Scribd
Upload
17 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. It involves a pro se plaintiff, Johnnie Henley, appealing a magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The per curiam opinion finds the appeal without merit. It modifies the judgment order to reflect that the magistrate dismissed the first claim with prejudice and the second claim without prejudice. The court affirms the judgment as modified based on the magistrate's reasoning.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
17 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. It involves a pro se plaintiff, Johnnie Henley, appealing a magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The per curiam opinion finds the appeal without merit. It modifies the judgment order to reflect that the magistrate dismissed the first claim with prejudice and the second claim without prejudice. The court affirms the judgment as modified based on the magistrate's reasoning.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

825 F.

2d 406
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Johnnie HENLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mary Sue TERRY, Attorney General of Virginia; Edward
Murray,
Director; Franklin E. White, Secretary of Public
Safety; Julian Pugh; Russell Wilson;
David Garraghty, Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7129

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted June 22, 1987.
Decided July 16, 1987.

Johnnie Henley, appellant pro se.


Nelson H.C. Fisher, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before RUSSELL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal
from his order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the judgment order does not reflect the magistrate's determination that
the first claim be dismissed with prejudice and the second claim be dismissed
without prejudice, we modify the judgment to reflect those determinations. We

dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been
decided authoritatively and affirm the judgment, as modified, on the reasoning
of the magistrate. Henley v. Terry, C/A No. 87-173-R (E.D. Va., Apr. 21,
1987).
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like