0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

James M. Connell v. William Davis, Warden Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 97 F.3d 1446, 4th Cir. (1996)

The court dismissed the appeal of the grant of summary judgment on all but one claim of the habeas corpus petition. The order was not final or appealable as an interlocutory or collateral order according to 28 U.S.C. 1291 and 1292. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal as interlocutory since the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without need for oral argument.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views2 pages

James M. Connell v. William Davis, Warden Attorney General of The State of South Carolina, 97 F.3d 1446, 4th Cir. (1996)

The court dismissed the appeal of the grant of summary judgment on all but one claim of the habeas corpus petition. The order was not final or appealable as an interlocutory or collateral order according to 28 U.S.C. 1291 and 1292. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal as interlocutory since the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without need for oral argument.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

97 F.

3d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
James M. CONNELL, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
William DAVIS, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.
No. 95-7839.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Sept. 20, 1996
Decided Sept. 30, 1996

James M. Connell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy
Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the grant of summary judgment to the Respondents on all but
one claim of Appellant's habeas corpus petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (1994), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order.

We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate


of appealability is required, we deny it. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

You might also like