Scribd
Upload
53 views

List of Files No. of DET: Internal Logical File

This document contains information about the logical files, external interfaces, inputs, outputs, and inquiries needed for a project. It includes lists of files with numbers of details. It then calculates unadjusted function points and adjusted function points. It provides information on estimating effort in person days using function points.

Uploaded by

Lee Kally
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views

List of Files No. of DET: Internal Logical File

This document contains information about the logical files, external interfaces, inputs, outputs, and inquiries needed for a project. It includes lists of files with numbers of details. It then calculates unadjusted function points and adjusted function points. It provides information on estimating effort in person days using function points.

Uploaded by

Lee Kally
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

INTERNAL LOGICAL F

LIST OF FILES

No. of DET

PO number
Changes made to PO need to be updated as
amendmens
Bill database
Collection money database
Total
(here I have assumed that it will require 2/3 ret files for storing)

19
4
4
4

EXTERNAL INTERFACE
LIST OF FILES

No. of DET

Purchase order details


All report Generation

5
4

Total
(Here location file is maintained by fixed assest system and hourly rate file is maintained by currency

EXTERNAL INPUT (E
LIST OF FILES
PO main Details
Item Details
PO amendments
Collections
Supplier Bill details

Total

No. of DET
7
6
5
6
5

EXTERNAL OUTPU
LIST OF FILES

No. of DET

Purchase order details


Report generation

5
6

Total

EXTERNAL INQUIRY(C

(input side is calculated a

FOR input Side


LIST OF FILES

No. of DET

Purchase order Inquiry


Bill Summary Inquiry
Site collection Inquiry

6
4
4

Total

For OUTPUT SIDE (CALCULATED AS EO)


LIST OF FILES

No. of DET

Purchase order Inquiry


Bill Summary Inquiry
Site collection Inquiry

Total

CALCULATED EQ (input side an output side)

5
4
4

Complexity

LIST OF FILES

Low

Purchase order Inquiry


Bill Summary Inquiry
Site collection Inquiry

1
1
1

Total

UNADJUSTED FUNCTION POI

Type Of Component

Complexity of Compo
Low

External Input(EI)
0
External Output(EO)
0
External Inquiries(EQ)
9
Internal Logical Files(ILF)
28
External Interface Files(EIF)
10
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNADJUSTED FUNCTION POINT

TOTAL UNADJUSTED FUNCTION POINT (UFP)


VALUE ADJUSTED FACTOR(VAF)

ADJUSTED FUNCTION POINT(AFP)

MAN DAYS EFFORT

Unadjusted Function Point count(UFP)


Processing Complexity Adjustment Factor

Adjusted function Point Count (AFP)


Calibration Factor (CF)
Total Function Point Measure (TFP)
Delivery Rate (DR) in FPs/person months
Days per person month (DPM)
High level effort estimate in person days

N1

N2

The Calibration Factor is used to take into


consideration the estimating assumptions that have
been made, and some allowance for growth,
recognizing that not all of the requirements may
have been discovered at this point in the life cycle.

The function point


delivery rates that can be
achieved on a project
depend heavily on the
technology and the
project environment.

Measurement studies of completed


projects have shown that typically less
than 50 percent of the eventual
requirements are identified early in the life As a broad rule of
cycle. For this reason, it is suggested that thumb, a delivery
you select an adjustment factor of between rate of around 10 to
two to three as a starting point (depending 15 function points
on the level of certainty about the
per person month
requirements). With a fully populated
appears to be in-line
metrics database, this factor can be
with general
calibrated more closely by counting a
industry experience
sample set of completed systems, using
for a
both the standard IFPUG rules and the
Mainframe/COBOL
high-level approach. Dividing the full
environment. An
count (generated using the IFPUG method) extensive treatment
by the high-level count (generated using
of U.S. averages for
this approach) produces the actual
software
Calibration Factor that would have been
productivity and
needed to be applied in each case. From quality is included in
this data, select a typical or average
Capers Jones' book,
Calibration Factor to use in the project
Applied Software
being estimated.
Measurement.

INTERNAL LOGICAL FILE


No. of RET

Complexity
Average

Low

High

1
1
1

1
1
1
4

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

EXTERNAL INTERFACE FILE


No. of RET

Complexity
Average

Low
3
2

High

1
1

0
0

0
0

e file is maintained by currency system)

EXTERNAL INPUT (EI)


No. of FTR

Complexity
Average

Low
3
3
3
3
3

High

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
1
1

EXTERNAL OUTPUT
No. of FTR

Complexity
Average

Low
4
2

High

0
0

1
1

0
0

EXTERNAL INQUIRY(Combination of input side annd output side)

ut side is calculated as EI and output side is calculated as EO)

No. of FTR

Complexity
Average

Low
1
2
2

No. of FTR

1
1
1

0
0
0

0
0
0

Complexity
Average

Low
2
1
2

High

High

1
1
1

0
0
0

0
0
0

Complexity
Average

High
0
0
0

0
0
0

STED FUNCTION POINT

Complexity of Component
Average
0
10
0
0
0

TOTAL

High
30
0
0
0
0

D FUNCTION POINT

30
10
9
28
10
87

FP%
34%
11%
10%
32%
11%
100%

87
0.93

57.3591

calculated using AFPs = UFPs * (0.65 + 0.01 * VAF)


80.91 =--ANS2

way 2
87
0.93 value of VAF

87
0.93

57.3591
2 N1
114.7182 calculated as (AFP*CF)
10 N2
21.5 N3
246.64413 calculated as (TFP/DR)+DPM

N3

Enter a conversion factor


to be used to convert
person-months of effort
to person-days of effort.
The default value is 21.5
days per month.

80.91
2
161.82
10
21.5
347.913

ILF COMPLEXITY

EIF COMPLEXITY

EI COMPLEXITY

EO COMPLEXITY

EI COMPLEXITY

VALUE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR

Sr no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Degree
of
General System Characteristics
Influence
Data Communications
Distributed Processing
Performance
Heavily Used Configuration
Transaction Rate
Online Data Entry
End User Efficiency
Online Update
Complex Processing
Reusability
Installation Ease
Operational Ease
Multiple Sites
Facilitate Change
TOTAL DEGREE OF INFLUENCE
VALUE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR

5
4
2
0
2
4
2
0
1
0
1
2
5
0
28
0.93 --->Calculated Using ((TDI*0.01)+0.65)

ted Using ((TDI*0.01)+0.65)

You might also like