A New Method For Flotation Rate Characterization
A New Method For Flotation Rate Characterization
Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng
Short communication
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 October 2015
Revised 6 February 2016
Accepted 24 March 2016
Keywords:
Flotation rate characterization
Top-of-froth grade
Froth discharge velocity
a b s t r a c t
A new methodology is proposed for flotation characterization in industrial operations. The approach considers the mineral recovery to be proportional to both the top-of-froth (TOF) grade and the froth discharge velocity down a bank of cells. The procedure allows for the identification of the fractional
recovery profile from the discharge velocities and the TOF grades. In addition, if the total recovery of
the bank is available, the cell recoveries can be estimated by scaling the fractional recoveries. For this purpose, a single parameter was used to scale the recoveries for each sampling survey in order to obtain the
kinetic response along the flotation banks. Industrial tests were performed in two rougher banks; one
bank consisted of six 250 m3 self-aerated cells in a 1-1-1-1-1-1 arrangement, and the other bank consisted of nine 130 m3 self-aerated cells in a 1-2-2-2-2 arrangement. The results showed good agreement
with the recovery profiles obtained from the cell-by-cell mass balances along two industrial flotation
banks.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The metallurgical characterization of a flotation bank is typically performed using the feed, the concentrate and the tail grades.
All of the key streams are sampled, and repeats are conducted to
improve the data reliability (Di Sandro et al., 2013). In addition,
data reconciliation is performed if an excess of information is available (Wills and Napier-Munn, 2006). From the mass balance
results, kinetic models can be fitted to the mineral recovery data
to evaluate and to compare flotation banks. The model analysis
allows for the evaluation of the flotation process and detection of
opportunities for improvement in the design, operation and control of the circuit (Yianatos et al., 2006).
The sampling of the different streams is subject to access limitations, sampling constraints (e.g., circuit layout, personnel) and
measurement uncertainties (Di Sandro et al., 2013). Therefore,
the mineral recovery estimations are sensitive to errors in both
the sampling procedures and the grade analyses. For example, feed
and tail grades in rougher circuits have low values and are susceptible to measurement errors, which may lead to biased results in
the mineral recovery.
Despite the usefulness of metallurgical evaluations, sampling
surveys are not frequently conducted due to their high preparation
requirements, time of analysis, and high costs (Wills and
Corresponding author at: P.O. Box 110-V, Valparaso, Chile.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Yianatos).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.026
0892-6875/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
243
(a)
PR
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C6
C7
C8
(b)
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
Fig. 1. Arrangement of cells in series, rougher flotation (a) bank A and (b) bank B.
C9
244
Table 1
Cu recoveries and operating conditions in the rougher flotation circuits A and B.
Sampling campaign
Bank A
Bank B
1
Cell-by-cell
2
Cell-by-cell
3
Short-cut
4
Short-cut
Cu feed grade, %
Feed tonnage, tph
Cu recovery, %
JG, cm/s
hF, cm
xTOF of Cu, %
vD, cm/s
0.6
781
92.6
0.630.89
511
3.833.9
0.811.9
0.56
798
91.6
0.450.74
339
2.033.1
0.513.1
0.65
732
89.7
Not available
440
0.830.4
3.09.2
0.64
798
83.9
0.731.28
430
3.328.3
1.37.2
(a)
i cell number
(b)
External
Launder
Froth
Crowder
Sample
Froth
Pulp
TOF sampling
point
Internal
Launder
245
(b)
Sampling Campaign 1
Sampling Campaign 2
Sampling Campaign 3
10
40
Sampling Campaign 1
Sampling Campaign 2
Sampling Campaign 3
35
(a)
15
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
PR
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
PR
C6
C1
C3
C4
C5
C6
Cell number
Cell number
(c)
(d)
40
15
35
C2
10
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
Cell number
Cell number
Fig. 3. Profiles of (a) the froth discharge velocity, bank A, (b) the TOF grade of Cu, bank A, (c) the froth discharge velocity, bank B and (d) the TOF grade of Cu, bank B.
Table 2
Froth depth in each cell of the rougher flotation circuits A and B.
Cell
Sampling campaign
Bank A
PR
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
Bank B
11 cm
6 cm
10 cm
6 cm
6 cm
5 cm
6 cm
39 cm
13 cm
7 cm
8 cm
14 cm
3 cm
4 cm
40 cm
5 cm
8 cm
5 cm
6 cm
4 cm
4 cm
10 cm
7 cm
23 cm
4 cm
30 cm
6 cm
30 cm
5 cm
11 cm
In Eq. (1), a is a function of the froth properties, such as the mineral size and density, the gas holdup in the froth, the flow area to
the concentrate stream, the solid percentage in the froth and a factor related to the momentum variation between the sampling
points (i.e., sampling points of TOF and froth discharge velocity,
Fig. 2b). It should be noted that the a values depend upon the operating conditions, which cause changes in the froth characteristic
down the bank. These changes are mainly related to the profiles
of the superficial gas rate and the froth depth. In this sense, the a
parameter would change cell by cell. From a practical point of
view, however, it has been observed that a single value of a
(weighted-average value) can be adequately used to describe the
kinetics of the whole bank. Therefore, assuming that a is the
Rbank;Cu a
6
X
v disch;i xTOF;i ;
i cell number
i1
246
(a)
(b)
0.6
0.5
0.5
RCu,i /RCu,bank
0.4
RCu,i /RCu,bank
0.6
Sampling Campaign 1
Sampling Campaign 2
Sampling Campaign 3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
PR
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
Cell number
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9
Cell number
Fig. 4. Ratio between Cu recovery per cell and the total Cu recovery of the bank (fractional recovery profile). (a) bank A, (b) bank B.
Ri;Cu
v disch;i xTOF;i
P6
;
Rbank;Cu
i1 v disch;i xTOF;i
i cell number
Eq. (3) gives the fractional recovery profile for each cell from the
discharge velocities and the TOF grades. If the total recovery of the
bank is available, this can be multiplied by the fractional recoveries
to obtain the actual cell recovery. Fig. 4a and b shows the fractional
recovery profiles along the rougher flotation bank A and B, respectively. In both banks, the first cell recovered approximately 4050%
of the total Cu recovered in each circuit. The fractional recovery
profiles are smoothed versions of the TOF grade and the froth discharge velocity profiles shown in Fig. 3a and b.
4. Results and discussions
The froth discharge velocities (Fig. 3a), the TOF grades of Cu
(Fig. 3b) and the rougher recovery of Cu (Table 1) were used to
Cu recovery estimation, %
100
90
80
70
60
PR
Sampling 1
Sampling 2
Sampling 3
Sampling 4
y=x
10%
50
40
30
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
247
(b)
100
90
90
80
80
Copper recovery, %
Copper recovery, %
(a)
100
70
60
50
40
30
20
Data from mass balance
New approach (=0.10)
10
0
70
60
50
40
30
20
Data from mass balance
New approach (=0.19)
10
0
PR
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C1
Cell number
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
Cell number
Fig. 6. Comparison between the Cu recoveries obtained from the mass balances (cell-by-cell) and from the new approach: (a) rougher bank A, sampling campaign 2 and (b)
rougher bank B, sampling campaign 4.
5. Conclusions
References
Acknowledgements
Funding for process modelling and control research was provided by CONICYT, Project Fondecyt 1160547, and by Federico
Santa Maria Technical University, Project 116.27.2.