Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is an appeals court ruling that: 1) Affirms the district court's denial of relief for the plaintiff's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2) Finds no reversible error after reviewing the record and district court opinion. 3) Affirms the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in Miller v. Whitworth, No. CA-96-1555-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 27, 1996).

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is an appeals court ruling that: 1) Affirms the district court's denial of relief for the plaintiff's civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2) Finds no reversible error after reviewing the record and district court opinion. 3) Affirms the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in Miller v. Whitworth, No. CA-96-1555-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 27, 1996).

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

97 F.

3d 1448

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Marvin H. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James H. WHITWORTH, Warden; David Chandler, Captain,
in
their official capacities and as individuals,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-7124.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Sept. 20, 1996.
Decided Oct. 2, 1996.

Marvin H. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.


D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Miller v. Whitworth, No. CA-96-1555-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 27, 1996). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

You might also like