0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views

Study Guide Mid Term International Economics

The document provides an overview of international economics and outlines the organization of the textbook. It discusses seven key themes: gains from trade, pattern of trade, protectionism, balance of payments, exchange rates, policy coordination, and international capital markets. It also summarizes the contents of Section I which covers international trade theory through successive trade models of increasing complexity.

Uploaded by

Arturo Quiñones
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views

Study Guide Mid Term International Economics

The document provides an overview of international economics and outlines the organization of the textbook. It discusses seven key themes: gains from trade, pattern of trade, protectionism, balance of payments, exchange rates, policy coordination, and international capital markets. It also summarizes the contents of Section I which covers international trade theory through successive trade models of increasing complexity.

Uploaded by

Arturo Quiñones
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Chapter1

Introduction
Chapter Organization

WhatIsInternationalEconomicsAbout?
TheGainsfromTrade
ThePatternofTrade
HowMuchTrade?
BalanceofPayments
ExchangeRateDetermination
InternationalPolicyCoordination
TheInternationalCapitalMarket
InternationalEconomics:TradeandMoney

Chapter Overview
Theintentofthischapteristoprovidebothanoverviewofthesubjectmatterofinternationaleconomics
andtoprovideaguidetotheorganizationofthetext.Itisrelativelyeasyforaninstructortomotivatethe
studyofinternationaltradeandfinance.Thefrontpagesofnewspapers,thecoversofmagazines,and
theleadreportsontelevisionnewsbroadcastsheraldtheinterdependenceoftheU.S.economywiththe
restoftheworld.Thisinterdependencemayalsoberecognizedbystudentsthroughtheirpurchasesof
importsofallsortsofgoods,theirpersonalobservationsoftheeffectsofdislocationsduetointernational
competition,andtheirexperiencethroughtravelabroad.
Thestudyofthetheoryofinternationaleconomicsgeneratesanunderstandingofmanykeyeventsthat
shapeourdomesticandinternationalenvironment.Inrecenthistory,theseeventsincludethecausesand
consequencesofthelargecurrentaccountdeficitsoftheUnitedStates;thedramaticappreciationofthe
dollarduringthefirsthalfofthe1980sfollowedbyitsrapiddepreciationinthesecondhalfofthe1980s;
theLatinAmericandebtcrisisofthe1980sandtheMexicancrisisinlate1994;andtheincreasedpressures
forindustryprotectionagainstforeigncompetitionbroadlyvoicedinthelate1980sandmorevocally
espousedinthefirsthalfofthe1990s.ThefinancialcrisisthatbeganinEastAsiain1997andspreadto
manycountriesaroundtheglobeandtheEconomicandMonetaryUnioninEuropehighlightedthewayin
whichvariousnationaleconomiesarelinkedandhowimportantitisforustounderstandtheseconnections.
Thesegloballinkageshavebeenhighlightedyetagainwiththerapidspreadofthefinancialcrisisinthe
UnitedStatestotherestoftheworld.Atthesametime,protestsatglobaleconomicmeetingsandarising
waveofprotectionistrhetorichavehighlightedoppositiontoglobalization.Thetextmaterialwillenable
studentstounderstandtheeconomiccontextinwhichsucheventsoccur.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter2WorldTrade:AnOverview4

Chapter1ofthetextpresentsdatademonstratingthegrowthintradeandtheincreasingimportanceof
internationaleconomics.Thischapteralsohighlightsandbrieflydiscussesseventhemeswhicharise
throughoutthebook.Thesethemesare(1)thegainsfromtrade;(2)thepatternoftrade;(3)protectionism;(4)
thebalanceofpayments;(5)exchangeratedetermination;(6)internationalpolicycoordination;and(7)
theinternationalcapitalmarket.Studentswillrecognizethatmanyofthecentralpolicydebatesoccurring
todaycomeundertherubricofoneofthesethemes.Indeed,itisoftenafruitfulheuristictousecurrent
eventstoillustratetheforceofthekeythemesandargumentswhicharepresentedthroughoutthetext.

OverviewofSectionI:
InternationalTradeTheory
SectionIofthetextconsistsofsevenchapters:
Chapter2WorldTrade:AnOverview
Chapter3LaborProductivityandComparativeAdvantage:TheRicardianModel
Chapter4SpecificFactorsandIncomeDistribution
Chapter5ResourcesandTrade:TheHeckscherOhlinModel
Chapter6TheStandardTradeModel
Chapter7ExternalEconomiesofScaleandtheInternationalLocationofProduction
Chapter8

FirmsintheGlobalEconomy:ExportDecisions,Outsourcing,andMultinational
Enterprises

nSection I Overview
SectionIofthetextpresentsthetheoryofinternationaltrade.Theintentofthissectionistoexplore
themotivesforandimplicationsofpatternsoftradebetweencountries.Thepresentationproceedsby
introducingsuccessivelymoregeneralmodelsoftrade,wherethegeneralityisprovidedbyincreasingthe
numberoffactorsusedinproduction,byincreasingthemobilityoffactorsofproductionacrosssectors
oftheeconomy,byintroducingmoregeneraltechnologiesappliedtoproduction,andbyexamining
differenttypesofmarketstructure.ThroughoutSectionI,policyconcernsandcurrentissuesareused
toemphasizetherelevanceofthetheoryofinternationaltradeforinterpretingandunderstandingour
economy.
Chapter2givesabriefoverviewofworldtrade.Inparticular,itdiscusseswhatweknowaboutthequantities
andpatternofworldtradetoday.Thechapterusestheempiricalrelationshipknownasthegravitymodel
asaframeworktodescribetrade.Thisframeworkdescribestradeasafunctionofthesizeoftheeconomies
involvedandtheirdistance.Itcanthenbeusedtoseewherecountriesaretradingmoreorlessthanexpected.
2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction5

