Proposal Writing
Proposal Writing
Proposal Writing
For
ewor
d
Forewor
eword
The Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition is pleased to present the second edition
of our resource manual: Strategies for Effective Proposal Writing. Whether you are
nervously anticipating writing your first grant proposal or are a seasoned grant-writer,
it is our hope that this manual will assist you in developing a coherent and fundable
proposal.
Originally developed as a companion resource for a Proposal Writing Workshop, this
manual has evolved into a resource that can also be used on its own. It provides some
guidelines to help your organization decide whether or not to apply for funding and a
step-by-step process by which to proceed.
It is important to remember that just as every community is different, so too are
funders. Your own research is critical in developing suitable funding contacts in your
area and to tailoring your approach appropriately.
Although we obviously can make no guarantees, we wish you every success as you put
pen to paper. Lets get started!
Repr
oduction
Reproduction
You are free:
* to copy, distribute, or display this document
* to make derivative works
Under the following conditions:
Attribution. You must give the original author credit (Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition)
Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting
work only under a license identical to this one.
* For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
* Any of these conditions can be waived with written permission from the Ontario Healthy
Communities Coalition.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ......................................................................5
The Funding Environment
Types of Foundations
II. Laying the Groundwork .....................................................6
Do Your Homework
Contact Chart
Make a Personal Connection
Are You Ready?
Readiness Checklist
III. Hows the Fit? ...............................................................10
Fit With Your Organization Table
IV. Putting Pen to Paper ......................................................11
General Writing Tips for a Strong Proposal
Key Elements of a Proposal
Summary
Introduction
Definition of the Issues
Desired Results
- Outputs
- Outcomes
- Impact
Resources and Activities
Budget
Evaluation Plan
Sustainability
Conclusion
Appendices
V. Packaging Your Proposal ..............................................19
VI. Proposal Appraisal ........................................................19
Proposal Appraisal Template (20-21)
VII. Post-Submission Thoughts ............................................19
VIII. Web Sites for more Information & Ideas .......................22
References ......................................................................23
I. Introduction
The Funding Environment
This is a very challenging time to raise funds for non-profits, charities and community
organizations.
Increased competition due to the many new organizations being created and government cutbacks at
various levels mean greater demands on foundations, corporations and other funders. Lower interest
rates have resulted in smaller grant budgets for foundations. There is also increased competition for
revenue from other types of fundraising (i.e. special events, Nevada tickets, raffles and lotteries etc.).
Increasing demand for grants means that funders are becoming more focused, especially in the
following ways:
a strong desire to make every cent count
requirements for increased accountability are becoming more stringent (i.e. internal bookkeeping and auditing processes, formal organizational structure and evaluation practices)
increased emphasis on effective governance and management (i.e. competence, being fiscally
sound and proof of long-range planning)
increased emphasis on project-specific funding
expectations that groups who have similar objectives will work together to:
- share resources and expertise
- minimize duplication
- bring all of the right people to the table to increase the potential for
successful project outcomes
greater emphasis on sustainability
requirements for cross-sectoral collaboration.
Types of Foundations
Although there are many different types of funders, foundations are frequently approached through
the grant proposal process, which is why we mention them here.
There are two types of foundations: those who raise money and those who give it away.
Some of the hundreds of foundations in Canada who are actively making grants include:
Family foundations (e.g., McConnell Family Foundation)
Government foundations (e.g., Ontario Trillium Foundation)
Corporate foundations (e.g., Royal Bank of Canada Charitable Foundation)
Community foundations (normally established to serve a particular geographic area)
Special purpose foundations (e.g., Hospital for Sick Children Foundation)
Service club foundations (e.g., Lions, Rotary Club, Shriners etc.).
