Invitation To A Trashing
Invitation To A Trashing
INVITATION TO A TRASHING
I have just had the privilege of attending the trashing of one of the most prominent Lesbian
writers and editors in the world. And what a trashing it was! It leaves me breathless to
think about it! The disruption of the evening's format, the blazing denunciations from the
stage, the manipulation of the shocked audience - and, most unforgettable - the pain,
This was not your ordinary trashing. This was a championship trashing. The trashee had
these to publish the world's first anthology of Lesbian culture - for which she has yet to see
any money. And here she was, in a major city, on a book tour she partially financed
herself, for the sake of the pride she took in the work and the measure of recognition she
So she had made it through all the elimination trials to make it to the final round, where her
book would be trashed in a room full of other Lesbian writers by one of the very contributors
1
to the anthology! No, ma'am, this was not your ordinary Saturday night, small-town potluck
trashing. This was a grandmama of them all, a trashing to out-trash all trashings. It was
the trashing of a lifetime which would result in the author's retirement from thirty years of
Lesbian activism.
But it is not my purpose here to narrate the circumstances of that infamous evening. I
confronted the dynamic and walked out. Let others tell what happened. I want to talk about
trashing as a means of social control. I want us all to spend a little time considering this
phenomenon, how it works, how we respond to it, and maybe - just maybe - give some
A DEFINITION OF TRASHING
the rhetoric of honest conflict, or covered up by denying that any disapproval exists at all.
and destroy."1
WHO TO TRASH
2
A WOMAN WHO IS ACHIEVING THINGS: Otherwise, what's the point?
A WOMAN WHO BELIEVES IN COMMUNITY: "Community" does not really exist, but the
woman who believes in it, will bare her soul to conference rooms full of strangers, will
attempt dialogue with blatant agitators, and will plead her case with anonymous readers of
publications - in every instance digging a deeper grave for herself. Again, very desirable.
A WOMAN WHO MAKES MISTAKES: You've got to catch her in a real mistake, but
woman with a visible disability, or an old woman. Depending on the level of achievement
and the quality of their mistake, you may succeed in trashing a fat woman, a diabetic
woman, a working class woman - as long as she is white. This was the case in the trashing
I witnessed. (Note: Separatists make excellent targets. Chances are, nobody will be in
their corner.) Trashing rich women is not advisable, but then most trashers seem to know
3
this.
A WOMAN WHO IS UNDERPAID: This is not essential, but it helps, because the woman
whose achievements are not remunerated financially is generally very hungry for
recognition and appreciation. This raises the stakes for her at the trashing, which makes
for better sport - much as not feeding the bear will enhance the bear-baiting.
A WOMAN WHO HAS OPPOSED THE TRASHING OF OTHERS: Get her. She's out to
COVERT PARTICIPATION: Validate the trasher's action by addressing the issue, instead
of the abusive dynamic. You can do this by defending the trashee to the trasher. Very safe.
You get to look loyal, but you're really right on the trasher's agenda.
OVERT PARTICIPATION: Just sit there and say nothing. You can pretend you're not
involved.
4
Speak out! Confront the abusive dynamic of the trasher, name the specific behaviors,
demand that trasher stop or be removed, and if the trashing continues in any form, leave. If
enough women did this, trashing as we know it would become extinct. Fortunately,
trashers have established a well-known precedent for trashing women who threaten to
remove them (patriarchal collaborators), trashing women who insist on sticking to the
agenda (classist, racist, ableist, etc.), trashing women who object to disrespectful and
violent action (classist and/or collaborationist), and trashing women who walk out (avoiding
1) PICK A PUBLIC FORUM. Trashing requires mobilization of public opinion, which is why
you can't trash in a one-on-one confrontation. Besides, one-on-one means the possibility of
there being dialogue. Dialogue runs directly counter to the objectives of trashing.
2) DO NOT WARN THE TRASHEE. The element of surprise is very important. If she has
had time to prepare for the issue, to arrange her arguments, to strategize - well, it puts her
on equal footing with you, the trasher. And if you could hold your own as her equal, you
5
3) OUTNUMBER HER. Very important. If she is allowed an equal number of supporters,
again we are talking productive dialogue - and that is not going to ruin anybody's reputation.
