Scribd
Upload
11 views2 pages

Bryan Lee Livengood v. Sgt. Underwood E. Harris, Lieutenant R. Little, Officer, Defendants, 862 F.2d 870, 4th Cir. (1988)

This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Bryan Lee Livengood filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three prison officials, claiming violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Livengood relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
11 views2 pages

Bryan Lee Livengood v. Sgt. Underwood E. Harris, Lieutenant R. Little, Officer, Defendants, 862 F.2d 870, 4th Cir. (1988)

This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Bryan Lee Livengood filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three prison officials, claiming violations of his civil rights. The district court denied Livengood relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

862 F.

2d 870
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Bryan Lee LIVENGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sgt. UNDERWOOD; E. Harris, Lieutenant; R. Little, Officer,
Defendants- Appellees.
No. 88-6748.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Oct. 21, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 22, 1988.

Bryan Lee Livengood, appellant pro se.


Jacob Leonard Safron (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina),
for appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Bryan Lee Livengood appeals from the district court's order denying relief
under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this
appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Livengood v. Underwood, C/A No. 87-869-C-R (M.D.N.C. July 7,
1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

You might also like