Thechapteralsonotesthegrowthinworldtradeoverthepreviousdecadesandusesthepreviouseraof
globalization(preWWI)asacontextfortodaysexperience.
Chapter3introducesinternationaltradetheorythroughaframeworkknownastheRicardianmodelof
trade.Thismodeladdressestheissueofwhytwocountrieswouldwanttotradewitheachother.This
modelshowshowmutuallybeneficialtradeariseswhentherearetwocountries,eachwithonefactorof
productionthatcanbeappliedtowardproducingeachoftwogoods.Keyconceptsareintroduced,suchas
theproductionpossibilitiesfrontier,comparativeadvantageversusabsoluteadvantage,gainsfromtrade,
relativeprices,andrelativewagesacrosscountries.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction6

Chapter4presentstheSpecificFactorsmodelinwhichgoodsareproducedusingonefactorthatismobile
betweenindustriesandonefactorthatisspecifictothatindustry.Theadvantageofthismodeloverthe
simpleRicardianmodelisthatithighlightsthedistributionaleffectsoftrade,withsomesectorsofsociety
gainingandothersectorslosingeventhoughthenetwelfareeffectoftradeisagain.Thesedistributional
effectsoftradehighlightthecommonlyvoicedoppositionstofreetrade,andthischapterexaminesthree
reasonswhyprotectionismisaninefficientmethodfordealingwiththelossesfromtrade.Thechapter
concludeswithanapplicationoftheSpecificFactorsmodeltointernationallabormigration,focusing
againonthedistributionaleffectsoffreetradeinlabor.
Chapter5introduceswhatisknownastheclassicHeckscherOhlinmodelofinternationaltrade.Usingthis
framework,youcanworkthroughtheeffectsoftradeonwages,prices,andoutput.Manyimportantand
intuitiveresultsarederivedinthischapterincluding:theRybczynskitheorem,theStolperSamuelson
theorem,andtheFactorPriceEqualizationtheorem.ImplicationsoftheHeckscherOhlinmodelforthe
patternoftradeamongcountriesarediscussed,asarethefailuresofempiricalevidencetoconfirmthe
predictionsofthetheory.Thechapteralsointroducesquestionsofpoliticaleconomyintrade.Oneimportant
reasonforthisadditiontothemodelistoconsidertheeffectsoftradeonincomedistribution.Thisapproach
showsthatwhilenationsgenerallygainfrominternationaltrade,itisquitepossiblethatspecificgroupswithin
thesenationscouldbeharmedbythistrade.Thisdiscussion,andrelatedquestionsaboutprotectionismversus
globalization,becomesbroaderandevenmoreinterestingasyouworkthroughthemodelsanddifferent
assumptionsofsubsequentchapters.
Chapter6presentsageneralmodelofinternationaltrade,whichadmitsthemodelsoftheprevious
chaptersasspecialcases.Thisstandardtrademodelisdepictedgraphicallybyageneralequilibrium
trademodelasappliedtoasmallopeneconomy.Relativedemandandrelativesupplycurvesareusedto
analyzeavarietyofpolicyissues,suchastheeffectsofeconomicgrowth,thetransferproblem,andthe
effectsoftradetariffsandproductionsubsidies.TheAppendixtothechapterdevelopscurveanalysis.
Whileanextremelyusefultool,thestandardmodeloftradefailstoaccountforsomeimportantaspects
ofinternationaltrade.Specifically,whilethefactorproportionsHeckscherOhlintheoriesexplainsome
tradeflowsbetweencountries,recentresearchininternationaleconomicshasplacedanincreasing
emphasisoneconomiesofscaleinproductionandimperfectcompetitionamongfirms.
Chapter7isthefirstoftwochapterstoreflectthesedevelopmentsininternationaltradetheory.Withexternal
economiesofscale,averagecostsinanindustryfallasindustrialproductionrises(thoughnotnecessarily
theproductionofanyonefirminthatindustry).Asaresult,whentwocountriestrade,itmakessenseto
concentrateproductioninonecountryasthiswillleadtolowercoststhansplittingproductionacrosstwo
countries.Aswiththetrademodelspresentedinpreviouschapters,countrieswiththelowestproduction
costswillbeexporters,butinthiscase,thesourceoflowcostsisnotdrivenbydifferencesintechnology
orfactorendowments.Rather,acountrywithanestablishedindustrywillbemorecompetitivethanone
inwhichtheindustryhastostartfromscratch.Thisistrueeveniftheestablishedcountrywouldnotbe
thelowestcostproducerifbothcountriesstartedoffatthesamelevelofproduction.Thissuggeststhata
countrycouldbemadebetteroffbyclosingofffromtrade,thoughsuchcasesaredifficulttoidentifyand
thisformofprotectionismmayleadtounintendedconsequencessuchasretaliatorytariffs.
Chapter8examineshowtradecanbedrivenbyinternaleconomiesofscaleandmonopolisticcompetition.
Aninternaleconomyofscaleexistswhenafirmsaveragecostsdeclineasthatfirmincreasesitsproduction.
Suchasituationleadstoamodelofimperfectcompetition(thereareafewlargefirmsratherthanmany
smallfirms),anditcanbeusedtoexplainthehighdegreeofintraindustrytradeintheworld.Thechapter
concludeswithadiscussionofforeigndirectinvestment.Thedecisionbyamultinationaltoservea
foreignmarketthroughaforeignaffiliateortobreakupitsproductionchainisdrivenbyaproximity
concentrationtradeoffinwhichitmustbalanceeconomiesofscale(producingeverythinginoneplace)
2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction7

