Scribd
Upload
21 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by John J. Simmons against various government officials. The district court denied relief to Simmons. The appellate court reviewed the case and found no errors, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court agreed with the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 3, 1995 decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
21 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by John J. Simmons against various government officials. The district court denied relief to Simmons. The appellate court reviewed the case and found no errors, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appellate court agreed with the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 3, 1995 decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

82 F.

3d 410

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
John J. SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jim DUNN, Former Solicitor of the Georgetown County
Solicitor's Office; Nelson Brown, Georgetown Police
Officer; Larry C. Batson, SCDC General Counsel; John G.
Norris, Chief of SCDC Offender Records Branch; Flora
Brooks
Boyd, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7764.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 26, 1996.
Decided April 16, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-931443-2-8AJ)
John J. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Carol
Brittian Ervin, YOUNG, CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston,
South Carolina; Arrigo Paul Carotti, John Betts McCutcheon, Jr.,
MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Simmons v. Dunn, No. CA-93-1443-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like