Scribd
Upload
11 views2 pages

United States v. Nathaniel Williams, JR., A/K/A Petey, 966 F.2d 1446, 4th Cir. (1992)

Nathaniel Williams Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Williams' request for relief. The Fourth Circuit also granted Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis for his appeal.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
11 views2 pages

United States v. Nathaniel Williams, JR., A/K/A Petey, 966 F.2d 1446, 4th Cir. (1992)

Nathaniel Williams Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Williams' request for relief. The Fourth Circuit also granted Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis for his appeal.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

966 F.

2d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nathaniel Williams, JR., a/k/a Petey, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6359.

United States Court of Appeals,


Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 1, 1992
Decided: June 12, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-89-259-S, CA-92761-S)
Nathaniel Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Glenda Gay Gordon, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Williams, Jr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief
under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's

opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on


the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-89-259S, CA-92-761-S (D. Md. Mar. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

We grant Williams leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court

You might also like