Scribd
Upload
36 views1 page

Gary Teague v. Sgt. Ray, Nathan Rice, Ofc. Dupree, Gary Dixon, Ofc. Leathers, K.E. Parker, 835 F.2d 875, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case summary that was not published or cited as precedent. It summarizes a pro se civil rights case brought by Gary Teague against several law enforcement officers. The district court denied Teague relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Upon review, the appellate court found the appeal to be without merit. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the lower court's reasoning, finding the dispositive issues had already been decisively ruled on.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
36 views1 page

Gary Teague v. Sgt. Ray, Nathan Rice, Ofc. Dupree, Gary Dixon, Ofc. Leathers, K.E. Parker, 835 F.2d 875, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case summary that was not published or cited as precedent. It summarizes a pro se civil rights case brought by Gary Teague against several law enforcement officers. The district court denied Teague relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Upon review, the appellate court found the appeal to be without merit. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision based on the lower court's reasoning, finding the dispositive issues had already been decisively ruled on.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

835 F.

2d 875
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Gary TEAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sgt. Ray, Nathan Rice, Ofc. Dupree, Gary Dixon, Ofc.
Leathers, K.E. Parker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7233.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Sept. 30, 1987.
Decided Nov. 30, 1987.

Gary Teague, appellant pro se.


Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, ERVIN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. Teague v. Ray, C/A No. 87-438-CRT (E.D.N.C. June 9,
1987).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like