withtradecostsanddifferencesinfactorprices.Thissubjectmatterisimportantbecauseitshowshow
gainsfromtrademayariseinwaysthatarenotsuggestedbythestandardmodelsofinternationaltrade.

Chapter2
WorldTrade:AnOverview
Chapter Organization
WhoTradeswithWhom?
SizeMatters:TheGravityModel
UsingtheGravityModel:LookingforAnomalies
ImpedimentstoTrade:Distance,Barriers,andBorders
TheChangingPatternofWorldTrade
HastheWorldGottenSmaller?
WhatDoWeTrade?
ServiceOffshoring
DoOldRulesStillApply?
Summary

Chapter Overview
Beforeenteringintoaseriesoftheoreticalmodelsthatexplainwhycountriestradeacrossbordersandthe
benefitsofthistrade(Chapters311),Chapter2considersthepatternofworldtradewhichweobservetoday.
Thecoreideaofthechapteristheempiricalmodelknownasthegravitymodel.Thegravitymodelisbased
ontheobservationsthat(1)countriestendtotradewithnearbyeconomiesand(2)tradeisproportionalto
countrysize.Themodeliscalledthegravitymodel,asitissimilarinformtothephysicsequationthat
describesthepullofonebodyonanotherasproportionaltotheirsizeanddistance.
ThebasicformofthegravityequationisTijAYiYj/Dij.Thelogicsupportingthisequationisthatlarge
countrieshavelargeincomestospendonimportsandproducealargequantityofgoodstosellasexports.
Thismeansthatthelargerthateithertradepartneris,thelargerthevolumeoftradebetweenthem.Atthe
sametime,thedistancebetweentwotradepartnerscansubstituteforthetransportcoststhattheyfaceas
wellasproxyformoreintangibleaspectsofatradingrelationshipsuchastheeaseofcontactforfirms.This
modelcanbeusedtoestimatethepredictedtradebetweentwocountriesandlookforanomaliesintrade
patterns.Thetextshowsanexamplewherethegravitymodelcanbeusedtodemonstratetheimportance
ofnationalbordersindeterminingtradeflows.Accordingtomanyestimates,theborderbetweenthe
UnitedStatesandCanadahastheimpactontradeequivalenttoroughly2,000milesofdistance.Other
factorssuchastariffs,tradeagreements,andcommonlanguagecanallaffecttradeandcanbeincorporated
intothegravitymodel.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction2

Thechapteralsoconsidersthewaytradehasevolvedovertime.Whilepeopleoftenfeelthatglobalization
inthemoderneraisunprecedented,infact,weareinthemidstofthesecondgreatwaveofglobalization.
Fromtheendofthe19thcenturytoWorldWarI,theeconomiesofdifferentcountrieswerequite
connected,withtradeasashareofGDPhigherin1910thanin1960.Onlyrecentlyhavetradelevels
surpassedpreWorldWarItrade.Thenatureoftradehaschanged,though.Themajorityoftradeisin
manufacturedgoodswithagricultureandmineralproductsmakinguplessthan20percentofworldtrade.
Evendevelopingcountriesnowprimarilyexportmanufactures.Acenturyago,moretradewasinprimary
productsasnationstendedtotradeforthingsthatliterallycouldnotbegrownorfoundathome.Today,
themotivationsfortradearevariedandtheproductswetradeareincreasingindiversity.Despiteincreased
complexityinmoderninternationaltrade,thefundamentalprinciplesexplainingtradeatthedawnofthe
globalerastillapplytoday.Thechapterconcludesbyfocusingononeparticularexpansionofwhatis
tradabletheincreaseinservicestrade.Moderninformationtechnologyhasgreatlyexpandedwhat
canbetradedasthepersonstaffingacallcenter,doingyouraccounting,orreadingyourXraycanliterally
behalfwayaroundtheworld.Whileserviceoutsourcingisstillrelativelyrare,thepotentialforalarge
increaseinserviceoutsourcingisanimportantpartofhowtradewillevolveinthecomingdecades.
Thenextfewchapterswillexplainthetheoryofwhynationstrade.

