Scribd
Upload
20 views2 pages

James Earl Parrish v. David A. Williams, Warden, 956 F.2d 1162, 4th Cir. (1992)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Earl Parrish's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously denied habeas corpus relief.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
20 views2 pages

James Earl Parrish v. David A. Williams, Warden, 956 F.2d 1162, 4th Cir. (1992)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed James Earl Parrish's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had previously denied habeas corpus relief.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

956 F.

2d 1162

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
James Earl PARRISH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-7603.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Jan. 28, 1992.
Decided Feb. 26, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-709-R)
James Earl Parrish, appellant pro se.
Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for
appellee.
W.D.Va., [Appeal after remand from 948 F.2d 1282]
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

James Earl Parrish seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas
corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and
the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Parrish v. Williams, No. CA-90709-R (W.D.Va. May 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

DISMISSED.

You might also like