Scribd
Upload
143 views

Competence Versus Performance

The document discusses the difference between competence and performance in language learning. Competence refers to one's underlying knowledge of a language, while performance involves using language in real-world situations. It is difficult to measure competence without assessing performance. The distinction is important because it differentiates between errors due to lack of knowledge versus temporary performance issues. In language classrooms, the focus has traditionally been more on developing competence through drills, but a more communicative approach emphasizes performance and using language authentically.

Uploaded by

meganjennifer21
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
143 views

Competence Versus Performance

The document discusses the difference between competence and performance in language learning. Competence refers to one's underlying knowledge of a language, while performance involves using language in real-world situations. It is difficult to measure competence without assessing performance. The distinction is important because it differentiates between errors due to lack of knowledge versus temporary performance issues. In language classrooms, the focus has traditionally been more on developing competence through drills, but a more communicative approach emphasizes performance and using language authentically.

Uploaded by

meganjennifer21
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Competence versus Performance

How do we know that students have learned a language? We can assess students using
formative and summative assessments but how do we know that students will actually be
able to use their language in real-life, authentic situations? In short, how do we know that
our students are competent in the target language? One way to judge this competency is
through students performance. However, how do we know that this performance is an
accurate measure of what students actually know? In this
section we will examine these questions further by looking at
competence versus performance.

What is the difference between competence and


performance?
Chomsky separates competence and performance; he describes 'competence' as an
idealized capacity that is located as a psychological or mental property or function and
performance as the production of actual utterances. In short, competence involves
knowing the language and performance involves doing something with the language.
The difficulty with this construct is that it is very difficult to assess competence without
assessing performance.

Why is it important to make a distinction between


competence and performance?

Noting the distinction between competence and performance is useful primarily because it
allows those studying a language to differentiate between a speech error and not knowing
something about the
language. To understand
this distinction, it is
helpful to think about a
time when you've made
some sort of error in your
speech. For example, let's
say you are a native
speaker of English and
utter the following:
We swimmed in the ocean
this weekend.
Is this error due to
competence or
performance? It is most
likely that as a native
speaker you are aware
how to conjugate
irregular verbs in the past
but your performance has
let you down this time.
Linguists use the
distinction between
competence and
performance to illustrate
the intuitive difference
between accidentally
saying swimmed and the
fact that a child or nonproficient speaker of English may not know that the past tense of swim is swam and say
swimmed consistently.

How do competence and performance apply to the


language classroom?
As we have learned, competence and performance involve knowing and doing. In the
recent past, many language instruction programs have focused more on the knowing
(competence) part of learning a language wherein words and sentences are presented and
practiced in a way to best help learners internalize the forms. The assumption here is that
once the learners have learned the information they will be able to use it through reading,
writing, listening and speaking. The disadvantage of this approach is that the learners are
unable to use the language in a natural way. Having been trained to learn the language

through knowing, learners have difficulty reversing this training and actually doing
something with the language. In brief, it is difficult to assess whether the learners
insufficient proficiency is due to limitations of competency or a lack of performance.
In order to focus learners more on the doing part of learning, which allows a more
accurate measure of learners language proficiency, a more communicative approach to
teaching can be used. This type of approach concentrates on getting learners to do things
with the language.

You might also like