Chapter3
LaborProductivityandComparative
Advantage:TheRicardianModel
Chapter Organization
TheConceptofComparativeAdvantage
AOneFactorEconomy
ProductionPossibilities
RelativePricesandSupply
TradeinaOneFactorWorld
DeterminingtheRelativePriceAfterTrade
Box:ComparativeAdvantageinPractice:TheCaseofBabeRuth
TheGainsfromTrade
ANoteonRelativeWages
Box:TheLossesfromNontrade
MisconceptionsAboutComparativeAdvantage
ProductivityandCompetitiveness
ThePauperLaborArgument

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction3

Box:DoWagesReflectProductivity?
Exploitation
ComparativeAdvantagewithManyGoods
SettingUptheModel
RelativeWagesandSpecialization
DeterminingtheRelativeWageintheMultigoodModel
AddingTransportCostsandNontradedGoods
EmpiricalEvidenceontheRicardianModel
Summary

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction4

Chapter Overview
TheRicardianmodelprovidesanintroductiontointernationaltradetheory.Thismostbasicmodelof
tradeinvolvestwocountries,twogoods,andonefactorofproduction,labor.Differencesinrelativelabor
productivityacrosscountriesgiverisetointernationaltrade.ThisRicardianmodel,simpleasitis,generates
importantinsightsconcerningcomparativeadvantageandthegainsfromtrade.Theseinsightsarenecessary
foundationsforthemorecomplexmodelspresentedinlaterchapters.
Thetextexpositionbeginswiththeexaminationoftheproductionpossibilityfrontierandtherelativeprices
ofgoodsforonecountry.Theproductionpossibilityfrontierislinearbecauseoftheassumptionofconstant
returnstoscaleforlabor,thesolefactorofproduction.Theopportunitycostofonegoodintermsoftheother
equalsthepriceratiosincepricesequalcosts,costsequalunitlaborrequirementstimeswages,andwages
areequalineachindustry.
Afterdefiningtheseconceptsforasinglecountry,asecondcountryisintroducedwhichhasdifferent
relativeunitlaborrequirements.Generalequilibriumrelativesupplyanddemandcurvesaredeveloped.
Thisanalysisdemonstratesthatatleastonecountrywillspecializeinproduction.Thegainsfromtrade
arethendemonstratedwithagraphandanumericalexample.Theintuitionofindirectproduction,thatis
producingagoodbyproducingthegoodforwhichacountryenjoysacomparativeadvantageandthen
tradingfortheothergood,isanappealingconcepttoemphasizewhenpresentingthegainsfromtrade
argument.StudentsareabletoapplytheRicardiantheoryofcomparativeadvantagetoanalyzethree
misconceptionsabouttheadvantagesoffreetrade.Eachofthethreemythsrepresentsacommon
argumentagainstfreetradeandtheflawsofeachcanbedemonstratedinthecontextofexamplesalready
developedinthechapter.Thefirstmythisthattradeisdrivenbyabsoluteadvantage.Thischapterclearly
demonstratesthatitiscomparativeadvantagethatmatters.Thesecondisthepauperlaborargument,with
poorcountrieshavinganunfairadvantageintradegivenlowcostlabor.Thechapterhighlightsthatthe
gainsfromtradeareirrelevanttothesourceofcomparativeadvantage.Finally,themythofworkersin
poorcountriesbeingexploitedbytradeisexposedbyaskingwhethertheseworkerswouldbebetteroff
withouttrade.Asthenumericalexampleinthischapterdemonstrates,theanswerisaresoundingno.
Whiletheinitialintuitionsaredevelopedinthecontextofatwogoodmodel,itisstraightforwardtoextend
themodeltodescribetradepatternswhenthereareNgoods.Comparativeadvantageinthismodelisdriven
byrelativewagesbetweencountriesratherthanrelativeprices.However,theimplicationthatcountrieswill
exportgoodsforwhichtheyhavethelowestopportunitycostremains.
TheNgoodmodelisusedtodiscusstherolethattransportcostsplayinmakingsomegoodsnontraded.
Astransportcostsrise,thegainsfromtradedecrease,andinsomecasestheyarecompletelyeliminated.
ThechapterendswithadiscussionofempiricalevidenceoftheRicardianmodel.Theauthorsarecareful
topointoutthatwhiletherathersimplifiedmodelcannotexplainalltradepatterns,thebasicpredictionthat
countriestendtoexportgoodsforwhichtheyhaveacomparativeadvantage(highrelativeproductivity)
hasbeenconfirmedbyanumberofstudies.

Chapter4
SpecificFactorsandIncomeDistribution
2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction5

Chapter Organization
TheSpecificFactorsModel
Box:WhatIsaSpecificFactor?
AssumptionsoftheModel
ProductionPossibilities
Prices,Wages,andLaborAllocation
RelativePricesandtheDistributionofIncome
InternationalTradeintheSpecificFactorsModel
IncomeDistributionandtheGainsfromTrade
ThePoliticalEconomyofTrade:APreliminaryView
CaseStudy:TradeandUnemployment
IncomeDistributionandTradePolitics
InternationalLaborMobility
CaseStudy:WageConvergenceintheAgeofMassMigration
CaseStudy:ImmigrationandtheU.S.Economy
Summary
APPENDIXTOCHAPTER4:FurtherDetailsonSpecificFactors
MarginalandTotalProduct
RelativePricesandtheDistributionofIncome

Chapter Overview
InChapter3,theRicardianmodeloftradewasintroducedwithlaborasthesinglefactorofproduction
exhibitingconstantreturnstoscale.Whileinformative,thismodelfailstohighlighttheobservedopposition
tofreetrade.Inthischapter,theSpecificFactorsmodelispresentedtogainabetterunderstandingofthe
distributionaleffectsoftrade.Aftertrade,theexportingindustryexpandswhiletheimportcompeting
industryshrinks.Asaresult,thefactorspecifictotheexportingindustrygainsfromtradewhilethefactor
specifictotheimportcompetingindustrylosesfromtrade.However,theaggregategainsfromtradeare
greaterthanthelosses.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction6

