Scribd
Upload
19 views1 page

Ronaldo Alexander Marine v. United States, 843 F.2d 1387, 4th Cir. (1988)

Ronaldo Marine appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on issues already authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Marine's motion for relief.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
19 views1 page

Ronaldo Alexander Marine v. United States, 843 F.2d 1387, 4th Cir. (1988)

Ronaldo Marine appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on issues already authoritatively decided. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Marine's motion for relief.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

843 F.

2d 1387
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Ronaldo Alexander MARINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Feb. 25, 1988.
Decided March 31, 1988.

Ronaldo Alexander Marine, appellant pro se.


Justin W. Williams, Assistant U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and CHAPMAN, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. Marine v. United States, CA-87-739-AM; CR-84-224-A
(E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like