Scribd
Upload
40 views

6.3. The Soil

The document discusses modeling techniques for analyzing turbine foundations. It describes how brick elements are commonly used but have limitations, while beam elements provide a more attractive choice for modeling turbine rafts due to better performance and ease of use. The document also discusses modeling the soil, with options like 3D brick elements, 2D plane strain elements, or discrete springs. Modeling the soil as frequency-independent linear springs based on published formulas is a common practice. When modeling the soil as a continuum, the extent of the soil domain should be 3-5 times the foundation dimensions laterally and 5 times the depth.

Uploaded by

buds70
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views

6.3. The Soil

The document discusses modeling techniques for analyzing turbine foundations. It describes how brick elements are commonly used but have limitations, while beam elements provide a more attractive choice for modeling turbine rafts due to better performance and ease of use. The document also discusses modeling the soil, with options like 3D brick elements, 2D plane strain elements, or discrete springs. Modeling the soil as frequency-independent linear springs based on published formulas is a common practice. When modeling the soil as a continuum, the extent of the soil domain should be 3-5 times the foundation dimensions laterally and 5 times the depth.

Uploaded by

buds70
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Jayarajan P., Kouzer K.M.

the eight nodded brick element usually have poor


approximation capability and higher order elements having 16
or 24 nodes are usually used for efficient solution. Besides this
brick element suffers from one serious lacunae in terms of
design. Brick elements in most of the commercially available
software give output in terms of normal and shear stress
parameters whereas for the turbine raft design we are basically
looking for output in terms of moment, shear and torsion. The
back calculation of these design parameters from the computer
output is extremely tedious. In terms of ease of use as well as
convergence of results, beam elements do make a very
attractive choice for modelling the turbine raft.
6.3. The Soil
The basic soil parameter which needs to be known to
mathematically model the soil is dynamic shear modulus (Gs).
The soil being a continuum itself can either be modelled based
on FEM as 3D brick elements, 2D plane strain elements or
discrete springs. For the particular case of turbine foundation
analysis, the common practice is to model the soil as
frequency independent linear springs based on Richart or
Wolfs springs. In this approach, the soil is represented by a
set of three translational springs, attached at each node at the
base of the foundation in contact with the soil. Approximate
formulae for computation of dynamic stiffness of rigid
foundations (frequency dependent & independent) can be
found in [2,7].
In case soil is modelled as a continuum, it becomes
necessary to confine it to a finite domain and accordingly the
extent of soil domain to be modelled becomes an important
issue. Though there is no definite answer to this, experience
shows that soil domain equal to three to five times the lateral
dimensions in plan on either side of the foundation and five
times along the depth should work out to be reasonably good.
If the soil profile indicates the presence of layered media,
appropriate soil properties are assigned to the respective soil
layers.

6.4. The Machine


Machine is relatively rigid compared to the foundation and
soil. While modeling the machine, the broad objective is to
represent the machine in such a way that its mass is truly
reflected, and CG of the overall mass of the model matches
with that of the prototype. Thus, modeling of the machine with
rigid links or rigid-beam elements is considered good enough.
Machine mass is considered lumped at appropriate locations
so as to correctly simulate the CG location. This should be
cross-checked with the mass distribution given by the
supplier/manufacturer. [3] provides guidelines for advanced
modelling of machine including the rotor and stator.
7. DYNAMIC LOADS
The main dynamic loads acting on the turbine foundation
during its operation are caused by the unbalance of the
rotating parts with a frequency corresponding to the operating

33
speed. These loads are normally provided by the machine
manufacturer. In case these loads are not available, they may
be calculated via the balance quality grade of the rotor.
The balance quality grade G is the product of the
maximum permissible eccentricity e (mm) and the
maximum angular velocity of the rotor (rad/s) as shown
in Figure 4. In industry, balance quality grades are usually
determined in accordance with ISO 1940-1 [6]. They are
separated from each other by a factor of 2.5. For turbines
and generators, the intended balance quality grade is usually
G=2.5 mm/s. The resultant unbalanced load F(t) (N) is
calculated with the rotating mass m (kg) and the balance
quality grade G (mm/s) as follows.
F(t) = m e

Figure 4. Scheme of unbalance loads

8. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Dynamic analysis of turbine foundation is done after
modelling, mass lumping at appropriate locations and
application of dynamic loads are completed. The dynamic
analysis is performed in two stages, namely free vibration
analysis to obtain all natural frequencies and forced
vibration analysis to obtain peak response of the foundation
under dynamic loads. Detailed procedure for performing
dynamic analysis of different structural systems can be
found in [4]. The number of significant modes to be
considered for the analysis shall be based on modal mass
participation factor. The number of modes that excite at least
95-99% of the mass should be considered in the analysis.
Further the highest natural frequency calculated should be at
least ten percent higher than the operating frequency of the
machine [5].
9. EXAMPLE
A table top framed foundation shall be constructed for
the proposed turbo-generator with the following data.
Operating frequency of machine = 4500 rpm.
Centre line axis of shaft =1.950m above the top deck
All columns = 1200 x 1000 mm
Top of deck slab = EL 108.000 (100.000-GL)
Bottom of foundation raft = EL 96.750
Thickness of foundation raft = 1500 mm
Thickness of top deck slab = 1000 mm
Shear modulus of soil (from geotechnical report)
Gs = 545.5 MPa (as per client specification dynamic analysis
shall also be performed for 0.75*Gs & 1.25*Gs). Various

Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology


Print ISSN: 2349-8404; Online ISSN: 2349-879X; Volume 1, Number 4; August, 2014

You might also like