TheSpecificFactorsmodelassumesthatthereisonefactorthatismobilebetweensectors(commonly
thoughtofaslabor)andproductionfactorsthatarespecifictoeachsector.Thechapterbeginswithasimple
economyproducingtwogoods:clothandfood.Clothisproducedusinglaboranditsspecificfactor,capital.
Foodisproducedusinglaboranditsspecificfactor,land.Giventhatcapitalandlaborarespecifictotheir
respectiveindustries,themixofgoodsproducedbyacountryisdeterminedbyshareoflaboremployedin
eachindustry.ThekeydifferencebetweentheRicardianmodelandtheSpecificFactorsmodelisthatinthe
latter,therearediminishingreturnstolabor.Forexample,productionoffoodwillincreaseaslaborisadded,
butgivenafixedamountofland,eachadditionalworkerwilladdlessandlesstofoodproduction.
Asweassumethatlaborisperfectlymobilebetweenindustries,thewageratemustbeidenticalbetween
industries.Withcompetitivelabormarkets,thewagemustbeequaltothepriceofeachgoodtimesthe
marginalproductoflaborinthatsector.Wecanusethecommonwageratetoshowthattheeconomywill
produceamixofgoodssuchthattherelativepriceofonegoodintermsoftheotherisequaltotherelative
costofthatgoodintermsoftheother.Thus,anincreaseintherelativepriceofonegoodwillcausethe
economytoshiftitsproductiontowardthatgood.
Withinternationaltrade,thecountrywillexportthegoodwhoserelativepriceisbelowtheworldrelative
price.Theworldrelativepricemaydifferfromthedomesticpricebeforetradefortworeasons.First,as
intheRicardianmodel,countriesdifferintheirproductiontechnologies.Second,countriesdifferinterms
oftheirendowmentsofthefactorsspecifictoeachindustry.Aftertrade,thedomesticrelativepricewill
equaltheworldrelativeprice.Asaresult,therelativepriceintheexportingsectorwillriseandtherelative
priceintheimportcompetingsectorwillfall.Thiswillleadtoanexpansionintheexportsectoranda
contractionoftheimportcompetingsector.
Supposethataftertrade,therelativepriceofclothincreasesby10percent.Asaresult,thecountrywill
increaseproductionofcloth.Thiswillleadtoalessthan10percentincreaseinthewageratesincesome
workerswillmovefromthefoodtotheclothindustry.Therealwagepaidtoworkersintermsofcloth
(w/PC)willfallwhiletherealwagepaidintermsoffood(w/PF)willrise.Thenetwelfareeffectforlaboris
ambiguousanddependsonrelativepreferencesforclothandfood.Ownersofcapitalwillunambiguously
gainsincetheypaytheirworkersalowerrealwagewhileownersoflandwillunambiguouslyloseasthey
nowfacehighercosts.Thus,tradebenefitsthefactorspecifictotheexportingsector,hurtsthefactor
specifictotheimportcompetingsector,andhasambiguouseffectsonthemobilefactor.Despitethese
asymmetriceffectsoftrade,theoveralleffectoftradeisanetgain.Stateddifferently,itistheoretically
possibletoredistributethegainsfromtradetothosewhowerehurtbytradeandmakeeveryonebetteroff
thantheywerebeforetrade.
Giventhesepositivenetwelfareeffects,whyistheresuchoppositiontofreetrade?Toanswerthisquestion,
thechapterlooksatthepoliticaleconomyofprotectionism.Thebasicintuitionisthatthethoughthetotal
gainsexceedthelossesfromtrade,thelossesfromtradetendtobeconcentrated,whilethegainsarediffused.
ImporttariffsonsugarintheUnitedStatesareusedtoillustratethisdynamic.Itisestimatedthatsugartariffs
costtheaverageperson$7peryear.Addedupacrossallpeople,thisisaverylargelossfromprotectionism,
buttheindividuallossesarenotlargeenoughtoinducepeopletolobbyforanendtothesetariffs.However,
thegainsfromprotectionismareconcentratedamongasmallnumberofsugarproducers,whoareableto
effectivelycoordinateandlobbyforcontinuedprotection.
Whilethelosersfromtradeareoftenabletosuccessfullylobbyforprotectionism,thechapterhighlights
threereasonswhythisisaninefficientmethodoflimitingthelossesfromtrade.First,theactualimpact
oftradeonunemploymentisfairlylow,withestimatesofonly2.5percentofunemploymentdirectly
attributabletointernationaltrade.Second,thelossesfromtradearedrivenbyoneindustryexpanding
attheexpenseofanother.Thisphenomenonisnotspecifictointernationaltradeandisalsoseenwith
changingpreferencesornewtechnology.Whyshouldpolicybesingledouttoprotectpeoplehurtbytrade,

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction7

andnotforthosehurtbytheseothertrends?Finally,itismoreefficienttohelpthosehurtbytradeby
redistributingthegainsfromtradeintheformofsafetynetsforthosetemporarilyunemployedandworker
retrainingprogramstoeasethetransitionfromimportcompetingtoexportsectors.
Finally,thechapterusestheframeworkoftheSpecificFactorsmodeltoanalyzethedistributionaleffects
ofinternationallabormigration.Withfreemigrationoflaboracrossborders,wagesmustequalizebetween
countries.Workerswillmigratefromlowwagecountriestohighwagecountries.Asaresult,wagesinthe
lowwagecountrieswillriseandthoseinthehighwagecountrieswillfall.Thoughtheneteffectoffree
migrationispositive,therewillbebothwinnersandlosersfrommigration.Workerswhostayedbehind
inthelowwagecountrywillbenefit,aswillownersofcapitalinthehighwagecountry.Workersinthe
highwagecountrywillbehurt,aswillownersofcapitalinthelowwagecountry.

