Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

Richard A. Schmidt v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 36 F.3d 1093, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of Richard Schmidt's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal to be without merit. It therefore affirms the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court materials so no oral arguments were needed.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

Richard A. Schmidt v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of The State of Maryland, 36 F.3d 1093, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of Richard Schmidt's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found the appeal to be without merit. It therefore affirms the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court materials so no oral arguments were needed.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

36 F.

3d 1093

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Richard A. SCHMIDT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6495.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2076-N)
Richard A. Schmidt, appellant pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen.,
Annabelle Louise Lisic, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore,
MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Schmidt v. Smith, No. CA-93-2076-N (D. Md. Mar. 22,
1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like