Clinton Ray Rose v. Gary Dixon Finesse G. Coud James L. Miller Administrative Remedy Procedure Board, 61 F.3d 900, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsClinton Ray Rose v. Gary Dixon Finesse G. Coud James L. Miller Administrative Remedy Procedure Board, 61 F.3d 900, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs61 F.
3d 900
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation
of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Clinton Ray ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary DIXON; Finesse G. Coud; James L. Miller;
Administrative Remedy Procedure Board, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 95-6674.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 18, 1995.
Clinton Ray Rose, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Rose v. Dixon, No. CA-94-722-5 (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