Chapter5
ResourcesandTrade:TheHeckscherOhlinModel

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction8

Chapter Organization
ModelofaTwoFactorEconomy
PricesandProduction
ChoosingtheMixofInputs
FactorPricesandGoodsPrices
ResourcesandOutput
EffectsofInternationalTradeBetweenTwoFactorEconomies
RelativePricesandthePatternofTrade
TradeandtheDistributionofIncome
CaseStudy:NorthSouthTradeandIncomeInequality
FactorPriceEqualization
EmpiricalEvidenceontheHeckscherOhlinModel
TradeinGoodsasaSubstituteforTradeinFactors
PatternsofExportsBetweenDevelopedandDevelopingCountries
ImplicationsoftheTests
Summary
APPENDIXTOCHAPTER5:FactorPrices,GoodsPrices,andProductionDecisions
ChoiceofTechnique
GoodsPricesandFactorPrices
MoreonResourcesandOutput

nChapter Overview
InChapter3,tradebetweennationswasmotivatedbydifferencesinternationallyintherelativeproductivity
ofworkerswhenproducingarangeofproducts.InChapter4,theSpecificFactorsmodelconsidered
additionalfactorsofproduction,butonlylaborwasmobilebetweensectors.InChapter5,thisanalysis
goesastepfurtherbyintroducingtheHeckscherOhlintheory.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction9

TheHeckscherOhlintheoryconsidersthepatternofproductionandtradewhichwillarisewhencountries
havedifferentendowmentsofsuchfactorsofproductionaslabor,capital,andland;wherethesefactors
aremobilebetweensectorsinthelongrun.Thebasicpointisthatcountriestendtoexportgoodsthatare
intensiveinthefactorswithwhichtheyareabundantlysupplied.Tradehasstrongeffectsontherelative
earningsofresources,andaccordingtotheory,leadstoequalizationacrosscountriesoffactorprices.
Thesetheoreticalresultsandrelatedempiricalfindingsarepresentedinthischapter.
Thechapterbeginsbydevelopingageneralequilibriummodelofaneconomywithtwogoodswhichare
eachproducedusingtwofactorsaccordingtofixedcoefficientproductionfunctions.Theassumptionof
fixedcoefficientproductionfunctionsprovidesanunambiguousrankingofgoodsintermsoffactor
intensities.(Amorerealisticmodelallowingforsubstitutionbetweenfactorsofproductionispresented
laterinthechapterwiththesameconclusions.)Twoimportantresultsarederivedusingthismodel.The
firstisknownastheRybczynskieffect.Increasingtherelativesupplyofonefactor,holdingrelativegoods
pricesconstant,leadstoabiasedexpansionofproductionpossibilitiesfavoringtherelativesupplyofthe
goodwhichusesthatfactorintensively.
ThesecondkeyresultisknownastheStolperSamuelsoneffect.Increasingtherelativepriceofagood,
holdingfactorsuppliesconstant,increasesthereturntothefactorusedintensivelyintheproductionof
thatgoodbymorethanthepriceincrease,whileloweringthereturntotheotherfactor.Thisresulthas
importantincomedistributionimplications.
Itcanbequiteinstructivetothinkoftheeffectsofdemographic/laborforcechangesonthesupplyof
differentproducts.Forexample,howmightthepatternofproductionduringtheproductiveyearsofthe
BabyBoomgenerationdifferfromthepatternofproductionforpostBabyBoomgenerations?What
doesthisimplyforreturnstofactorsandrelativepricebehavior?Whateffectwouldamorerestrictive
immigrationpolicyhaveonthepatternofproductionandtradefortheUnitedStates?
ThecentralmessageconcerningtradepatternsoftheHeckscherOhlintheoryisthatcountriestendtoexport
goodswhoseproductionisintensiveinfactorswithwhichtheyarerelativelyabundantlyendowed.Comparing
theUnitedStatesandMexico,forexample,weobservearelativeabundanceofcapitalintheUnitedStatesand
arelativeabundanceoflaborinMexico.Thus,goodsthatintensivelyusecapitalinproductionshouldbe
cheapertoproduceintheUnitedStatesandthoseintensivelyusinglaborshouldbecheapertoproducein
Mexico.Withtrade,theUnitedStatesshouldexportcapitalintensivegoodslikecomputers,whileMexico
shouldexportlaborintensivegoodsliketextiles.Withintegratedmarkets,internationaltradeshouldlead
toaconvergenceofgoodsprices.Thus,thepricesofcapitalintensivegoodsintheUnitedStatesand
laborintensivegoodsinMexicowillrise.AccordingtotheStolperSamuelsoneffect,ownersofa
countrysabundantfactors(e.g.,capitalownersintheUnitedStates,laborinMexico)willgainfromtrade,
whileownersofthecountrysscarcefactors(laborintheUnitedStates,capitalinMexico)willlosefrom
trade.TheextensionofthisresultistheFactorPriceEqualizationtheorem,whichstatesthattradeingoods
(andthuspriceequalizationofgoods)willleadtoanequalizationoffactorprices.Theseincome
distributioneffectsaremoreorlesspermanent,giventhatfactorabundancesdonotquicklychangewithin
acountry.Whiletheoretically,thegainsfromtradecouldberedistributedsuchthateveryoneisbetteroff,
suchaplanisdifficulttoimplementinpractice.Thepoliticalimplicationsoffactorpriceequalization
shouldbeinterestingtostudents.
AfterpresentingthebasictheorybehindtheHeckscherOhlintheory,therestofthechapterexaminesempirical
testsofthemodel,beginningwithacasestudylookingatincomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesWagespaid
toskilledworkersintheUnitedStateshavebeenrisingatamuchfasterratethanthosepaidtounskilled
workersoverthepastfewdecades.Atthesametime,therehasbeenalargeincreaseininternationaltrade.
GiventhattheUnitedStatesisrelativelyabundantinskilledlabor,theHeckscherOhlintheorywould
predictthatincreasedtradeshouldleadtohigherwagesforskilledworkersandlowerwagesforunskilled
2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction10

