Jose Jesus Nuesslein v. Doctor David Haines Elizabeth Panaguiton, Pa Bureau of Prisons, 66 F.3d 316, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsJose Jesus Nuesslein v. Doctor David Haines Elizabeth Panaguiton, Pa Bureau of Prisons, 66 F.3d 316, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs66 F.
3d 316
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation
of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Jose Jesus NUESSLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor David HAINES; Elizabeth Panaguiton, PA; Bureau of
Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided Sept. 18, 1995.
Jose Jesus Nuesslein, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jose Nuesslein appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec.
1983 (1988) complaint. Nuesslein's complaint was dismissed without prejudice
to his right to file a proper claim alleging facts showing that his constitutional
rights were violated. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders.
28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); FED. R. CIV. P . 54(b). Because Nuesslein may
be able to save this action by amending his complaint, the dismissal order that
Nuesslein seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir.1993).
Accordingly, we deny Nuesslein's motion for appointment of counsel, and we
dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
3
DISMISSED.
