Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

Larry C. McFarland v. Lieutenant Henderson Jan Golec, M.D., 64 F.3d 658, 4th Cir. (1995)

The document is a court case record from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff-Appellant Larry McFarland on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Lieutenant Henderson and Dr. Jan Golec. The Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials. The district court ruling is affirmed.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

Larry C. McFarland v. Lieutenant Henderson Jan Golec, M.D., 64 F.3d 658, 4th Cir. (1995)

The document is a court case record from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Plaintiff-Appellant Larry McFarland on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Lieutenant Henderson and Dr. Jan Golec. The Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispenses with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials. The district court ruling is affirmed.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

64 F.

3d 658

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Larry C. McFARLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant HENDERSON; Jan Golec, M.D., DefendantsAppellees.
No. 95-6844.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 14, 1995.

Larry C. McFarland, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Brandt, SLENKER,


BRANDT, JENNINGS & JOHNSTON, Merrifield, VA, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. McFarland v. Henderson, No. CA-94-560
(E.D.Va. May 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like