Scribd
Upload
7 views1 page

United States v. Michael Lovell Hinton, 97 F.3d 1449, 4th Cir. (1996)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Lovell Hinton appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion from the district court. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not required.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
7 views1 page

United States v. Michael Lovell Hinton, 97 F.3d 1449, 4th Cir. (1996)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Lovell Hinton appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion from the district court. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the case based on the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not required.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

97 F.

3d 1449

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Lovell HINTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-6452.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Oct. 1, 1996.
Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 1, 1996.

Michael Lovell Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.


Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. 2255
(1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hinton, Nos.
CR-89-434-S; CA-96-522-S (D.Md. Mar. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED.

You might also like