Scribd
Upload
145 views

Comparative Research

This document discusses historical/comparative research methods. It begins by explaining that this method seeks patterns across cultures by tracing social developments and comparing processes. It then contrasts reactive and unobtrusive research types, with historical/comparative research falling under unobtrusive. The document outlines motivations for this research approach due to 20th century social changes. It also discusses advantages and disadvantages of historical/archival data usage as well as the logic and major types of comparative/historical analysis, including parallel demonstration of theory, contrast of contexts, and macro-causal analysis.

Uploaded by

Shikha Kashyap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
145 views

Comparative Research

This document discusses historical/comparative research methods. It begins by explaining that this method seeks patterns across cultures by tracing social developments and comparing processes. It then contrasts reactive and unobtrusive research types, with historical/comparative research falling under unobtrusive. The document outlines motivations for this research approach due to 20th century social changes. It also discusses advantages and disadvantages of historical/archival data usage as well as the logic and major types of comparative/historical analysis, including parallel demonstration of theory, contrast of contexts, and macro-causal analysis.

Uploaded by

Shikha Kashyap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Historical/Comparative Research

Seeks to discover patterns in the histories of


different cultures. This research method
appeals most to sociologists, political
scientists, historians, and anthropologists
interested in tracing the development of
social forms & institutions and comparing
these processes across cultures.

Putting Historical/Comparative
Research Into Context
Research Methods (two general types).

1: Reactive/obtrusive
Surveys, focus groups, experiments, and
some field research.

2: Unobtrusive
comparative/historical research, archival
research, content analysis

Putting Historical/Comparative
Research Into Context (2)
Where do History and Sociology intersect and
differ?
General (nomothetic) -- prevailing mode in
sociology.
Specific (idiographic) -- prevailing mode in
history.
Types of Research
explanatory -- more prevalent in sociology
descriptive -- more prevalent in history

The Rise of Historical/Comparative


Research: Motivations
Political/Social Context of Social Change in the
20th Century
Totalitarianism in Germany and Russia
Transitions to socialism
Resistance movements
Nationalist movements

Early Examples (Comte, Durkheim, Marx,


Weber)

Historical and Archival Data


Statistical (quantitative) Data
public
private
examples
Durkheims study of suicide
Princeton project

Non-statistical (qualitative) Data


example
Diaries in family research

Advantages and Disadvantages of


Historical and Archival Data
Advantages
Nonreactivity, wealth of information.

Disadvantages
Representativeness
Accuracy of information
Categories or definitions are interpreted or
socially constructed
Selective destruction of records

Logic of Historical/Comparative
Analysis
A. Data in Comparative/Historical Analysis
Number of cases
Units of analysis
Variables

B. Use of comparisons
helps to validate theories and hypotheses.
The reason for using comparisons depends on which of
the following three major types of H/C analysis is being
used.

Three Major Types of


Comparative/Historical Analysis.
1. Parallel Demonstration of Theory
2. Contrast of Contexts
3. Macro-causal Analysis

1. Parallel Demonstration of
Theory
Purpose - show that a theory applies in
many cases
How are cases selected? - so they are
different from each other
Critique - selectivity bias
Not really theory testing, but theory presenting

2. Contrast of Contexts
Purpose - to show that processes are
distinctive; cannot be reduced to universal
principles or theory.
Selection of cases - select cases that appear
to be similar
Critique - doesnt help develop alternative
explanations.

3. Macro-causal Analysis
Purpose # 1 - developing new explanations
Purpose # 2 - setting scope conditions for
theory
Method of Agreement
Method of Difference
Critiques

Method of Agreement
1. Select cases with same outcome (dependent
variable)
2. Compare possible causal factors across cases
3. Try to isolate one or a few features that are the
SAME across cases
4. Conclude that this is the causal factor producing
the similar outcome
Example from Skocpols States and Social
Revolutions

Example of Method of Agreement:


Causes of Revolution in Russia, China, and France
Cause

Russia

China

France

Differences: type of government, religion, level of


industrialization, and other factors
State Breakdown
+
Peasant Revolt
||
Revolution

Yes
+
Yes
||
Yes

Yes
+
Yes
||
Yes

Yes
+
Yes
||
Yes

Method of Difference
1. Select cases with different outcomes (dependent
variable)
2. Compare possible causal factors across cases
3. Try to isolate one or a few features that are
DIFFERENT across cases
4. Conclude that this is the decisive difference (i.e.
the causal factor) producing different outcomes.
Another Example from Skocpols States and
Social Revolutions

Example of Method of Difference:


Causes of Revolution in France and Germany
Causes
Fragmented elites
Military threat
Village autonomy high,
so peasants could revolt
||
Successful Revolution

France
Yes
Yes
Yes

Germany in 1848
Yes
Yes
No

||
Yes

||
No

Critiques of Macro-Causal
Analysis
1. Researcher must assume deterministic causality
2. Measurement error esp. in coding of ordinal
and interval variables
3. Might have multiple causes or interaction
effects
4. Unlikely that you could measure all causal
factors major omitted variable bias problems
5. Selection on the dependent variable

Integration of Theory and


Analysis
Essential link between theory development
and causal analysis
Analysis of small N may not be generalizable
Theory developed w/o reference to analysis
may be even less generalizable (may be
completely unsupported)
Need to test theory with analysis
Need to refine theory based on findings of
analytic research

You might also like