0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Dale Wayne Rogers v. William R. Davis, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 83 F.3d 415, 4th Cir. (1996)

The document discusses a court case where Dale Wayne Rogers filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied relief and the appeals court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

Dale Wayne Rogers v. William R. Davis, Warden T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 83 F.3d 415, 4th Cir. (1996)

The document discusses a court case where Dale Wayne Rogers filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied relief and the appeals court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

83 F.

3d 415

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Dale Wayne ROGERS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William R. DAVIS, Warden; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 95-7973.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: April 15, 1996.
Decided: April 30, 1996.

Dale Wayne Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to
appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v.
Davis, No. CA-94-2246-3-6BD (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED

You might also like