Date
Support
Written Agreement
Comments
Date
Name
Comments
Community Partners
Organization
Name
Funders
Contact Charts
laying the
groundwork
laying the
groundwork
laying the
groundwork
Need
Who
By When
Why
Vision
Mission Statement
Values Statement
Goals
Existing Programs/Services
(and relationship to above)
Who
Board of Directors (or Steering Committee)
Staffing (paid and/or volunteer)
How
Financial Information (formal/informal)
Strategic Plan
Planning Processes
Brief History
Service Record
Strategic Alliances
References
Levers
Other
OHCC, adapted with permission from the Community Social Planning Council of Toronto.
Your Organization
The Project
Service/Program
Target Group
Experience
Expertise
Budget
Community/Location
Leverage/Alliances
Supporters
Sustainability
Adapted with permission from the Community Social Planning Council of Toronto.
10
Fit (1-5)
Summary
ii
Introduction
iii
iv
Desired Results
- Outputs
- Outcomes
- Impact
vi
Budget
vii
Evaluation Plan
viii
Sustainability
ix
Conclusion
Appendices
11
putting pen
to paper
Summary
The summary is probably the most important section of the proposal. It is an umbrella
statement of your case and an overview of the entire proposal. It should be written last but
presented first. The summary should:
be no longer than two pages - be clear and concise
state the overall vision for your project
stress how and why your initiative will affect your target audience and community
briefly mention your groups track record, the issue(s) to be addressed, key outcomes,
and the methods you will use
list any resources that have already been committed, or other confirmed funding sources
be positive and exciting - you want to convince the reader to keep reading and that this
project should be considered for funding.
Introduction
Here you will provide a brief introduction to your organization and why it is the right one to carry out
the proposed activities.
Write this section second-to-last.
Describe what your group or organization does (e.g., purpose, goals, programs, activities).
Establish your groups credibility.
Describe a past success or include testimonial from a stakeholder.
Provide statistics that support your groups accomplishments.
12
putting pen
to paper
Desired Results
This section identifies the desired or intended results of your project or program by outlining
what you expect to achieve in the short and long-term. It is based on the W.K. Kellogg
Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Desired results can be divided into three
subcategories:
a) Outputs
b) Outcomes
c) Impact
a)
Outputs
Outputs are the direct results of your program activities.
They are normally described in terms of the size and scope of the products and services
delivered or produced by the program (e.g., the number of workshops conducted,
hours/days of service provided, new tools or resources developed and distributed).
They should be concrete and easily measurable.
For each program activity, identify what outputs will be, and be specific about the
intended audience(s) or client(s).
b)
Outcomes
Outcomes are specific changes in attitudes, behaviours, skills, knowledge, program
utilization, etc. that you expect to result from your program activities. There may be
unintended outcomes of your project as well; the actual outcomes of the project can only
be identified at its conclusion.
They are most commonly expressed at the individual level.
Short-term outcomes are achievable within 1 to 3 years, while longer-term outcomes are
attainable within 4 to 6 years.
It may be helpful to determine your outcomes first, prior to identifying outputs, impact,
activities and inputs.
You may have one or more outcomes; each outcome should be stated in one sentence.
Expected outcomes should be S*M*A*R*T:
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic
Timely/Tangible
They are usually introduced with action statements such as:
there will be an increase in...
there will be a decrease in...
there will be a reduction of...
the elimination of...
13
putting pen
to paper
c) Impact
impacts are organizational, community and/or system level changes that you expect will
result from your program activities.
In most cases, these changes will take place 7-10 years after program activities have been
completed.
These may include improved quality of life measures, increased capacity or changes in policy
e.g., improved health status, more diverse or self-reliant local economy, reduction in degree of
social inequalities, wide participation in decision-making
For projects with short-term goals and a narrow or limited scope, it may not be necessary to
discuss long-term impacts in much detail.
14
putting pen
to paper
What we will do
(activity)
Who will do it
When we will do it
(Start and Completion)
Adapted with permission from the Community Social Planning Council of Toronto.
