Scribd
Upload
20 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Cornelius Tucker Jr. appealed a district court's denial of his request to file a Section 1983 civil rights claim for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to deny Tucker's request based on his non-compliance with the pre-filing injunction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
20 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Cornelius Tucker Jr. appealed a district court's denial of his request to file a Section 1983 civil rights claim for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision to deny Tucker's request based on his non-compliance with the pre-filing injunction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

64 F.

3d 659

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Reginia BROOKS, Parole Officer; J.M. Baker, Parole
Commissioner; J.B. French, Central Prison Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6909.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 15, 1995.

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a 42
U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint for failing to comply with a pre-filing
injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Tucker v. Brooks, No. MISC-95-36-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like