workers.Onthesurface,thisappearstobeanempiricalconfirmationofthetheory.However,otherstudies
arguethatrisingwageinequalitycanonlypartiallybeexplainedbyincreasedtrade.Accordingtothe
HeckscherOhlinmodel,theincreaseinskilledwagesshouldbedrivenbyanincreaseinthepriceofskill
intensivegoodsfollowingtrade.However,skillintensivegoodspriceshavenotincreasedbynearlythe
sameproportionasskilledwages.IfrisingwageinequalityinarichcountryliketheUnitedStatesis
drivenbyfactorpriceequalization,thenweshouldalsoobserveanarrowinggapindevelopingcountries
thatareexportinglowskillintensivegoods.However,incomeinequalityinthesenationsisactuallylarger
thaninrichcountries.Finally,tradebetweenrichandpoornationsissimplynotlargeenoughtobeentirely
responsibleforthesizeoftheincomegap.Rather,theincreasingskillpremiumismostlikelyduetoskill
biasedtechnicalinnovationslikecomputersthathaveincreasedtheproductivitiesofskilledworkersmore
thanunskilledworkers.
AnotherempiricalobservationtestingvalidityoftheHeckscherOhlintheoryistheLeontiefparadox.This
istheobservationthatthecapitalintensityofU.S.exportsisactuallylowerthanthatofU.S.imports,exactly
theoppositeofwhatthetheorywouldpredictforacapitalabundantcountry.Furtherevidenceofthisparadox
isfoundinglobaldata,withacountrysfactorabundancedoingarelativelypoorjobofpredictingitstrade
patterns.Finally,thetheorypredictsamuchlargervolumeoftrade(givenobserveddifferencesinfactor
endowments)thanweactuallyseeinthedata.AcountrylikeChina,forexample,hasasignificantabundance
inlabor.However,Chinasnetexportsoflaborintensivegoodsarelowerthanwhatthetheorywouldpredict.
Similarly,U.S.netimportsoflaborintensivegoodsarelowerthanwhatwouldbeexpectedgivenitsrelative
laborscarcity.Anexplanationforthismissingtradeisthattheassumptionofidenticaltechnologyacross
countriesisflawed.Rather,therearesignificantdifferencesinproductivityacrosscountries.Thatsaid,when
thesampleisrestrictedtotradebetweendevelopedanddevelopingcountries(i.e.,NorthSouthtrade),the
HeckscherOhlintheoryfitswell(e.g.,theUnitedStatesimportsmorelowskillproductsfromBangladesh
andmorehighskillproductsfromGermany).Thisobservationhasmotivatedmanyeconomiststoconsider
motivesfortradebetweennationsthatarenotexclusivelybasedondifferencesacrosscountries.These
conceptswillbeexploredinlaterchapters.Despitetheseshortcomings,importantandrelevantresults
concerningincomedistributionareobtainedfromtheHeckscherOhlintheory.

Chapter6
TheStandardTradeModel

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction11

Chapter Organization
AStandardModelofaTradingEconomy
ProductionPossibilitiesandRelativeSupply
RelativePricesandDemand
TheWelfareEffectofChangesintheTermsofTrade
DeterminingRelativePrices
EconomicGrowth:AShiftoftheRSCurve
GrowthandtheProductionPossibilityFrontier
WorldRelativeSupplyandtheTermsofTrade
InternationalEffectsofGrowth
CaseStudy:HastheGrowthofNewlyIndustrializingCountriesHurtAdvancedNations?
TariffsandExportSubsidies:SimultaneousShiftsinRSandRD
RelativeDemandandSupplyEffectsofaTariff
EffectsofanExportSubsidy
ImplicationsofTermsofTradeEffects:WhoGainsandWhoLoses?
InternationalBorrowingandLending
IntertemporalProductionPossibilitiesandTrade
TheRealInterestRate
IntertemporalComparativeAdvantage
Summary
APPENDIXTOCHAPTER6:MoreonIntertemporalTrade

nChapter Overview
Previouschaptershavehighlightedspecificsourcesofcomparativeadvantagewhichgiveriseto
internationaltrade.Thischapterpresentsageneralmodelwhichadmitspreviousmodelsasspecialcases.
Thisstandardtrademodelistheworkhorseofinternationaltradetheoryandcanbeusedtoaddressawide
rangeofissues.Someoftheseissues,suchasthewelfareanddistributionaleffectsofeconomicgrowth,
transfersbetweennations,andtariffsandsubsidiesontradedgoods,areconsideredinthischapter.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

