0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Charles Felder v. John Brown, Warden Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner, 848 F.2d 184, 4th Cir. (1988)

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Charles Felder under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in prior cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding the reasoning in the district court's opinion sufficient.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Charles Felder v. John Brown, Warden Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner, 848 F.2d 184, 4th Cir. (1988)

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Charles Felder under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in prior cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding the reasoning in the district court's opinion sufficient.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

848 F.

2d 184
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Charles FELDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John BROWN, Warden; Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-6550.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: March 29, 1988.
Decided: May 20, 1988.

Charles Felder, appellant pro se.


John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General; Ronald Mark Levitan,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. Felder v. Brown, C/A No. 87-2645-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 6,
1988).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like