United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUnited States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs51 F.
3d 267
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
William Howard O'NEIL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mark HUGHES, Superintendent; Wade Hatley, Assistant
Superintendent; Larry Riddle, Lieutenant;
Sergeant Rice; Correctional Officer
Haug, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7133.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 3, 1995.
William Howard O'Neil, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, North
Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Neil v. Hughes, No.
CA-94-49 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