Chapter1Introduction12

Thestandardtrademodelisbaseduponfourrelationships.First,aneconomywillproduceatthepointwhere
theproductionpossibilitiescurveistangenttotherelativepriceline(calledtheisovalueline).Second,
indifferencecurvesdescribethetastesofaneconomy,andtheconsumptionpointforthateconomyis
foundatthetangencyofthebudgetlineandthehighestindifferencecurve.Thesetworelationshipsyield
thefamiliargeneralequilibriumtradediagramforasmalleconomy(onewhichtakesasgiventhetermsof
trade),wheretheconsumptionpointandproductionpointarethetangenciesoftheisovaluelinewiththe
highestindifferencecurveandtheproductionpossibilitiesfrontier,respectively.
Youmaywanttoworkwiththisstandarddiagramtodemonstrateanumberofbasicpoints.First,anautarkic
economymustproducewhatitconsumes,whichdeterminestheequilibriumpriceratio;andsecond,opening
aneconomytotradeshiftsthepriceratiolineandunambiguouslyincreaseswelfare.Third,animprovement
inthetermsoftradeincreaseswelfareintheeconomy.Fourth,itisstraightforwardtomovefromasmall
countryanalysistoatwocountryanalysisbyintroducingastructureofworldrelativedemandandsupply
curveswhichdeterminerelativeprices.
TheserelationshipscanbeusedinconjunctionwiththeRybczynskiandtheStolperSamuelsontheorems
fromthepreviouschaptertoaddressarangeofissues.Forexample,youcanconsiderwhetherthedramatic
economicgrowthofcountrieslikeJapanandKoreahashelpedorhurttheUnitedStatesasawhole,and
alsoidentifytheclassesofindividualswithintheUnitedStateswhohavebeenhurtbytheparticulargrowth
biasesofthesecountries.Inteachingthesepoints,itmightbeinterestingandusefultorelatethemtocurrent
events.Forexample,youcanleadaclassdiscussionontheimplicationsfortheUnitedStatesofthe
provisionofformsoftechnicalandeconomicassistancetotheemergingeconomiesaroundtheworldor
thewaysinwhichaworldrecessioncanleadtoafallindemandforU.S.exportgoods.
TheexampleprovidedinthetextconsidersthepopularargumentsinthemediathatgrowthinJapanor
KoreahurtstheUnitedStates.Theanalysispresentedinthischapterdemonstratesthatthebiasofgrowth
isimportantindeterminingwelfareeffectsratherthanthecountryinwhichgrowthoccurs.Theexistence
ofbiasedgrowthandthepossibilityofimmiserizinggrowtharediscussed.TheRelativeSupply(RS)and
RelativeDemand(RD)curvesillustratetheeffectofbiasedgrowthonthetermsoftrade.Thenewterms
oftradelinecanbeusedwiththegeneralequilibriumanalysistofindthewelfareeffectsofgrowth.Ageneral
principlewhichemergesisthatacountrywhichexperiencesexportbiasedgrowthwillhaveadeterioration
initstermsoftrade,whileacountrywhichexperiencesimportbiasedgrowthhasanimprovementinits
termsoftrade.Acasestudypointsoutthatgrowthintherestoftheworldhasmadeothercountriesmore
liketheUnitedStates.ThisimportbiasedgrowthhasworsenedthetermsoftradefortheUnitedStates.
Thesecondareatowhichthestandardtrademodelisappliedaretheeffectsoftariffsandexportsubsidies
onwelfareandtermsoftrade.Theanalysisproceedsbyrecognizingthattariffsorsubsidiesshiftboththe
relativesupplyandrelativedemandcurves.Atariffonimportsimprovesthetermsoftrade,expressedin
externalprices,whileasubsidyonexportsworsenstermsoftrade.Thesizeoftheeffectdependsuponthe
sizeofthecountryintheworld.Tariffsandsubsidiesalsoimposedistortionarycostsupontheeconomy.
Thus,ifacountryislargeenough,theremaybeanoptimum,nonzerotariff.Exportsubsidies,however,
onlyimposecostsuponaneconomy.Internationally,tariffsaidimportcompetingsectorsandhurtexport
sectorswhilesubsidieshavetheoppositeeffect.
Thechapterthencloseswithadiscussionofinternationalborrowingandlending.Thestandardtrademodelis
adaptedtotradeinconsumptionacrosstime.Therelativepriceoffutureconsumptionisdefinedas1/(1r),
whereristherealinterestrate.Countrieswithrelativelyhighrealinterestrates(newlyindustrializing
countrieswithhighinvestmentreturnsforexample)willbebiasedtowardfutureconsumption,andwill
effectivelyexportfutureconsumptionbyborrowingfromestablisheddevelopedcountrieswithrelatively
lowerrealinterestrates.

2012PearsonEducation,Inc.PublishingasAddisonWesley

You might also like