Dwight Jerome Gary v. Eddie Shore, Warden North Carolina Attorney General, 57 F.3d 1066, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsDwight Jerome Gary v. Eddie Shore, Warden North Carolina Attorney General, 57 F.3d 1066, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs57 F.
3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.
Dwight Jerome GARY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Eddie SHORE, Warden; North Carolina Attorney General,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 94-7143.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 16, 1995.
Dwight Jerome Gary, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League, Office
of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by
Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within
the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not
entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by
Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't
of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson,
361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain
an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider
this case. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.*
DISMISSED
