0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document discusses a court case where a petitioner appealed the denial of their 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. The appeals court reviewed the district court's opinion and found the appeal lacked merit, denying a certificate of probable cause and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document discusses a court case where a petitioner appealed the denial of their 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. The appeals court reviewed the district court's opinion and found the appeal lacked merit, denying a certificate of probable cause and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

10 F.

3d 806

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Thomas A. DENT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
Corrections; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General
of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6899.

United States Court of Appeals,


Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 18, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina, at Columbia.
Thomas A. Dent, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable
cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Dent v. Evatt, No. CA93-280 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

You might also like