0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

United States v. John H. Patterson, 840 F.2d 11, 4th Cir. (1988)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a lower district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on prior authoritative decisions on the dispositive issues.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

United States v. John H. Patterson, 840 F.2d 11, 4th Cir. (1988)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a lower district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on prior authoritative decisions on the dispositive issues.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

840 F.

2d 11
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John H. PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-7643.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Nov. 30, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 10, 1988.

John H. Patterson, appellant pro se.


Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. United States v. Patterson, CR No. 81-15-01-CR-3; C/A No.
87-7-Civ-3 (E.D.N.C. June 12, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like