Scribd
Upload
17 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Timothy Waddell, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the lower court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
17 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Timothy Waddell, an inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the lower court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

67 F.

3d 298

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Timothy WADDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.R. HALL, Lieutenant, Keen Mountain Correctional Center;
R.J. Beck, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; R.A.
Young, Regional Administrator, Western Region; T.C.
Bullock, Inmate Hearings Officer, Mecklenburg Correctional
Center; C.E. Thompson, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional
Center; W.P. Rogers, Regional Administrator, Central
Region; Institutional Investigator Blansett, Keen Mountain
Correctional Center; John Does, Internal Affairs,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6664.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Aug. 29, 1995.
Decided Oct. 5, 1995.

Timothy Waddell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Waddell v. Hall, No. CA-94-117-R (W.D.Va.


Mar. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like