Scribd
Upload
17 views1 page

United States v. John Boettner, JR., 52 F.3d 322, 4th Cir. (1995)

John Boettner Jr. appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial, finding the appeal to be without merit. The court relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Boettner's motion. The court also determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and so dispensed with hearing arguments.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
17 views1 page

United States v. John Boettner, JR., 52 F.3d 322, 4th Cir. (1995)

John Boettner Jr. appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial, finding the appeal to be without merit. The court relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Boettner's motion. The court also determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and so dispensed with hearing arguments.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

52 F.

3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


v.
John BOETTNER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6451.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: February 14, 1995.
Decided: April 19, 1995.

Allan Paul Ides, Washington & Lee University, Lexington, VA, for
Appellant. Michael Warren Carey, United States Attorney, Charleston,
WV, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boettner, No. CR-89-170; No.
CA-90-1037 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like