Scribd
Upload
46 views2 pages

Elton McGirt v. Steve Lovin Tommy Strickland J.W. Jacobs, 82 F.3d 410, 4th Cir. (1996)

The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that affirms the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Elton McGirt, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The appeals court finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court judges who heard the case are Niemeyer, Michael, and Butzner.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
46 views2 pages

Elton McGirt v. Steve Lovin Tommy Strickland J.W. Jacobs, 82 F.3d 410, 4th Cir. (1996)

The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that affirms the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Elton McGirt, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The appeals court finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court judges who heard the case are Niemeyer, Michael, and Butzner.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

82 F.

3d 410

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Elton MCGIRT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Steve LOVIN; Tommy Strickland; J.W. Jacobs, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 95-7816.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 10, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95919-5-H)
Elton McGirt, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. McGirt v. Lovin, No. CA-95-919-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

You might also like