Collection Weeding Manual
Collection Weeding Manual
You may often find that the item you've just discarded will answer the next reference
question. Don't let such a possibility freeze you into inaction and prevent you from weeding.
Sometimes it is much more preferable to admit that you lack an item or coverage in a
subject area than it is to give a patron an item that is factually inaccurate or woefully
obsolete.
Sometimes the person that selected an item finds it very difficult to discard that item if it
hasn't circulated. Be careful that you are not keeping items on the shelf in an attempt to
justify the original selection decision.
Numerous studies have been conducted on the subject of weeding. Most of the newer
methods that have been developed acknowledge that weeding should be both a subjective
and objective process.
On the subjective side, you must make some subjective decisions about what you think
"should" be in your library's collection. For instance, should a medium sized public library
have the complete works of Mark Twain...should it have a complete collection of the New
England Journal of Medicine? Subjective decisions should be used to define your core
collection and provide materials that you think your patrons will need.
On the objective side of the problem, you can employ objective criteria to identify the
materials that your patrons want through a study of what they have borrowed in the past.
Studies by Stanley J. Slote and others have concluded that among circulating materials 98%
of all of the materials used by patrons in libraries were circulated within the past 3 years.
99% were used within the last 4 years. A total of only 15% to 25% of all of your materials are
likely to be used again.
The ideal focus of an objective study would be on determining how long an item sits on
the shelf without being used and how long an item is being kept by a patron when it
circulates. Computerized circulation control can provide us with this data for weeding
purposes.
What follows is a modified objective method of weeding with some sample objective
criteria....
THE PROCESS
1. Familiarize yourself with the library's goals, objectives, avowed roles, selection policies,
selection criteria, subject strengths and special collections.
2. Assemble bibliographies and reading lists of core works in major subject areas and
authors of lasting popularity or value for use in the process.
3. Establish your general weeding criteria for all areas of your collection according to the age
of items, circulation frequency, content and condition.
4. Review each item on the shelf according to weeding criteria and other selection tools,
separating items recommended for withdrawal. A marker can be used to draw a line across
the top of retained volumes to indicate they have been reviewed. Materials of permanent
value can be marked in red.
6. Complete evaluation form for deselected items, place in volume and load cart.
7. Identify and maintain records of underdeveloped subject areas or areas of extreme
popularity as the review process proceeds.
8. Proceed with recommended disposition.
9. Periodically repeat the process with special attention to those items that may have been
in circulation during the previous review.
10/5/MUSTY
030 Encyclopedias
5/X/MUSTY
Other 000's
10/X/MUSTY
10/5/MUSTY
20/5/MUSTY
20/5/MUSTY
3/X/MUSTY
5/5/MUSTY
Historical
15/5/MUSTY
340 Law
10/X/MUSTY
350 Government
15/X/MUSTY
370 Education
10/5/MUSTY
10/5/MUSTY
Folklore, Customs
15/5/MUSTY
15/5/MUSTY
15/5/MUSTY
580 Botany
15/5/MUSTY
Other 500's
10/5/MUSTY
5/5/MUSTY
630 Agriculture
10/5/MUSTY
5/5/MUSTY
690 Manufacturing
10/5/MUSTY
Other 600's
5/5/MUSTY
15/5/MUSTY
770 Photography
10/5/MUSTY
Other 700's
800 LITERATURE
15/X/MUSTY
X/X/MUSTY
Guidebooks
5/5/MUSTY
Narratives
15/5/MUSTY
920 Biography
X/X/MUSTY
Other 900's
FIC FICTION
15/5/MUSTY
X/5/MUSTY
5/5/MUSTY
2/X/MUSTY