15
putting pen
to paper
Budget
The budget section should demonstrate your organizations ability to manage money in an
effective and responsible manner.
Present a realistic estimate of the funds required to achieve the programs objectives.
Clearly outline the total cost of the initiative
Specify other sources of funding; in some cases, committed funding can provide leverage
to influence the granting of new/additional dollars.
Present a budget statement in a tabular manner, listing income sources and amounts first
and then expense items and amounts.
Income includes items such as:
earned income, e.g., sales of products or services
contributed income, e.g., donations, grants, fundraising activities
donations in kind, e.g., donations of labour, meeting space, use of equipment.
Expenses include items such as:
salaries and benefits
contract payments
rent and administration
program materials
travel and lodging.
Base figures on sound research.
Clearly state any assumptions you make and explain unusual items using footnotes/
endnotes.
Make sure that all calculations are accurate and that the budget balances.
Indicate your intention to follow accepted accounting procedures and keep an audit trail.
16
putting pen
to paper
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation is an important process through which you determine whether the programs
expected outcomes are achieved and how effectively the program was implemented. In this
section, you will describe how you plan to assess your programs results and/or the effectiveness of the program activities.
For medium to long-term projects, consider including a plan for evaluating success at
various stages of the project and for modifying your activities or plans if required.
Include evaluation costs in your activity budget; estimate your costs, including staff time,
materials and services required (including in-kind contributions).
Try to involve potential program participants and key project stakeholders in developing
evaluation criteria.
Establish measurable indicators of success for short and long term outcomes.
Whenever possible, evaluation plans should include both quantitative and qualitative methods:
quantitative methods focus on things that can be counted or directly measured, e.g.,
number of participants involved, number of sessions conducted,
qualitative methods are generally used to provide more in-depth information about
individual experiences, perspectives and context, e.g., subjective benefits or changes in
attitudes or perceptions reported by program participants.
Describe how the data will be collected, analyzed, and stored:
methods of collecting quantitative data include structured choice survey questions,
tracking forms and service utilization
methods of collecting qualitative data include open-ended survey questions, focus
groups, in-depth interviews, diaries/journals, or forums.
Describe how you will use and communicate the evaluation results (be sure to obtain consent from
participants before using any information that they provided).
You may find it helpful to develop a chart or logic model showing the link between activities,
outcomes and indicators of your initiative (see below).
Example:
Activities
Outcomes
Increased understanding of
the benefits and methods
of composting
Increased participation in
composting
Decrease in proportion of
waste going to landfill
Indicators of Success
17
putting pen
to paper
Sustainability
This section is necessary if there is an expectation that activities will continue past the program
or project completion date. By developing a strategy for future sustainability, the potential
funder will not feel that the benefits gained by the program will be lost after the grant period
expires.
Show how the initiative will be supported in the future:
if applicable, describe your plans to continue the activities beyond the granting period (e.g.,
continue as a volunteer-run initiative, collaborate with other organizations)
present a detailed plan to obtain future funding or support from alternative sources.
Conclusion
Here you will make your final comments in support of the proposal. In one or two paragraphs, briefly
restate what you want to do and why it is important.
Emphasize leverage:
strategic alliances or partnerships
sustainability
value for the money
coordinated timing.
Express confidence in your proposal.
Appendices
Generally speaking, all of the really important information should be included in the body of the
proposal. The appendices include supplemental information such as the following:
Board of Directors list
the names and contact information of references
testimonials, endorsements or letters of support
legal documents
financial documents
annual report
publications including brochures or newsletters
relevant articles or summaries of reports
media clippings or publicity items.
If you are including references, ensure that the referees have consented and are familiar with your
organization and with the proposal. Send them a copy of your proposal in advance and be sure to
follow-up with a call to discuss it.
