Scribd
Upload
43 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Franklin Lawrence filed a § 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Department of Corrections and several officials and doctors. The district court denied relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
43 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Franklin Lawrence filed a § 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Department of Corrections and several officials and doctors. The district court denied relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision to accept the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

91 F.

3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Franklin R. LAWRENCE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
Gary Dixon; Joe
Pratt, Lieutenant; Sergeant Mclaughlin; Officer
Pace; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Lincoln,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 96-6006.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: June 20, 1996
Decided June 28, 1996.

Franklin R. Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF


THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Lawrence v. North Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-94-194-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like