. Jimnez Prez, A. Cruz-Orea, E. San Martn-Martnez, Int. J. Thermophys. 27, 1890 (2006)
8. M.P.P. Castro, A.A. Andrade, R.W.A. Franco, P.C.M.L. Miranda, M. Sthel, H. Vargas, R. Constantino,
M.L. Baesso, Chem. Phys. Lett. 411, 18 (2005)
9. K.G. Berger, The Use of Palm Oil in Frying MPOPC, Malaysia (2005)
10. D. Narang, S. Sood, M.K. Thomas, A.K. Dinda, S.K. Maulik, BMC Pharmacol. 4, 29 (2004)
11. W. Liu, Z. Zheng, R. Zu, Z. Liu, Z. Xu, H. Yu, W. Wu, A. Li, Y. Yang, W. Su, J. Phys. Chem. A
111, 10044 (2007)
12. H. Frank, J. Bautistta, J. Josue, Z. Pendon, R. Hiller, F. Sharples, D. Gosztola, M. Wasiliewski, J.
Phys. Chem. B 104, 4569 (2000)
13. A. Macpherson, T. Gillbro, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 5049 (1998)
14. A. Garcia-Martin, A. Pazur, B. Wilhelm, M. Silber, B. Robert, P. Braun, J. Mol. Biol. 382, 154 (2008)
15. J. Shen, R.D. Lowe, R.D. Snook, Chem. Phys. 165, 385 (1992)
16. J. Shen, A.J. Soroka, R.D. Snook, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 700 (1995)
17. J. Bernal-Alvarado, A.M. Mansanares, E.C. da Silva, S.G.C. Moreira, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 697 (2003)
18. N. Tschirner, M. Schenderlein, K. Brose, E. Schlodder, M.A. Mroginski, P. Hildebrandt, C. Thomsen, Phys Status Solidi B 245, 2225 (2008). doi:10.1002/pssb.200879649
19. E.I. Finkelshtein, I.S. Krasnokutskaya, L.A. Vakulova, J. Mol. Struct. 480/481, 569 (1999)
20. D. Dadarlat, H. Vissee, D. Bicanict, Meas. Sci. Technol. 6, 1215 (1995)
21. D. Bicanic, M. Franko, J. Gibkes, E. Gerkema, J.P. Favier, H. Jalink, in Progress in Photothermal and
Photoacoustic Science and Technology, Life and Earth Sciences, vol. 3, ed. by A. Mandelis, P. Hess
(SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, 1997), p. 169
22. J.A. Balderas-Lopez, A. Mandelis, J.A. Garcia, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 2933 (2000)
23. S.M. Lima, E.S. Bannwart, R.G. Oliveira, L.H.C. Andrade, P.V. DelR, N. Jorge, F. Pedrochi,
R. Constantini, A.N. Medina, M.L. Baesso, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 153, 531 (2008)
123