18
19
Proposal Appraisal
Component
1. Overall Impression
1.1 Title
1.2 Logical Flow
1.3 Layout/Visual Attractiveness
1.4 Grammar
1.5 Spelling
2. Summary
2.1 Appears at the beginning of the proposal
2.2 Identifies the grant applicant
2.3 Includes at least one sentence on
credibility
2.4 Includes at least one sentence on expected
outcomes
2.5 Includes total cost, funds already obtained
and amount requested in this proposal
2.6 Is brief/succinct
2.7 Is clear
2.8 Is interesting
2.9 Is motivating
3. Definition of Issues
3.1 Relevance
3.2 Evidence
3.3 Logic
4. Credibility
4.1 History
4.2 Track record
4.3 Partners/Advisors
5. Desired Results
5.1 Specifies outputs, outcomes and impact
5.2 Specific
5.3 Measurable
5.4 Attainable
5.5 Realistic
5.6 Timely
5.7 Describes the specific population that will benefit
20
Yes
No
Rating
(1-5)
Comments/Suggestions
Component
Yes
No Rating (1-5)
Comments/Suggestions
7. Evaluation Plan
7.1 Presents a plan for evaluating accomplishment
of outcomes
7.2 Presents a plan for evaluating and modifying
methods over the course of the program/project
7.3 Identifies who will be doing the evaluation and
how they were chosen
7.4 Clearly states criteria of success
7.5 Describes how data will be gathered
7.6 Explains any tools or questionnaires to be used
7.7 Describes the process of data analysis
7.8 Describes how evaluation results will be shared
8. Budget
8.1 Income
8.2 Expenses
8.3 Evidence that cost estimates are based on
sound research
9. Leverage
9.1 Alliances/Partnerships
9.2 Sustainability
9.3 Demonstrates clear value for the money
10. Conclusion
10.1 Concise
10.2 Demonstrates a level of confidence
OHCC, adapted from the Grantsmanship Centre Training Programs and The Community Social Planning Council of Toronto.
21
Fundraising
www.mapnp.org/library/fndrsng/np_raise/fndraise.htm
- overview of nonprofit fundraising sources and approaches
www.charityvillage.com/cv/guides/guide3.asp
- Charity Villages extensive guide of fundraising resources
www.ec.gc.ca/fund_e.html
- list of funding programs for environmental groups compiled by Environment Canada (also in French)
www.pch.gc.ca/progs/pc-cp/pubs/e/fr4gras1.htm
- Fundraising Ideas That Work for Grassroots Groups, by Ken Wyman (also in French)
www.grassrootsfundraising.org
- practical tips and tools to help you raise money for your organization
Pr
ogram Planning and Evaluation
Program
www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide and Evaluation Handbook
www.thcu.ca/infoandresources.htm
- Information and resources on Health Promotion Planning and Evaluation from The Health
Communications Unit (some resources available in French)
national.unitedway.org/outcomes/
- United Way of Americas Outcome Measurement Resource Network
www.innonet.org/
- Innovation Network provides tools and instruction for creating detailed program and evaluation plans
(free registration required)
22
References
The information contained in this manual was compiled from a variety of sources, including the
following:
Big Online: Canadas Leading Source of Funding Information
Metasoft Systems - www.bigdatabase.com
Community Social Planning Council of Toronto, Karen Liberman
Writing Effective Funding Proposals: Practice Makes Perfect
W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Logic Model Development Guide - www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281
Kiritz, Norton J.
Proposal Checklist and Evaluation Form, The Grantsmanship Center
The Ontario Trillium Foundation
Presentation Notes: Joanne Richmond, Jacqueline Powell, Inga Lubbock
The Foundation Centre
A Proposal Writing Short Course - fdncenter.org/learn/shortcourse/prop1.html
van Rotterdam, Ingrid
Building Foundation Partnerships - Chapter 5: p. 49 - 64
Canadian Centre for Philanthropy
Your comments on this manual are most welcome! Please contact our central office:
phone: (416) 408-4841
toll free: 1-800-766-3418
email: [email protected]
23