0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, And, 19 F.3d 1431, 4th Cir. (1994)

Ronald Wilson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the warden of the Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit also noted that Wilson's denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order is not appealable.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Ronald A. Wilson v. Sewall B. Smith, Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center, And, 19 F.3d 1431, 4th Cir. (1994)

Ronald Wilson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the warden of the Maryland Correctional Adjustment Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit also noted that Wilson's denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order is not appealable.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

19 F.

3d 1431

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Ronald A. WILSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH, Warden, Maryland Correctional
Adjustment
Center, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 94-6170.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 7, 1994.

Ronald A. Wilson, appellant pro se.


Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Smith, No. CA-93-1839-L (D. Md.
Jan. 28, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

We note that the court's denial of Wilson's motion for a temporary restraining
order is not appealable. Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th
Cir.1976)

You might also like