Scribd
Upload
16 views1 page

Russell W. Pumphrey v. John B. Metzger, III, 69 F.3d 533, 4th Cir. (1995)

Russell Pumphrey filed a Section 1983 complaint against John Metzger that was denied by the district court. Pumphrey appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
16 views1 page

Russell W. Pumphrey v. John B. Metzger, III, 69 F.3d 533, 4th Cir. (1995)

Russell Pumphrey filed a Section 1983 complaint against John Metzger that was denied by the district court. Pumphrey appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

69 F.

3d 533

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Russell W. PUMPHREY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John B. METZGER, III, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-7255.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Oct. 30, 1995.

Russell W. Pumphrey, Appellant Pro Se.


Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Pumphrey v. Metzger, No. CA-95-815-R
(W.D.Va. Aug. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

You might also like