0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Arvin L. Williams v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Lloyd W. Parker, 91 F.3d 136, 4th Cir. (1996)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Arvin L. Williams in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against Defendants Franklin E. Freeman Jr. and Lloyd W. Parker. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Williams' motion for summary judgment and an order of restraint.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

Arvin L. Williams v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Lloyd W. Parker, 91 F.3d 136, 4th Cir. (1996)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Arvin L. Williams in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against Defendants Franklin E. Freeman Jr. and Lloyd W. Parker. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also denied Williams' motion for summary judgment and an order of restraint.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

91 F.

3d 136

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Arvin L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr.; Lloyd W. Parker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 23, 1996.
Decided July 31, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-9649-5-CT-H)
Arvin L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Williams v. Freeman, No. CA-96-49-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 31, 1996). We also deny his motion for summary judgment and for an
order of restraint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like