Keep your eye on your goals. Just because she may believe you are serious about the
issues you raise, as the trasher you have a responsibility to keep you eye on your real
4) DISRUPT. Storm the stage, seize the podium, rise in the audience and challenge the
performers, or - if you are a legitimate presenter - deliver something that is not part of the
program. Surprise always gives you an unfair advantage, and unfair advantage is the
name of the game. There is an additional edge if you are trashing in front of a group of
women: Aggressive disruptions will trigger dissociative states for many women who are
survivors. They will numb out, go into shock, or become desperately invested in showing
solidarity with anyone who even looks like they have the potential to become violent - and
5) FOCUS ON THE FLAW! Take it out of context. Do not put it in perspective. Amplify,
magnify, distort! Use hyperbole, use rhetoric, make inflammatory associations. If the
speaker, organizer, or writer has made an ignorant or insensitive mistake, don't hesitate to
characterize it as deliberate! Assume that she identifies with her mistake, that it represents
6
scenario. The transcripts of the McCarthy hearings may provide some useful pointers.
so much the better! You will be very persuasive. A woman registering powerful emotion
has a very good shot at triggering survivors or co-dependents - even if the emotion is not
appropriate to the circumstances. In fact, the more inappropriate, the better the trigger.
Make it look as if the trashee has been inaccessible or unresponsive to your concerns,
leaving you no option except this form of confrontation. (In point of fact, you have probably
never made the slightest attempt to contact her prior to the trashing.) Speak to the Lesbian
artist or activist as if she were evil incarnate. Speak to her as if she were the fountainhead
of all oppressions, especially those which are not your own. This is finally your chance to
really project your rage and frustration where it will do some damage. Go for it!
6) DENOUNCE! And here is where we are getting to the heart of the matter. This is it.
This is the trashing. Don't just criticize a chapter, or a presentation, or a policy - Indict the
entire book, the entire conference, the entire organization. And if it's a book, indict the
press that published it, the bookstores that carry it, the women who buy it! Declare it so
evil, it never should have come into existence at all! Take no prisoners!
7
careful. A good trashing is engineered to involve few risks for the trasher, but this is one
area where you could lose your edge. Do not attack the woman personally, because this
will show your hand. Do it by implication. Do it by omission. If you have erased her
trashed her work, you will not need to specifically attack her character. This is the point of
the trashing, and so it is hard to resist, but you must avoid any show of personal animosity
in order to retain your own credibility. You need to maintain your image as a radical and
courageous. If the audience caught wind of just how reactionary and cowardly your actions
8) END BY DECLARING YOURSELF AN ALLY. Act like you are trying to help the woman
you are destroying. Don't hesitate to present yourself to her or to anyone else as an ally in
the deepest sense of the word. In fact, put the trashee on the spot by asking her to validate
this. Again, this will help to mask your agenda. If the trashee is a survivor of abuse, she
can be easily confused by declarations of this sort, because it has been a survival skill for
her to rationalize abuse and focus on empty gestures of support. By all means, exploit her
conditioning!
9) LET IT GO! Yes, gloat, savor, enjoy your victory. You deserve it. But let it go, because
in the weeks or months to come the trashee may kill herself, she may have a nervous
8
breakdown, she may quit the organization to which she has given her life's blood - taking it
down with her, she may go mainstream, she may even retire from thirty years of activism.
You don't want that on your conscience. I mean, let's face it... You've already got all the
guilt and shame you can handle. Why else would you be trashing?
-------------------
The trashing of Julia Penelope was shameful, and her response was appropriate and
consistent with her commitment to Lesbian separatism. It is my hope that her pain from the
trashing and the loss we will suffer from her retirement will not have been for nothing.
The McCarthy era witch-hunts ended when McCarthy finally named someone with such
impeccable credentials that someone rose from the floor to demand, "Sir, have you no
decency?" The Communist witch-hunts ended because the country - saturated with
paranoia and censorship, sated with suicides, blasted careers, wasted lives, and the loss of
It is my hope that Julia Penelope will be the last Lesbian to be subjected to a publicly
supported trashing. I am grateful to Julia for her courage in coming forward with her pain
and for her decision to retire, which has brought home so tragically the consequences of
9
our participation in a culture which tolerates the trashing of women.
Footnote:
1) Joreen, "Trashing: The Dark [sic] Side of Sisters," MS., April 1976. In The Feminist
Dictionary, edited by Cheris Kramarae and Paula Treichler (with Ann Russo). Boston:
10