Andrew Bailey v. Richard S. Lindler, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 39 F.3d 1175, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsAndrew Bailey v. Richard S. Lindler, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 39 F.3d 1175, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs39 F.
3d 1175
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Andrew BAILEY, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Richard S. LINDLER, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6658.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 1994.
Decided Nov. 14, 1994.
Andrew Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy
Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition and denying reconsideration. Our review of
the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bailey v. Lindler, No.
CA-93-1718-3-20-B (D.S.C. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
