0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.: No. 80, Docket 96-7010

Mary Dale sued William Kelley, an assistant district attorney, Charles DiPasquale, a police chief, and various municipal entities for false arrest and malicious prosecution stemming from her arrest and prosecution for perjury. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. It found that there was probable cause for Dale's arrest and prosecution, and that Kelley had absolute and qualified immunity. It also found that DiPasquale had qualified immunity and that the municipal defendants could not be liable given the rulings of probable cause and immunity. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, substantially adopting its reasoning.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.: No. 80, Docket 96-7010

Mary Dale sued William Kelley, an assistant district attorney, Charles DiPasquale, a police chief, and various municipal entities for false arrest and malicious prosecution stemming from her arrest and prosecution for perjury. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. It found that there was probable cause for Dale's arrest and prosecution, and that Kelley had absolute and qualified immunity. It also found that DiPasquale had qualified immunity and that the municipal defendants could not be liable given the rulings of probable cause and immunity. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, substantially adopting its reasoning.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

95 F.

3d 2

Mary DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.
William J. KELLEY, Individually and in his Official Capacity
as Assistant District Attorney for the County of Livingston,
Charles J. Dipasquale, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Chief of the Mount Morris Police Department,
County of Livingston, and Village of Mt. Morris, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 80, Docket 96-7010.

United States Court of Appeals,


Second Circuit.
Argued Aug. 29, 1996.
Decided Sept. 11, 1996.

Robert B. Koegel, Rochester, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


David J. Edwards, Rochester, New York (Law Offices of Scott H. Smith,
Rochester, New York), for Defendants-Appellees Kelley and County of
Livingston.
Before: MESKILL, KEARSE, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Mary Dale appeals from a final judgment of the United States District
Court for the Western District of New York, David G. Larimer, Judge,
dismissing her complaint for false arrest and malicious prosecution on a charge
of perjury as a result of testimony she gave at a felony hearing. The district
court granted summary judgment (a) in favor of defendant William J. Kelley,
the assistant district attorney who ordered Dale's arrest and prosecution, on the
grounds that there was probable cause to arrest Dale and initiate criminal
proceedings against her, and on grounds of absolute and qualified immunity;
(b) in favor of defendant Charles J. DiPasquale, a law enforcement officer who,
inter alia, arrested Dale at the instruction of Kelley, on the ground of qualified

immunity; and (c) in favor of the municipal defendants on the basis of the
rulings that there was probable cause to arrest and to initiate criminal
proceedings. Dale challenges these rulings on appeal. We affirm substantially
for the reasons stated in Judge Larimer's Decision and Order dated December 6,
1995, reported at 908 F.Supp. 125.

You might also like